试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 较易0.85 引用1 组卷566

A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.

Most of the cases were decided in sate courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.

Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a “pure accident”. In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.

In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.

As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.

【小题1】Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
A.Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B.Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C.The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D.The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
【小题2】What must have happened after the fire case was settled in court?
A.The railroad compensated for the damage to the immediate buildings.
B.The railroad compensated for all the damage by the fire.
C.The railroad paid nothing for the damaged building.
D.The railroad worker paid for the property damage himself.
【小题3】The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT _____.
A.political powerB.high faresC.economic lossD.indifference
【小题4】What s the passage mainly discuss?
A.Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B.History of the US railroads.
C.Railroad workers’ working rights.
D.Law cases concerning the railroads.
2010·河南郑州·一模
知识点:历史事件说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

The Great Fire of London started in the very early hours of September 1666. In four days it destroyed more than three-quarters of the old city, where most of the houses were wooden and close together. One hundred thousand people became homeless, but only a few lost their lives.

The fire started on Sunday morning in the house of the King’s baker(面包师)in Pudding Lane. The baker, with his wife and family, was able to get out through a window in the roof. A strong wind blew the fire from the bakery(面包房)into a small hotel next door. Then it spread quickly into Thames Street. That was the beginning.

By eight o’clock three hundred houses were on fire. On Monday nearly a kilometer of the city was burning along the River Thames. Tuesday was the worst day. The fire destroyed many well-known buildings, old St Paul’s and the Guildhall among them.

Samuel Pepys, the famous writer, wrote about the fire. People threw their things into the river. Many poor people stayed in their houses until the last moment. Birds fell out of the air because of the heat.

The fire stopped only when the King finally ordered people to destroy hundreds of buildings in the path of the fire. With nothing left to burn, the fire became weak and finally died out.

After the fire, Christopher Wren, the architect(建筑师), wanted a city with wider streets and fine new houses of stone. In fact, the streets are still narrow; but he did build more than fifty churches, among them new St Paul’s.

The fire caused great pain and loss, but after it London was a better place: a city for the future and not just of the past.

【小题1】The underlined word “family” in the second paragraph means       .
A.homeB.children
C.wife and husbandD.wife and children
【小题2】It seems that the writer of the text was most sorry for the fact that       .
A.some people lost their lives
B.the birds in the sky were killed by the fire
C.many famous buildings were destroyed
D.the King’s bakery was burned down
【小题3】Why did the writer cite(引用)Samuel Pepys?
A.Because Pepys was among those putting out the fire.
B.Because Pepys also wrote about the fire.
C.To show that poor people suffered most.
D.To give the reader a clearer picture of the fire.
【小题4】Which of the following were reasons for the rapid spread of the big fire?
a. There was a strong wind.
b. The streets were very narrow.
c. Many houses were made of wood.
d. There was not enough water in the city.
e. People did not discover the fire earlier.
A.a and bB.a, b and c
C.a, b, c and dD.a, b, c, d and e

Dancing until you drop is a well­known saying, but would you really be able to dance until you dropped dead? In 1374, in some European towns, people did exactly that. They were struck by a dancing plague (瘟疫) that forced them to dance.

This phenomenon (现象) was reported to have happened throughout parts of Western Europe, affecting people from the 14th to the 17th century. Hardly stopping to eat or even sleep, they would dance, sometimes for days on end, making this one of the strangest sicknesses in Western history.

Over the next century, there were only a few outbreaks. However, in the summer of 1518, it reappeared in the city of Strasbourg, France. It all began with a woman called Mrs. Troffea, who started to dance crazily in the street.

She was soon joined by 34 people within a week; by the end of the month, the crowd had increased to 400, most of whom were women. Again, people were dancing until they could no longer continue, with some finally dying from heart attacks or exhaustion. One report shows that the plague was killing around 15 people per day.

As the plague worsened, concerned nobles (贵族) turned to the advice of local doctors, who said that the plague was a “natural disease” caused by “hot blood”. So the nobles encouraged more dancing.

The reason behind their actions was they believed the dancers could only recover if they danced continuously night and day. The nobles even paid for musicians to keep the moving.

Then, as before, it disappeared almost as suddenly as it had come.

While these events may sound highly unbelievable, there is clear written evidence that it did happen.

Now, historians and scientists are still trying to find out the true cause of this phenomenon.

【小题1】What do we know about the plague?
A.It cost some people's lives.
B.It took place twice in history.
C.It affected people of all ages.
D.It stopped in the 16th century.
【小题2】Why did the nobles encourage more dancing?
A.To see the hot blood.
B.To kill the dancing people.
C.To free people of the plague.
D.To prove the doctors' words.
【小题3】How did the plague disappear?
A.For no reason.
B.With local doctors' help.
C.With Mrs. Troffea's help.
D.Because of some natural power.
【小题4】What's the purpose of the text?
A.To show the history of dancing.
B.To introduce a well­known English saying.
C.To provide information on the dancing plague.
D.To explain the reason behind the dancing plague.

On December 22, 1775, two of Washington’s soldiers brought a prisoner to his headquarters (司令部). Washington thanked the soliders, then gave an order that the prisoner was to be left alone and that the soldiers were to shoot if the man tried to escape. But when the door was closed, Washington smiled.

The man standing in front of him was John Honeyman, one of the general’s most trusted men. In early November, Washington had given Honeyman orders to travel with the British army as a servant and to stay with it until he had something to tell. Honeyman now had important information. He described the situation in Trenton, giving the exact number and position of the troops there.Trenton was held by several companies (连队) of Hessians (雇佣军). The Hessians were not English soldiers.They were Germans who had been hired by the British to fight in America. According to Honeyman, the Hessians fought only for money. They had done nothing to build up their defences in Trenton. Now they were busy planning a big Christmas celebration.

Washington immediately made a daring plan. He chose Christmas Day for an attack on Trenton. At ten o'clock next morning, the attack was over. The Americans won a great victory.

【小题1】Why did Washington smile when the door was closed?
A.Because he was glad to catch the prisoner.
B.Because the man was one of his most trusted men.
C.Because he had caught the most dangerous spy.
D.Because he knew the man very well.
【小题2】For what did Washington send Honeyman to stay with the British army?
A.Honeyman could make peace with the Brilhish soldiers.
B.He could let Honeyman have a pleasant trip.
C.He could catch more prisoners from the British army.
D.Honeyman could get important information for American.
【小题3】Which countries did the war break out between?
A.America and Britain.
B.America and Germany.
C.Britain and Gennany.
D.Arnerica, Britain and Germany.
【小题4】What’s the reason that Washington chose Christmas Day for an attack on Trenton?
A.It could be that it was a lucky day.
B.It might be that it was the best Christmas gift for Britain.
C.It must be that after the day the enemy was to escape.
D.It could be that the enemy would enjoy their holiday but not prepare to fight.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网