试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 较难0.4 引用2 组卷168

We often think about relationships on a scale from positive to negative. We are drawn to loving family members, caring classmates and supportive mentors. We do our best to avoid the cruel uncle, the playground bully and the jerk boss.

But the most harmful relationships aren’t the purely negative ones. They’re the ones that are a mix of positive and negative. We often call them frenemies, supposed friends who sometimes help you and sometimes hurt you. But it’s not just friends. It’s the in-laws who volunteer to watch your kids but devalue your parenting. The manager who praises your work but denies you a promotion.

Groundbreaking research led by the psychologists Bert Uchino and Julianne Holt-Lunstad shows that ambivalent (矛盾情绪的) relationships can be damaging to your health — even more than purely negative relationships.

Even a single ambivalent interaction can cause harm. In one experiment, people talked about controversial (具有争议性的) topics in front of a friend who offered feedback. The researchers had randomly assigned the friend to give ambivalent or negative comments. Receiving mixed feedback caused higher blood pressure than pure criticism. “I would have gone about the topic differently, but you’re doing fine” proved to be more distressing than “I totally disagree with everything you’ve said.”

The evidence that ambivalent relationships can be bad for us is obvious, but the reasons can be harder to read — just like the relationships themselves.

One reason is that ambivalent relationships are unpredictable. With a clear enemy, you put up a shield when you cross paths. With a frenemy, you never know whether Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde is going to show up. Feeling unsure can break the body’s calming system and activate a fight-or-flight response. It’s unsettling to hope for a hug while also preparing for a likely quarrel.

Another factor is that unpleasant interactions are more painful in an ambivalent relationship. It’s more distressing to be let down by people you like sometimes than by people you dislike all the time. When someone stabs you in the back, it stings more if he’s been friendly to your face.

【小题1】Which of the following can be considered as a frenemy?
A.Your neighbor’s kid who advises you to study hard but kill his own time.
B.Your classmate who admires your hard work at first, but doubts your intelligence later.
C.Your mother’s friend who encourages you to spend more time on homework but less on smart phones.
D.Your father’s colleague who proposes you to do a reasonable amount of homework while ensuring enough sleep.
【小题2】What does the underlined word “distressing” in Paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.Upsetting.B.Satisfying.C.Inspiring.D.Confusing.
【小题3】Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
A.The negative impact of ambivalent interactions is strong.
B.Ambivalent relationships have a long-lasting effect on your well-being.
C.The common cause of high blood pressure is ambivalent relationship.
D.Interactions in ambivalent relationships are more painful than those in negative ones.
【小题4】What is the passage mainly about?
A.Negative relationships are bad for health.B.Ambivalent relationships are unpredictable.
C.Ambivalent Relationships are the most harmful.D.Positive relationships are better than negative ones.
23-24高一下·重庆·阶段练习
知识点:社会关系科普知识 说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐
阅读下面短文,根据题目要求回答问题。

The most popular course at Yale University is Psych 157: Psychology and the Good Life. Taught by Professor Laurie Santos, the course covers the science of happiness and how to apply it. Since its launch in 2018, it’s been taken by a quarter of Yale students and more than 200,000 others in its online version. It clearly shows that, in the busy and noisy modern life, we all have a strong desire for happiness.

Why don’t more of us find it. For the complete answer to that, you’ll have to take the course and it’s free. But in recent New York Times interview, Santos suggested one way among of us often go wrong when seeking happiness.

Many of us are trying to be a little gentler with ourselves and prioritizing self-care. That’s a sensible strategy, Santos agrees. The trouble is how people understand “self-care.”

“We assume that self-care looks like a nice bubble bath--- or even selfish pursuits.”

Santos says. "But the data suggests that the right way to treat ourselves would be to do nice things for other people. We actually get more out of being more open and more social and more other oriented than spending money on ourselves, It’s a bigger increase to your happiness.”

Santos isn’t the only scientist pointing out that, if you want to be happier, you should focus more on kindness to others than kindness to yourself, though sell-acceptance is certainly nice too. Research out of Oxford University confirms that even tiny acts of kindness can have profound effects on out happiness, and other studies show small acts of kindness can ripple out, boosting mental well-being in the wider community.

