What does it mean to be intelligent? If it’s defined by having the biggest brain, then sperm whales—whose brain is 20 pounds—would be the brightest creatures on Earth. But, more likely, intelligence is what gives an organism the best chance to survive in an environment. Language may be one of the best ways to demonstrate that kind of smarts. Though all animals can communicate with others, humans are one of the few species to have a spoken language. Using speech, we could share complex ideas, pass knowledge through generations, and create communities. Whether spoken language actually helped us evolve (进化) as species into more advanced beings, however, has never really been tested.
“Language allowing humans to be a more advanced species is an assumption that somebody came up with one day without really trying to prove it,” says Erich Jarvis, a professor who studies the neurobiology of vocal learning.
But Jarvis and his colleagues were able to examine this assumption with the help of songbirds. Jarvis’ new study provides some of the first evidence that vocal learning—one of the crucial components for a spoken language—is associated with problem-solving. Vocal learning is the ability to produce new sounds by imitating (模仿) others, relying on experience rather than instinct.
To get a better grasp of vocal learning and cognition (认知), the study authors turned to songbirds. The team performed seven cognitive experiments on 214 songbirds from 23 different species. Of these, 21 species were caught from the wild. Two songbirds studied are domesticated. The behavioral tests examined the birds’ problem solving, for instance by figuring out how to remove an object to access the food reward. The researchers also tested two other skills often associated with intelligence: learning by association, plus what’s called reversal (倒转的) learning, in which an animal adjusts its behavior to get a reward. They then looked at whether being vocal learners helped develop the three skills, comparing 21 bird species to two others, which were vocal non-learners.
The biologists noticed a strong relationship between vocal learning and problem-solving skills. Vocal learning bird species could come up with innovative ideas, such as getting seeds, or a worm trapped under a cup by removing the obstacle or pulling it apart. All three abilities—problem solving, associative learning, and reversal learning—are typically considered “components of intelligence,” he says.
Brain size was another benefit to vocal learning that may have supported these problem-solving abilities. The 21 vocal-learning species had slightly larger brains, relative to their body size, than the two who weren’t. Jarvis says it’s possible these big-headed birds packed more neurons.
One question left unanswered is why there’s such a strong relationship between problem-solving abilities and vocal learning. The brain areas in charge of vocal learning are not the same ones that get activated when we need to troubleshoot an issue, says Jarvis.
【小题1】The purpose of the first paragraph is to ______.A.promote a new theory | B.offer an example |
C.present an assumption | D.make a contrast |
A.To examine the problem-solving ability of songbirds. |
B.To prove the significance of vocal learning to humans. |
C.To illustrate the influence of brain size on vocal learning. |
D.To test the relation between vocal learning and intelligence. |
A.Advanced species have better problem-solving ability. |
B.Vocal learners have a better development of intelligence. |
C.Better problem-solving ability leads to bigger brain size. |
D.Humans and songbirds are both good at vocal learning. |
A.why humans’ problem-solving abilities develop better |
B.how other abilities are connected to songbirds’ intelligence |
C.how problem-solving and vocal learning brain areas are related |
D.why vocal learning differences exist in various songbirds species |
Men with shaved heads are perceived to be more masculine, dominant and, in some cases, to have greater leadership potential than those with longer locks or with thinning hair, according to a recent study out of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.
Some executives say the style makes them appear younger — or at least, makes their age less evident — and gives them more confidence than a comb-over or monk-like pate.
Wharton management lecturer Albert Mannes conducted three experiments to test peoples’ perceptions of men with shaved heads. In one of the experiments, he showed 344 subjects photos of the same men in two versions: one showing the man with hair and the other showing him with his hair digitally removed, so his head appears shaved.
The study found that men with thinning hair were viewed as the least attractive and powerful of the bunch, a finding that tracks with other studies showing that people perceive men with typical male-pattern baldness as older and less attractive. For those men, the solution could be as cheap and simple as a shave.
New York image consultant Julie Rath advises her clients to get closely cropped when they start thinning up top. “There’s something really strong, powerful and confident about laying it all bare,” she says, describing the thinning or combed-over look as “kind of schlumpy.”
