试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 0.4 引用2 组卷270

We often think about relationships on a scale from positive to negative. We are drawn to loving family members, caring classmates and supportive mentors. We do our best to avoid the cruel uncle, the playground bully and the jerk boss.

But the most harmful relationships aren’t the purely negative ones. They’re the ones that are a mix of positive and negative. We often call them frenemies, supposed friends who sometimes help you and sometimes hurt you. But it’s not just friends. It’s the in-laws who volunteer to watch your kids but devalue your parenting. The manager who praises your work but denies you a promotion.

Groundbreaking research led by the psychologists Bert Uchino and Julianne Holt-Lunstad shows that ambivalent (矛盾情绪的) relationships can be damaging to your health — even more than purely negative relationships.

Even a single ambivalent interaction can cause harm. In one experiment, people talked about controversial (具有争议性的) topics in front of a friend who offered feedback. The researchers had randomly assigned the friend to give ambivalent or negative comments. Receiving mixed feedback caused higher blood pressure than pure criticism. “I would have gone about the topic differently, but you’re doing fine” proved to be more distressing than “I totally disagree with everything you’ve said.”

The evidence that ambivalent relationships can be bad for us is obvious, but the reasons can be harder to read — just like the relationships themselves.

One reason is that ambivalent relationships are unpredictable. With a clear enemy, you put up a shield when you cross paths. With a frenemy, you never know whether Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde is going to show up. Feeling unsure can break the body’s calming system and activate a fight-or-flight response. It’s unsettling to hope for a hug while also preparing for a likely quarrel.

Another factor is that unpleasant interactions are more painful in an ambivalent relationship. It’s more distressing to be let down by people you like sometimes than by people you dislike all the time. When someone stabs you in the back, it stings more if he’s been friendly to your face.

【小题1】Which of the following can be considered as a frenemy?
A.Your neighbor’s kid who advises you to study hard but kill his own time.
B.Your classmate who admires your hard work at first, but doubts your intelligence later.
C.Your mother’s friend who encourages you to spend more time on homework but less on smart phones.
D.Your father’s colleague who proposes you to do a reasonable amount of homework while ensuring enough sleep.
【小题2】What does the underlined word “distressing” in Paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.Upsetting.B.Satisfying.C.Inspiring.D.Confusing.
【小题3】Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
A.The negative impact of ambivalent interactions is strong.
B.Ambivalent relationships have a long-lasting effect on your well-being.
C.The common cause of high blood pressure is ambivalent relationship.
D.Interactions in ambivalent relationships are more painful than those in negative ones.
【小题4】What is the passage mainly about?
A.Negative relationships are bad for health.B.Ambivalent relationships are unpredictable.
C.Ambivalent Relationships are the most harmful.D.Positive relationships are better than negative ones.
23-24高一下·重庆·阶段练习
知识点:社会关系科普知识 说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!