Tech companies, like Microsoft, Dell, HP and Motorola, have already begun making their devices more repairable, getting ahead of Right to Repair laws that are very likely on the way. A sure sign is the order signed last year by the president of the USA. It directed the Federal Trade Commission to create Right to Repair rules.
In the past, Microsoft has actively lobbied (游说) against Right to Repair bills, but surprisingly, in October, Microsoft agreed to expand its repair choices, supplying access to parts and information needed for repairs. They have promised to make parts and service manuals available to the public by the end of 2022. Microsoft even promised to conduct a study evaluating the environmental impact of device repairability. “This is the first time we have seen a major company step up and make the promise,” says Kyle Wiens, CEO of repair guide site iFixit. “ Amazingly, instead of telling the activist shareholders to go away, Microsoft said we’re gonna do it.”
Right to Repair is a global movement that advocates for people’s right to repair their own electronic devices and extend the life of the devices. Advocates believe this is going to help solve the pressing problem of e-waste—used electronics that people no longer want — which is a major source of pollution. Activists advocate for laws that will force makers to increase device repairability.
The shareholders advocacy group called As You Sow drove Microsoft to increase device repairability using a tool often employed by climate activists. As shareholders, climate activists often introduce resolutions that other shareholders can vote on, thereby forcing companies to make changes. “It’s a smart strategy to use your position as a shareholder to raise these kinds of issues, because it demands a company response,” says Aaron Perzanowski, a law professor.
The positive response from companies like Microsoft, Perzanowski says, could be linked to a combination of public pressure, a desire to get ahead of upcoming laws and a growing understanding of the problem of electronic waste.
【小题1】What can we infer about Right to Repair laws in the USA?| A．They have a very long way to go. | B．They are ignored by the president. |
| C．They may be adopted soon. | D．They are rejected by most tech companies. |
| A．To reduce the cost of electronic devices. |
| B．To increase the lifespan of electronic devices through repairability. |
| C．To force manufacturers to produce more durable devices. |
| D．To encourage consumers to buy new devices more frequently. |
| A．The high cost of electronic devices. | B．The environmental impact of e-waste. |
| C．The limited lifespan of electronic devices. | D．The lack of skilled repair technicians. |
| A．By introducing a resolution that other shareholders could vote on. |
| B．By convincing Microsoft to increase the price of their devices. |
| C．By threatening to boycott Microsoft's products. |
| D．By lobbying the Federal Trade Commission on behalf of Microsoft. |