【小题1】Which kind of people are more likely to be regarded as leaders?A.People with long hair. | B.People with thinning hair. |
C.People with shaved heads. | D.People with young appearance. |
A.To see people’s opinions on men with shaved heads. |
B.To distinguish 344 different photos. |
C.To show how people’s hair is digitally removed. |
D.To persuade people to keep their hair. |
A.To have a comb-over hairstyle. | B.To have a shave. |
C.To make their hair thin. | D.To have a simple haircut. |
A.Technology | B.Business | C.Environment | D.Lifestyle |
Social scientists believe storytelling made up 80 percent of the fireside conversations of our ancestors. The firelight talk might have started 400,000 years ago, but our brains are still excited for stories today.
The most inspiring leaders in history were storytellers: John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Ronald Reagan, Nelson Mandela, Henry Ford, and Steve Jobs.
Many of the storytellers have changed the course of history. Some are business heroes. Some have inspired movements.
Storytelling is the fundamental building block of communication. In a world where people are provided with too many choices, the story is often the deciding factor in whom we decide to do business with.
A.We’re all storytellers |
B.Of course, the tools have changed |
C.Above all, they are all dream makers |
D.We’ve been sharing stories for thousands of years |
E.It’s very important for us to learn the storytellers’ secrets |
F.Many of today’s most inspiring business leaders are also storytellers |
G.Those who are good at telling stories have a great influence over others |
Since English biologist Charles Darwin (1809 –1882) published On the Origin of Species in 1859, scientists have vastly improved their knowledge of natural history. However, a lot of information is still the subject of speculation, and scientists can still only make educated guesses at certain things.
One subject that they guess about is why some 400 million years ago, animals in the sea developed limbs (肢) that allowed them to move onto and live on land.
Recently, an idea that occurred to the US paleontologist (古生物学家) Alfred Romer a century ago became a hot topic once again.
Romer thought that tidal (潮汐的) pools might have led to fish gaining limbs. Sea animals would have been forced into these pools by strong tides. Then, they would have been made either to adapt to their new environment close to land or die. The fittest among them grew to accomplish the transition (过渡) from sea to land. Romer thought that tidal pools might have led to fish gaining limbs.
Romer called these earliest four-footed animals “tetrapods” (四足动物). Science has always thought that this was a credible theory, but only recently has there been strong enough evidence to support it.
Hannah Byrne is an oceanographer (海洋学家) at Uppsala University in Sweden. She announced at the 2018 Ocean Sciences Meeting in Oregon, US, on Feb 15 that by using computer software, her team had managed to link Romer’s theory to places where fossil deposits (化石沉积) of the earliest tetrapods were found.
According to the magazine Science, in 2014, Steven Balbus, a scientist at the University of Oxford in the UK, calculated that 400 million years ago, when the move from land to sea was achieved, tides were stronger than they are today. This is because the planet was 10 percent closer to the moon than it is now.
The creatures stranded in the pools would have been under the pressure of “survival of the fittest”, explained the UK’s University of Bangor ocean scientist Mattias Green. As he told Science: “After a few days in these pools, you become food or you run out of food … the fish that had large limbs had an advantage because they could flip (空翻) themselves back in the water”.
As is often the case, however, there are others who find the theory less convincing. Cambridge University paleontologist Jennifer Clark, speaking to Nature magazine, seemed unconvinced. “It’s only one of many ideas for the origin of land-dwelling (陆地栖息的) tetrapods, any or all of which may have been a part of the answer,” she said.
【小题1】Who first proposed the theory that fish might have gained limbs because of tidal pools?A.Charles Darwin. | B.Alfred Romer. | C.Hannah Byrne. | D.Steven Balbus. |
A.There were larger oceans. | B.Earth was under greater pressure. |
C.The moon gave off more energy. | D.Earth was closer to the moon. |
A.Trapped. | B.Settled. | C.Survived. | D.Adapted. |
A.The proposal of a new scientific theory. |
B.The arguments over a scientific theory. |
C.Some new evidence to support a previous theory. |
D.A new discovery that questions a previous theory. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网