试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 较难0.4 引用3 组卷323

The age of adulthood is by definition arbitrary. If everyone matured at the same, fixed rate, it wouldn’t be a human process. Indeed, maturation happens at varying speeds across different categories within the same individual, so I’d say I was easily old enough to vote at 16, but nobody should have given me a credit card until I was 32, and I’ve got the county court judgment to prove it.

However, we broadly agree that there’s a difference between a child and an adult, even if we might argue about the transition point. So the political theorist David Runciman’s view that six-year-olds should be allowed to vote goes against any standard argument about the age of civic responsibility. Nobody would say that a six-year-old could be held criminally responsible, could be sent to war, could be capable of consent, could be given responsibility for anything. So allowing them the vote—along with, unavoidably, seven-year-olds who are even sillier, if anything—is quite an amusing proposal.

Runciman’s argument is that this is the only way to rebalance political life, which is currently twisted in favor of the old, who don’t (he added) ever need to demonstrate mental capacity, even long after they’ve lost it.

The first part of his case is self-evident: pensions are protected while children’s centers are closed, concepts such as sovereignty (最高权威) are prioritized over the far more urgent business of the future: climate change. Nostalgia (怀念) for a past the young wouldn’t even recognize plays a central role, which is completely unfair.

Most of the arguments against giving six-year-olds a vote are that children would end up voting for something damaging and chaotic, if someone made unrealistic promises to them, which could never be realized. Well, it’s not children’s fault.

Having said that, children do tend towards the progressive, having a natural sense of justice (which kicks in at the age of six months, psychologists have shown, by creating scenes of great unfairness to babies, and making them cry) and an underdeveloped sense of self-interest. My kid, when he was six, made quite a forceful case against private property, on the basis that, since everybody needed a house, they shouldn’t cost money, because nobody would want anyone else not to have one. Also, food should be free. It was a kind of pre-Marx communism, where you limit the coverage of the market to only those things that you wouldn’t mind someone else not having.

On that particular day, when we were registered as voters, my kid was quite far to the left of me, but in the normal run of things, we’re united, which brings us to the point of the problem: children obey you on almost nothing, but they do seem to believe in your politics until they’re adolescent. So giving kids the vote is really just a way of giving parents extra votes. And what can stop us having even more children, once there’s so much enfranchisement (选举权) in it for us?

Now, if parents could be trusted to use their influence wisely, and hammer into children the politics it will take to assure a better future, then I wouldn’t necessarily have a problem with that, apart from, obviously, that culture is already wildly twisted towards parents, and I can imagine a few non-parents boiling with fierce anger. But that’s not worth talking about anyway, because parents can’t be trusted, otherwise we’d all already vote Green(绿党).

In short: no, six-year-olds should not get the vote; but while we’re here, if any votes come up in the near future, which will have an impact on the next five decades of British political life, alongside EU migrants, 16-year-olds certainly should be enfranchised.

【小题1】The author refers to his age of adulthood to prove that ________.
A.certain rights are granted at different stages of life
B.there’s a common standard for the age of adulthood
C.people mature at different rates in various aspects
D.a credit card is more difficult to get than the vote
【小题2】People reject David Runciman’s proposal because ________.
A.they believe children are far from mature in many ways
B.they are uncertain whether children can assume responsibility
C.they know the age to get the vote is not to be questioned
D.they don’t think a child can grow into adulthood earlier
【小题3】What is the base for David Runciman’s argument?
A.Public ignorance of children’s abilities.B.Inequalities of opportunity.
C.A cultural preference for the old.D.The imbalance in political life.
【小题4】The author talks about his kid to indicate that ________.
A.children are in favor of a just society and tend to be idealistic
B.children are innocent and don’t want to be involved in politics
C.children are simple-minded and can fall for an adult’s trick
D.children are good-natured and like to help people in need
【小题5】The author thinks allowing children the vote may lead to ________.
A.twisted cultureB.parents’ objectionsC.misuse of rightsD.unusual maturation
【小题6】What is the main point of the passage?
A.There is a difference between adults and children.
B.Allowing children the vote is not altogether absurd.
C.The definition of adulthood is quite controversial.
D.Parents should introduce politics to their children.
19-20高三上·天津·阶段练习
知识点:政治政策议论文直接理解逻辑推理文章大意 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Maryland is expected to become the first state of the USA to ban foam (泡沫橡胶)food packaging, takeout containers and cups The new proposed law passed both of the state's legislative bodies (立法机关)this week with enough votes to override a potential rejection signed by Gov. Larry Hogan, who has not publicly signaled whether he supported the law or not. The law would become the latest in a growing effort worldwide to ban kinds of single-use plastic products, due to their impacts on the environment.

With the statewide previous ban effort, Maryland's two counties, Prince George and Montgomery, had already banned foam packaging. Del. Brooke Lierman, who introduced similar legislation last year and in 2017, says changing public opinion helped her third attempt succeed.

“I think we have reached a danger point,” she says. “People are seeing how common single-use plastics are, and that they are not recyclable and never going away. People are beginning to understand the importance of living more sustainably. "

The new law would ban foam food packaging for products packaged in-state, including restaurants, cafes, food trucks, and grocery stores. The final version of the bill includes exceptions, such as meat. The ban would go into force on July 1, 2020 and would carry fines of   $ 250.

The legislation was opposed by the Maryland Retailers Association, which warned that outlawing foam packaging could hurt small businesses by higher costs. Foam packaging remains popular among restaurants and the food industry because it is lightweight, inexpensive, and keeps food and drinks hot.

