试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷81

Scientists discovered that fewer humpback whales made the singing noises, as their population grew. “It was getting more difficult to actually find singers,” marine biologist Rebecca Dunlop in Brisbane said. She added, “When there were fewer of them, there was a lot of singing-now that there are lots of them, no need to be singing so much.”

Eastern Australia’s humpback whales came close to disappearing in the 1960s. With the end of commercial whaling (捕鲸), the population began to regrow, climbing to about 27,000 whales by 2015. That number is near estimated pre-whaling levels. As the density (密度) of whales increased, their singing behaviors changed. While 2 in 10 males made crying noises in 2004, 10 years later the number had dropped to 1 in 10, Dunlop said.

The team’s study appeared in a recent issue of Nature Communications Biology. Dunlop said she thinks singing played a big part in bringing in mates when populations severely declined. When humpbacks live in denser populations, males looking for mates also have to deal with competing whales.

Boris Worm, an ocean biologist, was not involved in the research. “As animal populations recover, they change their behavior-they have different cries,” Worm said. The research suggests the seas are still noisy with humpback whale sounds.

Many humpbacks seek to bring in mates with a combination of singing and physical movements, the study notes. The large increase in the humpback population during the study period provided valuable data about changes in the animals’ behavior and they must have been singers long before whaling reduced their numbers, said Simon Ingram. But the new study demonstrates (证明) how necessary their complex and beautiful songs were to their survival and recovery, he added.

【小题1】Which may make humpback whales sing in the discovery?
A.The power of waves.B.The use of microphone.
C.The feeling of loneliness.D.The increase of their numbers.
【小题2】What does Paragraph 2 mainly say about humpback whales?
A.Their sudden disappearance.B.Their sharp rise in numbers.
C.Their being well protected.D.Their change in behaviors.
【小题3】What does the underlined word “declined” in Paragraph 3 mean?
A.Increased.B.Dropped.C.Climbed.D.Recovered.
【小题4】Which does Simon Ingram agree?
A.Humpbacks’ behaviors have never changed.
B.Humpbacks’ numbers increased by whaling.
C.Humpbacks’ singing noises are important.
D.Humpbacks’ singing will disappear soon.
22-23高一下·四川德阳·期末
知识点:动物科普知识 说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Australia’s Great Barrier Reef has lost more than half of its corals since 1995 due to warmer seas driven by climate change, a study has found. Scientists found all types of corals had suffered a decline across the world’s largest reef system. The sharp falls came after mass bleaching(白化)events in 2016 and 2017. More mass bleaching occurred this year. “There is no time to lose-we must sharply decrease greenhouse gas emissions ASAP,” the researchers said.

The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, was conducted by marine scientists at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies in Queensland. Scientists assessed the health and size of coral colonies across the reef from 1995 to 2017. They found populations had dropped by more than 50% in all coral sizes and species, but especially in branching and table-shaped corals. These are the large, structural species which usually provide habitats for fish and other marine life.

Prof Terry Hughes, a study co-author, said these coral types had been “worst affected” by the back-to-back mass bleachings which damaged two-thirds of the reef. Bleaching occurs when corals under stress drive out the algae-known as zooxanthellae(虫黄藻)-that give them colour.

Corals can recover if normal conditions return, but it can take decades. A study in 2019 found that damaged coral colonies had struggled to recover because most of the adult corals had died. “A lifeful coral population has millions of small, baby corals, as well as many large ones,” said lead author Dr Andy Dietzel. “Our results show the ability of the Great Barrier Reef to recover its resilience is compromised compared to the past, because there are fewer babies, and fewer large breeding adults.”

【小题1】What has been found in the study of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef ?
A.All types of corals has been on the rise.
B.Over half of its corals have been lost.
C.Mass bleaching events came after the sharpest falls.
D.The variety of sea creatures has dropped.
【小题2】What caused mass bleaching of corals?
A.Greenhouse gas emissions.B.Loss of habitats.
C.Evolution of corals.D.Lack of algae.
【小题3】Which word can best describe Dr Andy Dietzel’s attitude to the Great Barrier Reef’s future?
A.Indifferent.B.Concerned.C.Positive.D.Enthusiastic.
【小题4】Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its corals since 1995.
B.Great Barrier Reef has suffered mass bleaching.
C.Global Warming has caused warmer seas.
D.Sea pollution has caused the loss of corals.