Kindness isn’t just good for your mental health. It’s been shown to have a big impact on our physical health too. You’ll recover more quickly after a heart attack, for instance, if your boss is supportive and friendly.

All of these effects are rooted in a simple truth: Humans are social creatures and we just function better when we feel connected to a community.

【小题1】What is the most popular course at Yale University?
【小题2】What’s the problem with many of us when seeking happiness?
【小题3】Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why.
If we want to increase our happiness, we should focus on kindness and avoid self-care.
【小题4】How will you apply Professor Laurie Santo’s ideas to seek happiness in your life?

The spotlight(聚光灯) effect refers to the tendency of individuals to overestimate the level of attention they believe they get. They think that they are noticed by everyone, everywhere, and at every point of time. This is surprisingly common, but not at all a fact.

Suppose it’s your friend’s birthday, and you have planned to give her a surprise. You are just about to burst into her house at midnight with a delicious cake and an exciting gift. But as your friend opens the door, she just asks you to get inside the house! How would you feel? Exactly that! You have been struck with the spotlight effect! That simply means that you think you did a great job, and people should value your genius ideas on “how to surprise your dear friend on her birthday”. Not really, as your friend was already expecting you to be there! So, your efforts didn’t get as much attention as you had probably expected.

It is often the case. For example, something like a social gaffe(失态)at a ceremony, a stupid error while making a speech, or having a stain on the clothes when facing a bunch of people. These events become unforgettable memories for us, but are often unnoticed by many. Of course, we still feel they are the biggest mistakes of our lives!

On the contrary, sometimes, it happens that actions like a well-prepared presentation, a brilliant argument in a discussion, or the best throw in a football match are extraordinary efforts for us, which just remain totally overlooked. And you think, “Did anyone just see what I did?” or “Was I the only one present there?” No point losing heart, because that was probably just your perception(认识)—— the spotlight effect.

【小题1】Which of the following best explains the spotlight effect?
A.You are too sensitive to others’ remarks.
B.You always think you are being observed.
C.You try to keep off strong light from the sun.
D.You feel you are noticed more than you actually are.
【小题2】What will probably happen to those struck with the spotlight effect?
A.They will become selfish in life.
B.They will doubt others’ good purposes.
C.They will forget unpleasant things easily.
D.They will have trouble letting go of their errors.
【小题3】How will people feel as a result of the spotlight effect according to the last paragraph?
A.Disappointed.B.Lucky.C.Nervous.D.Confident.
【小题4】How is the text mainly developed?
A.By listing experiments.B.By analyzing statistics.
C.By providing examples.D.By making comparisons.

Building Trust in a Relationship Again

Trust is a learned behavior that we gain from past experiences.【小题1】Trust is a risk. But you can’t be successful when there’s a lack of trust in a relationship that results from an action where the wrongdoer takes no responsibility to fix the mistake.

Unfortunately, we’ve all been victims of betrayal. Whether we’ve been stolen from, lied to, misled, or cheated on, there are different levels of losing trust. Sometimes people simply can’t trust anymore.【小题2】It’s understandable, but if you’re willing to build trust in a relationship again, what can you do?【小题3】

●Learn to really trust yourself. Having confidence in yourself will help you make better choices because you can see what the best outcome would be for your well-being.

【小题4】If you’ve been betrayed, you are the victim of your circumstance. But there’s a difference between being a victim and living with a "victim mentality". At some point in all of our lives, we’ll have our trust tested or violated.

● You didn’t lose "everything". Once trust is lost, what is left? Instead of looking at the situation from this hopeless angle, look at everything you still have and be thankful for all of the good in your life.【小题5】 Instead, it’s a healthy way to work through the experience to allow room for positive growth and forgiveness.

A.It is putting confidence in someone.
B.Believe in yourself.
C.Here are some tips for you.
D.Stop regarding yourself as the victim.
E.They’ve been too badly hurt and they can’t bear to let it happen again.
F.Seeing the positive side of things doesn’t mean you’re ignoring what happened
G.This knowledge carries over in their attitude toward their future relationships.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网