试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷59

More companies and recyclers are taking steps to ensure that old electronic devices such as TVs and computers aren’t sent to poor countries.

The Basel Action Network, a Seattle-based non-profit that largely exposed the overseas discarding (丢弃) of US electronic waste, on Thursday launched a programme to use third-party employees to certify (证实) recyclers who don’t export dangerous electronic waste.

The so-called e-Steward recyclers will also agree not to discard the waste in US landfills and agree to meet other criteria. The certification is intended to provide companies and consumers with some assurance that the waste, which can include toxins (毒素) such as lead and mercury, is disposed of safely.

The Government Accountability Office, in a 2008 report, declared that US electronic waste was often disposed of unsafely in such countries as India. There, workers recycle gold, silver and copper from the waste, often in open-air acid baths.

The Basel Network also says it won assurances from 13 organizations, including Samsung, Bank of America, Wells Far-go, that they’ll use e-Steward recyclers whenever possible. Wells Fargo had already been using recyclers who declared not to export. So far, Basel has certified three recyclers and seven sites.

Before e-stewards, even, companies that wanted to avoid export of electronic waste had to “hope for the best”, when, they handed their waste to recyclers, says Robert Houghton, president of Ohio-based recycler Redemtech. It is an e-Steward that counts major companies among its customers. “Now, they can get some proof,” Houghton says.

Basel’s standards compete with another set launched in January. It was made by industry and backed by the Environmental Protection Agency.

That standard, called R-2, doesn’t ban the export of dangerous electronic waste but requires that it be handled safely. Instead of a ban, the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries says, efforts should be made to help poor countries develop safe recycling.

【小题1】How were most electronic wastes dealt with before?
A.They were thrown into US landfills.
B.They were buried in the desert m die US.
C.They were exported to poor countries.
D.They were reused by families in poor countries.
【小题2】E-Steward recyclers, main job is probably to ________.
A.prevent old devices from open-air acid baths
B.dispose of electronic waste safely
C.collect more electronic waste for profits
D.assure America’s leading rule in the electronic market
【小题3】People in India import electronic waste to ________.
A.get rid of toxinsB.learn how to make devices
C.recycle valuable metalsD.make cheaper products
【小题4】The passage is mainly about ________.
A.how to deal with old electronic products
B.the development of recycling in the world
C.how to fight against electronic pollution
D.safer treatment of electronic waste
17-18高二上·安徽六安·阶段练习
知识点:环境保护 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Carbon dioxide isn’t just a greenhouse gas that’s thinning the atmosphere, but it’s also causing a popular food to lose its nutritional value over time, which will have a major impact on more than 2 billion people worldwide.

According to a recent study conducted in a joint effort by researchers in Japan, China, Australian, and the United States, higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere contribute to the decline of protein(蛋白质)and other key vitamins in rice. The study, published in the journal Science Advances, looked at 18 different agriculture sites in China and Japan over four years and found that the crops exposed to higher levels of carbon dioxide were overall less nutritious than those that were not.

“Many basic crops are impacted by the rise of carbon dioxide with respect to things like protein concentration and iron and zinc,” says Lewis Ziska, a co-author and research plant physiologist at the US Department of Agriculture. The research explains that the exposed rice contained 10 percent less protein,8 percent less iron, and 5 percent less zinc, while amounts of B1,B2 and B5 vitamins also declined. And increased levels of carbon dioxide doesn’t just have a negative effect on rice, but other food staples(主食)including wheat and potatoes also face serious consequences when exposed to higher levels.

While this certainly impacts many people worldwide, it follows that the people that would suffer the most would be those that consume the most rice, which, as the study also found, also happen to be those who live in the poorest countries.

Additional studies are now underway and researchers are trying to solve this problem by looking at the different types of each crop in hopes of finding the types that react the least, or not at all, to high levels of carbon dioxide.

Until then, what can you do? For starters, you can try to eat a variety of foods and get your vitamins and proteins from various sources. Then to help with the larger problem of global warming and climate change, you can make simple lifestyle changes such as hang drying clothes, walking to work, and turning off the lights when you’re not home.

【小题1】What is the effect of higher levels of carbon dioxide?
A.It increases protein content in rice.B.It causes nutrient loss in crops.
C.It improves agricultural productivity.D.It directly affects people’s health.
【小题2】Who may suffer most from the rise of carbon dioxide?
A.Those who eat the most rice.B.Those who eat wheat and potatoes.
C.Those who live in rich countries.D.Those exposed to higher levels of carbon dioxide.
【小题3】What does the underlined word“underway”in para.5 mean?
A.Under the groundB.Under control
C.In the wayD.In progress
【小题4】How can we solve the problem caused by higher levels of carbon dioxide?
A.By developing new types of crops.
B.By eating more fresh foods.
C.By having different types of foods.
D.By changing the existing lifestyle totally

Ranchers(农场主) and environmental advocates haven’t always seen eye to eye, but the differences between the two aren’t as extreme any more, as more and more ranchers have come around to the understanding that taking good care of the land supports both economic stability and environmental health.