Any snakebite can be dangerous if infection sets in. some types of snake poison make the bite area swollen(肿胀的) or painful. Others cause bleeding or damage the heart’s nerves. Here are some especially dangerous snakes:

The largest of all poisonous snakes, king cobras can reach 5.5 meters in length. Each king cobra bits contains enough poison to kill an elephant -- or 20 people. But these big snakes usually avoid people. They live throughout India, southern China and Southeast Asia.

A bite from Australia’s inland taipan, the world’s most poisonous snake, releases enough poison to kill 100 men. The good news is that people rarely come in contact with this snake, and a treatment for its poison exists.

Russell’s viper lives throughout Asia, including India, southern China, and on the island of Taiwan. It prefers grassy fields but can be found in forests and urban areas. It bites more people and causes more deaths than any other poisonous snake.

Though short, the common Indian krait packs a powerful punch(攻击) in its bite. Most often, it strikes people at night while they are sleeping. Since the bite causes little pain, victims are often not sure that they have been bitten until they begin to experience stomach cramps(痉挛). Without treatment, symptoms will worsen quickly and can lead to death.

The black mamba, a native of Africa, is actually olive or grey in color. Only the inside of its mouth is black. When black mambas feel threatened by a human, they make a loud hissing sound to warn the person away. If the warning is ignored, the snake will attack the person repeatedly. And they can attack quickly, moving over the ground at speeds of up to 20 kilometers per hour.

【小题1】According to this article, which of the following is known for its speed?
A.The inland taipan.B.The black mamba.
C.The Indian Krait.D.The Russell’s viper.
【小题2】What does the article imply about the inland taipan?
A.It was once believed to be extinct.B.A chance meeting with it could be fatal.
C.Some people keep one as a pet.D.Very little is know about its behavior.
【小题3】In which magazine would you most likely find this article?
A.Let’s Explore Nature.B.Weekly Travel Digest.
C.Psychology Magazine.D.Global Warning News.

More than 20 years ago, a skeleton called Little Foot turned up in a South African cave. The nearly complete skeleton was a member of the human family. Now researchers have freed most of the skeleton from its stony shell and analyzed the fossils (化石) and they say 3.67-million-years-old Little Foot belonged to a unique species.

Researcher Ronald Clarke and his colleagues think Little Foot belonged to A. Prometheus (普罗米修斯南猿). Clarke works at the university of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg South Africa. He studies fossilized humans and our relatives. Their foundings, published in four papers, have suggested the species A.Prometheus might have existed. Clarke has believed in that species for more than a decade, he found the first Little Foot’s remains in a storage box of fossils in 1994. People began digging out the rest of the skeleton in 1997.

Many other researchers instead argue that Little Foot likely belonged to a different species, which is known as A.africanus (南方古猿非洲种). Researcher Raymond Dart first identified A.africanus in 1924. He was studying the skull (头颅骨) of an ancient youngster called the Taung Child. Since then, people have turned up hundreds more A. africanus fossils in South African caves. Those include Sterkfontein, where Little Foot was found.

The braincase is the part of the skull that holds the brain. And researchers found a partial braincase that Dart thought belonged to a different species in Makapansgat, one of those other caves. In 1948, Dart called this other species A. Prometheus, but he changed his mind after 1955. Instead, he said that braincase and another fossil at Makapansgat belonged to A.africanus. There was no A. Prometheus after all, he concluded.

Clarke and his colleagues want to bring back the rejected species. They say Little Foot’s distinctive skeleton, an adult female that is at least 90 percent complete, is solid evidence for it.

【小题1】Which of the following beliefs did Ronald Clarke hold?
A.A. Prometheus wasn’t a human species.
B.Little Foot didn’t belonged to the human family.
C.Little Foot was one member of A. Prometheus.
D.A. Prometheus lived over four million years ago.
【小题2】What can we learn about A. Prometheus?
A.There wasn’t much evidence of it.
B.Its fossil were first discovered in 1948.
C.It’s a species that’s believed to have existed.
D.The Taung Child wasn’t its first known member.
【小题3】What’s Dart’s most probable attitude toward the existence of A. Prometheus now?
A.UncertainB.Supportive
C.UninterestedD.Disapproving
【小题4】What is the best title for the text?
A.The Skeleton Little Foot Causing a Big Debate.
B.Two New Human Species Accidentally Discovered.
C.More Human Fossils Being Dug Up In Sterkfontein.
D.Little Foot From Makapansgat Drawing New Attention.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网