试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 较难0.4 引用3 组卷283

Jonathan Agnew recently described “unofficial interviews” as those where you agree that it’s “between you and I”. And a Times journalist wrote about someone who had “made Jenny and I feel so welcome”. They are both intelligent people with the ability to express ideas fluently and logically. And yet they wrote “I” where they meant “me”.

It’s happening more and more. We are scared of the mistake like “Terry and me went to the pub”. We’ve all been taught that it should be “Terry and I went to the pub”. Plus we’ve heard the Queen say “my husband and I” a lot. So we begin to use “and I” even when it should be “and me”.

But my point here is not to support the correct usage. It’s the opposite: I want to reject the idea that there’s such a thing as “correct” English at all. Language isn’t like maths, where you can show that two plus two is four. Language has no fundamental rights and wrongs, only conventions. You cannot definitively prove that any are “right” and others “wrong”.

Sometimes correct language sounds absurd. Look at Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) who came up with a new rule. Primary school children now have to be taught that “inverted commas” is right, while “speech marks” is wrong. You and I know that those terms are interchangeable. And the child who looks at those marks on the page can see that both make perfect sense. That’s because a primary school child is more intelligent than the Ofsted turkey who came up with this rule.

As the teacher who told me about the ludicrous rule pointed out, there is no doubt that in a few years’ time, the “incorrect” term will become the “correct” one. But the truly horrible thing about an education system like this is that it destroys children’s love of language. It tells them they have to worry about rules, instead of encouraging them to read and write for its own sake. Let them read for fun and they’ll absorb the rules — or conventions — anyway. Have them shaking in fear about English tests, and you’ll increase their insecurity about getting language “right”.

Then one day that insecurity will have them saying “and I” even though they mean “and me”.

【小题1】Why do people use “and I” when it should be “and me” according to the text?
A.The Ofsted sets a rule.
B.“and I” is the correct English.
C.The Queen makes a similar mistake.
D.People feel insecure about using “and me”.
【小题2】What can we learn from paragraphs 3 and 4?
A.Rules benefit children’s language learning.
B.Language learning is more complicated than maths.
C.Language is based on commonly accepted rules.
D.A primary school child is smarter than the Ofsted.
【小题3】What does the underlined word “ludicrous” in Paragraph 5 mean?
A.Influential.B.Particular.
C.Conventional.D.Ridiculous.
【小题4】Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude towards the correct English?
A.Critical.B.Objective.
C.Favourable.D.Indifferent.
19-20高三上·广东·阶段练习
知识点:语言与文化 议论文语意转化逻辑推理观点态度词义猜测 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Persuasion is the art of convincing someone to agree with you. According to the ancient Greeks,there are three basic tools of persuasion:ethos,pathos,and logos.

Ethos is a speakers way of convincing the audience that she is trustworthy,honest and reliable. One common way a speaker can develop ethos is by explaining how much experience or education she has in the field. After all,you’re more likely to listen to advice about how to take care of your teeth from a dentist than a fireman. A speaker can also create ethos by convincing the audience that she is a good person. If an audience cannot trust you,you will not be able to persuade them.

Pathos is a speaker’s way of connecting with an audience’s emotions. For example,a politician who is trying to convince an audience to vote for him might say that he alone can save the country from a terrible war. These words are intended to fill the audience with fear,thus making them support him. Similarly,an animal charity might show an audience pictures of injured dogs and cats,to make the viewers feel pity. If the audience feels bad for the animals,they will be more likely to donate money.

Logos is the use of facts,statistics,or other evidence to support your argument. An audience will be more likely to believe you if you have convincing data to back up your claims. Presenting this evidence is much more persuasive than simply saying "believe me".

Although ethos,pathos,and logos all have their strengths,they are often most effective when used together. Indeed,most speakers use a combination of ethos,pathos,and logos to persuade their audiences. So,the next time you listen to a speech,watch a commercial,or listen to a friend try to convince you to lend him some money,be on the lookout for these ancient Greek tools of persuasion.

【小题1】Why does the author say persuasion is an art? ______
A.They both entertain the audience.
B.They both require great skills to achieve.
C.They both demand full attention from the audience.
D.They were both common topics of ancient Greek writers.
【小题2】How is a speaker able to show her ethos to the audience? ______
A.By expressing her sympathy with the audience.
B.By telling the audience about her personal preference.
C.By using beautiful language to make her statements attractive.
D.By showing her knowledge and experience relating to the topic.
【小题3】What can we learn about the three aspects of persuasion? ______
A.Ethos is the most important aspect of persuasion.
B.Each aspect has a different effect on the audience.
C.Honesty is the key to making your arguments believable.
D.Political leaders mostly use pathos to persuade their audience.
【小题4】An advertisement for washing powder which claims that “scientific tests show that our powder kills 95% of all bacteria” is mainly using ______ .
A.ethosB.pathos
C.logosD.a combination of all three

The human eye can perceive about 1 million colors, but languages have far fewer words to describe those colors. Languages spoken in industrialized nations such as the United States, for example, tend to have about a dozen basic color terms, while languages spoken by populations in remote areas often have fewer. However, the way that a language divides up color space can be influenced by contact with other languages, according to a new study.

Among members of the Tsimane society, who live in a remote part of the Bolivian Amazon rainforest, the researchers found that those who had learned Spanish as a second language began to classify colors into more words, making color distinctions that are not commonly used by Tsimane who are monolingual (单语的).

In the most striking finding, Tsimane who were bilingual (会双语的) began using two different words to describe blue and green, which monolingual Tsimane speakers do not typically do. The researchers also found that the bilingual Tsimane became more precise in describing colors such as yellow and red, which monolingual speakers tend to use to include many shades (色度) beyond what a Spanish or English speaker would include.

Working with monolingual and bilingual members of the Tsimane, the researchers asked people to perform two different tasks. For the bilingual population, they asked them to do the tasks twice, once in Tsimane and once in Spanish.

In the first task, the researchers showed the subjects 84 chips (块) of different colors, one by one, and asked them what word they would use to describe the color. In the second task, the subjects were shown the entire set of chips and asked to group the chips by color words.

The researchers found that when performing this task in Spanish, the bilingual Tsimane classified colors into the traditional color words of the Spanish language. Additionally, the bilingual speakers were much more precise about naming colors when they performed the task in their native language.

“The bilingual speakers learned a different way to divide up the color space,” says Edward Gibson, the senior author of the study. “It’s a great example of one of the main benefits of learning a second language. You open a different world and understand different concepts that you import to your native language.”

【小题1】What can be inferred about the Tsimane language from paragraph 3?
A.There are very few color words.
B.There used to be no color words.
C.There are no words for blue and green.
D.There are many words for yellow and red.
【小题2】Which of the following indicates a difference between the two tasks?
A.The number of the chips.B.The color of the chips.
C.The way to show the chips.D.The people to perform the tasks.
【小题3】What may explain why the bilingual speakers could name colors precisely when performing the task in Tsimane?
A.The evolution of Tsimane.B.The popularity of Spanish.
C.The influence of Spanish.D.The uniqueness of Tsimane.
【小题4】What is the main idea of the text?
A.Learning language can broaden the mind.
B.Contact between languages can influence each other.
C.Bilingual speakers have more words to describe colors.
D.A language can acquire new concepts from other languages.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网