Foam food containers have been banned in cities or counties in 11 states, including Seattle, Portland, Washington D. C. , San Francisco, and numerous other cities in California. A ban in New York City took effect at the beginning of this year after a long legal battle ended last summer.

【小题1】How did Maryland carry out the ban of foam food packaging?
A.By passing a new law.
B.By fining foam packaging users.
C.By closing some local companies.
D.By teaching people to focus on the environment.
【小题2】What does the underlined word “override" in paragraph 1 mean?
A.Explain.B.Prove.C.Reject.D.Tolerate.
【小题3】What is the key to the third success according to Del. Brooke Lierman?
A.Learning from other cities.B.Getting medium's support.
C.Changing public opinion.D.Hurting small businesses.
【小题4】What can we learn from the text?
A.Foam food packages will disappear in the world.
B.People in Maryland support the law absolutely.
C.Foam food packages haven't any advantage at all.
D.Meat will be allowed to be sold in foam food packages in America.

There is nothing worse than fumbling around in your pocket trying to find some small change to pay for a newspaper or a coffee. So it's good to know that new technology is making cash -bank notes and coins – a thing of the past, turning us into a cashless society.

Today, many of us already use credit and debit cards for financial transactions(交易) so there's no need to carry around hard currency. And now it's possible to make contactless payments using tap-and-go cards which are regular bankcards but with a built-in chip and antenna(天线). The card reader sends out a radio frequency and, when you bring the card close to the reader, the antenna picks up the signal to make the payment.

Paying this way or spending on ' plastic' – an informal name for a credit card – can put you at risk of fraud. Criminals try to steal cards, or the information on them, to make purchases online or in shops. However, contactless payment is capped——in the UK the limit is £30. And, if someone does go on a spending spree with your card, your bank covers you against the loss – something that wouldn't happen if your banknotes were stolen. Also, the introduction of chip and pin technology has led to a drop in fraud and has even been helping businesses by cutting the time people spend at tills in shops.

But, if getting your bankcard out seems like too much trouble, there's now a solution using wearable tech——that's clothing and accessories that include computer and electronic technologies. Kenneth Cukier, economist and technology expert, says "this is intended for people who are incredibly lazy who don't want to take their card out of their wallet, or use their phone, or use their watch. People are going to be making more purchases more of the time – particularly for small-valued goods."

And, although our mobile phones are another way of making payments, BBC reporter Kate Russell says that when this is inconvenient you can use the fingo—pay system which "reads the unique maps of veins under the surface of your finger." The trick is remembering which finger you registered with. What do you prefer to use when you buy something?

【小题1】Which of the following doesn’t belong to the cashless payment?
A.Credit cardsB.Tap-and-go pay
C.spending spreeD.Fingo-pay
【小题2】Many measures have been taken to ensure the credit card holders’ profits EXCEPT_______?
A.Setting a maximum in transactions
B.Using wearable tech
C.Applying chip and pin technology
D.Making up for loss in a fraud
【小题3】What can we learn from Kenneth Cukier’s statement?
A.Contactless payment will promote purchase to some degree.
B.More and more people are too lazy to use bankcard as a way of payment.
C.Wearable tech is safer and thus should replace the credit cards.
D.Only phones and watches can be used as wearable tech to buy things.

Authorities have moved to tighten oversight of the rapidly expanding semi-prepared food industry, ironing out definitions of precooked dishes and rolling out rules on the use of additives in the sector to ensure food safety. Restaurants are also being encouraged to identify dishes on their menus that include semi-prepared ingredients, a move that experts say will help customers make informed decisions.

The reforms, led by the State Administration for Market Regulation, which oversees product quality and consumer rights, were outlined in a circular issued on Thursday by six government agencies.

Share (股票) prices of companies involved in the semi prepared food sector fell by an average of 2 percent on the A-share market on Monday because of the strengthened oversight Industry insiders said the rules were the first to clarify the definition of semi-prepared food and set out safety and quality standards for the multibillion yuan industry.

China has more than 70, 000 companies making food items that have undergone some preparation but are not fully cooked or ready to eat, according to Xinhua News Agency. Their output value topped 500 billion yuan ($69.4 million) last year and is on track to surpass 1 trillion yuan in a few years, it said.

The new rules differentiate between semi-prepared food-also known as prepackaged meals — and other food items, such as instant noodles, frozen dumplings and salads. They say semi-prepared food must be a dish that can be consumed after simple preparations such as heating or boiling.

Experts said makers of frozen foods such as dumplings and hamburgers will no longer be regarded as being semi-prepared food businesses, and will be unable to ignore regulations in their own sector or enjoy preferential policies tailor-made for semi-prepared food makers. They said the generalization of the concept of semi prepared food had previously created regulatory difficulties.

【小题1】Why is it necessary to oversee the semi-prepared food industry?
A.To raise people’s awareness of food safety concerns.
B.To ban the use of semi-prepared prepared ingredients.
C.To guarantee food safety through strengthened regulations.
D.To encourage restaurants to identify dishes on their menus.
【小题2】What is the third paragraph mainly about?
A.Rules aiming to define semi-prepared food.
B.Great loss suffered by semi-prepared food sect on.
C.Safety and quality standards imposed on food industry.
D.Effects on semi-prepared food industry made by the new rules.
【小题3】Which of the following statement is true?
A.Semi-prepared food can be directly consumed.
B.Instant noodles are considered as semi-prepared food.
C.Semi prepared food makers enjoy preferential treatment.
D.Output value of semi-prepared food is decreasing in China.
【小题4】What is the expert’s attitude towards the regulatory reforms?
A.Ambiguous.B.Positive.C.Objective.D.Indifferent.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网