“For some, ranching was pursued in the past with an emphasis on raising beef at the expense of everything else,” says Bill Bryan of the Montana—based Rural Landscape Institute in a recent Christian Science Monitor. “As a matter of necessity, the old way of ranching is giving way to a new pattern. Raising animals for the dinner table isn’t an activity that has to be at odds with the environment.”

According to the nonprofit World Wildlife Fund (WWF), grazing (放牧)—when done right—is key to maintaining biological diversity and ecosystem health across the Northern Great Plains, across 183-million-acre expanse of rangelands spanning five US states and two Canadian provinces.

This vast landscape evolved in harmony with large herbivores (食草动物), such as bison and elk, and must be grazed in order to remain healthy, reports WWF, which works with hundreds of ranchers across the region as part of its Sustainable Ranching Initiative. “Without grazing, woody vegetation, such as juniper and cedar creeps in and kills plants that threatened species, such as grassland birds, need to survive.”

Not surprisingly, many of the ranchers that are following in the forebears’ footsteps have been using what we now call “sustainable ranching practices” for decades already. One example is rotational (轮流的) grazing, that is moving cattle herds more frequently to different pastures(牧场), so they don’t overgraze any one particular patch of land.

A newer “best practice” involves depositing a quarter to half inch of cattle wastes on grazed land to kick-start the soil chemistry below while also absorbing significant amounts of methane (沼气)—the most potent greenhouse gas—before it can head for the atmosphere. This technique is now becoming more commonplace as today’s ranchers care about reducing their carbon footprints like no generation before them.

【小题1】In the first two paragraphs, what does the writer imply about the relationship in the past between ranchers and environmentalists?
A.They worked together to reduce the impact of grazing on the environment.
B.They didn’t look each other in the eyes when they meet.
C.They had great differences between each other.
D.They both agreed that raising animals for food benefits the environment.
【小题2】The underlined phrase “be at odds with” (in Paragraph 2) most probably means ________ from the context.
A.be favourable to
B.be in disagreement with
C.stand a chance with
D.be unusual for
【小题3】Which of the following is TRUE of grazing nowadays?
A.Many ranchers persist in prioritising raising cattle over anything else.
B.Grazing done in the right way helps biological diversity and ecosystem.
C.“Rotational grazing” has been recently employed to raise animals.
D.Grazing contributes to trees competing favourably with plants.
【小题4】The writer mentioned the “best practice” to indicate ________.
A.grazing can be functional in the chemistry field
B.methane is another powerful greenhouse gas besides carbon dioxide
C.ranchers tend to remove their footprints as they are grazing
D.grazing has become more eco-friendly as time goes by

Nine milu deer babies were born in Daqing Mountain National Nature Reserve in April, after 27 deer were relocated in September from two reserves in Nanhaizi, Beijing, and Dafeng, Jiangsu Province.

The milu deer have been brought back from the edge of complete extinction in China since the mid-1980s. The National Forestry and Grassland Administration launched the ambitious conservation program in 2019 to expand the habitat of the species. Experts came to the Daqing nature reserve for inspection, and an area with plenty of food and water was chosen to release (放养) the deer.

For Ma, who works at the Daqing Mountain National Nature Reserve’s management station, it is a new responsibility, but he remains undiscouraged by challenges. He consults experts to understand the species better. According to his observations, the two groups of animals from Nanhaizi and Dafeng are getting along well, and even integrating into one close community. Ma keeps a record of the reserve’s ecological conditions. He has noticed that the plant cover has increased, thanks to the national protection policy and plenty of rainfall in recent years.

“The milu originally lived in the wetlands along the Yellow River and the Yangtze River. This is the first time they have been released in a cold mountainous region, where the winter temperature can drop to -30℃,” says Khorintavan, head of the nature reserve. “The staff had built winter shelters, but the deer never went there. The milu deer have a thick coat, which keeps them warm.” he adds. “The task ahead is to see how well the babies adapt to the new environment.”

The gold and iron mines in the mountains were shut down long ago. Locals are aware of the importance of wildlife conservation, which has enhanced the confidence of experts.

“The birth of babies means that the Daqing Mountain National Nature Reserve is a suitable habitat for the milu deer. It is a reference for us to better develop more potential habitats,” says Guo Qingyun, associate research fellow at the Beijing Milu Ecological Research Center in Nanhaizi.

【小题1】What can be known about the two different deer groups?
A.They may combine to give birth to a baby.
B.They struggle between each other for territories.
C.They live in separate areas in the nature reserve.
D.They were released in the wetlands along rivers.
【小题2】What helped the milu deer escape from the cold?
A.The leafy trees.B.Their thick hair.
C.The rich fat.D.The winter shelters.
【小题3】What is Guo Qingyun’s attitude towards the future of milu deer?
A.Critical.B.Objective.C.Doubtful.D.Positive.
【小题4】What is the suitable title of the text?
A.Wildlife ConservationB.New Hope for Milu Dear
C.Newly built Nature ReserveD.Healthy Growth of Baby Deer

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网