The writings of Shakespeare are today little read by young people in Britain. His young readership is limited to those who choose to study literature at university.
Shakespeare’s work, together with most other classics, is seen as remote, and written in a 400yearold version of English that is about as inviting as toothache.
Still, in Britain schools, it is compulsory to study the bard(诗人), and when something is made compulsory, usually the result is boredom, resentment(憎恨) or both.
This was my experience of the classics at school. But when I reached my late teenage years, I had a change of heart. Like every other young person since the dawn of time, the world confused me. I wanted answers, so I turned to books to find them.
I went on to take a PhD in literature and have taught it in Britain and China. I have never regretted it. There is something in literature that people want, even if they don’t read books. You see this in the popularity of TV and movie adaptations of great works, the recent film version of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice being a case in point. These popular adaptations may help increase people’s interest in the classics.
Reading a simplified Romeo and Juliet may perhaps lead to a reading of Shakespeare’s actual play. If that is the case, then I welcome the trend. But do not make the mistake of thinking that it is the same thing. Shakespeare is a poet. His greatness is in his language. Reading someone else’s rewriting of his work is like peeling a banana, throwing away the fruit, and eating the skin. Take on the original. It really is worth the effort.
【小题1】Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?A.The language used in classics is no longer in use today. |
B.British students usually find compulsory reading dull. |
C.Only those studying literature read Shakespeare’s works. |
D.For British people, Shakespeare’s works are no longer classics. |
A.has liked literary classics since an early age |
B.was forced to read the classics for a PhD |
C.turned to literature to seek answers in his teens |
D.thinks only people who read books like literature |
A.a great hit |
B.a good example |
C.a movie adaptation |
D.a popular phenomenon |
In the winter of 1664-1665, the bitter cold fell on London in the days before 25 December. Above the city, an unusually bright comet (彗星) shot across the sky, exciting much prediction of a snowstorm. Outside the city wall, a woman's death was announced and she died of a disease that was spreading in that area. Her house was locked up.
Following that, the virus that had killed the woman would go on to kill nearly 100,000 people living in and around London— almost a third of those who did not flee.
In The Great Plague: The Story of London's Most Deadly Year, historian A. Lloyd Moote and microbiologist Dorothy C. Moote provide a deeply informed account of this plague year. Reading the book, readers are taken from the palaces of the city's wealthiest citizens to the poor areas where the vast majority of Londoners were living, and to the surrounding countryside. The Mootes point out that, even at the height of the plague, the city did not fall into chaos. Doctors and nurses remained in the city to care for the sick; city officials tried their best to fight the crisis with all the legal tools; and commerce continued even as businesses shut down.
To describe life and death in and around London, the authors focus on the experiences of nine individuals. Through their letters and diaries, the Mootes offer fresh descriptions of key issues in the history of the Great Plague: how different communities understood and experienced the disease; how medical and government bodies reacted; how well the social order held together; the economic and moral dilemmas people faced when debating whether to flee the city; and the nature of the material, social, and spiritual resources supporting those who remained. Based on humanity (人性), the authors offer a masterful portrait of a city and its inhabitants who were attacked by and daringly resisted unimaginable horror.
【小题1】What can we learn from Paragraph 1?A.A comet always follows a storm. |
B.London was under an approaching threat. |
C.London was prepared for the disease. |
D.The woman was the beginning of the disease. |
A.The city remained organized. |
B.The plague spared (饶恕) the rich areas. |
C.The people tried a lot in vain. |
D.The majority fled and thus survived. |
A.They were famous people in history. |
B.They all managed to survive the plague. |
C.They provided vivid stories of humanity. |
D.They united by thinking and acting as one. |
A.To introduce a new book. |
B.To correct a misunderstanding. |
C.To report a new study. |
D.To show respect for the authors. |
Being both mentally and physically fit in old age is partly a matter of luck, but it also has something to do with character. Not every white-haired person is wise and social skills, openness and the ability to train the brain are essential for senior citizens.
Along with the architect Oscar Niemeyer (103), Nobel laureate Montalcini (101) and director Kurt Maetzig (100), Oliveira is one of those people of whom it would be very wrong to think as members of a listless elderly generation.
Another master in his profession is the architect Oscar Niemeyer. The 103-year-old Brazilian is best known for his futuristic-looking buildings in Brasilia, but he also speaks out on behalf of the poor. "The role of the architect is to struggle for a better world where we can develop a form of architecture that serves everyone and not just a privileged few," said Niemeyer recently. He spends almost every day working in his office in Copacabana, and even when he falls ill he keeps working on ideas: After a gallbladder (胆囊) operation he composed a samba tune (桑巴舞曲) in the clinic.
Another man who could sing a song about age is 107-year-old Heesters. The Dutch-born opera singer spent most of his life performing in Germany, where he still works. Recently Heesters said: "I want to be at least 108-years-old." He also plans to keep performing. "Should I just sit at home and wait until they come and pick me up?" Heesters has not given up trying to add to his tally of awards and is looking for a "good stage role".
Italian scientist Rita Levi-Montalcini, who is 101-year-old and is still active in medical science, has described the force that keeps driving her on: "Progress is created through imperfection." In 1986 she and her lab colleague were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for their work on nerve growth factor. She's convinced that humans grow on challenges.
With so many brilliant examples given, we can see clearly that age is no barrier to some high achievers.
【小题1】From the first two paragraphs, we can see ______.
A.being active at 102 is achievable for everybody |
B.Oliveira owes his long life to his mother’s help |
C.social skills and wisdom are difficult for the senior |
D.being fit in old age is a matter of luck and character |
A.4 | B.5 | C.6 | D.7 |
A.wants to sit or lie in comfort |
B.is waiting for people to pick him up |
C.is willing to work till he dies |
D.prefers to give performance at home |
A.old age is a big problem if you want tosucceed |
B.old age can not prevent a great person from achieving a lot |
C.old people should never think of themselves as old |
D.as a senior citizen, you have to be open-minded and optimistic |
A.pessimistic | B.intelligent |
C.positive | D.diligent |
The wife shared in the management of her husband’s personal property, but the opposite was not always true. Women seemed perfectly prepared to defend their own inheritance against husbands who tried to exceed their rights, and on occasion they showed a fine fighting spirit. A case in point is that of Maria Vivas. Having agreed with her husband Miro to sell a field she had inherited, for the needs of the household, she insisted on compensation. None being offered, she succeeded in dragging her husband to the scribe to have a contract duly drawn up assigning her a piece of land from Miro’s personal inheritance. The unfortunate husband was obliged to agree, as the contract says, “for the sake of peace.” Either through the dowry or through being hot-tempered, the wife knew how to win herself, with the context of the family, a powerful economic position.
【小题1】Originally, the purpose of a dowry is to_________.
A.give a woman the right to receive all her husband’s property |
B.help a woman to enjoy a higher position in the family |
C.protect a woman against the risk of desertion |
D.both A and C |
A.higher than that of a single woman |
B.higher than that of her husband |
C.lower than that of her husband |
D.the same as that of her husband |
A.To show that the wife shared in the management of her husbands personal property. |
B.To show that the wife can defend her own inheritance. |
C.To prove that women have powerful position. |
D.To illustrate how women win her property. |
A.some of the land Miro had inherited |
B.a tenth of Miro’s land |
C.money for household expenses |
D.money form Miro’s inheritance |
A.sympathetic | B.disapproval | C.indifferent | D.objective |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网