Deforestation in tropical (热带的) regions of Asia, Africa and the Americas has reduced the cooling effects of trees. “The temperature change associated with deforestation over the 15-year study period is equal to a century of global warming, happening almost instantly, at these locations,” says Luke Parsons at Duke University in North Carolina.
Now, by using data from population surveys and mapping tree cover loss over a 15-year period, Parsons and his colleagues have estimated the effect of deforestation on outdoor workers across 41 countries. He says climate change has already pushed tropical locations right to the edge of what would be considered safe for heavy outdoor labour and that deforestation causes those locations to be even more precarious.
Parsons and his colleagues used land surface temperature measurements from satellites, and collected humidity (湿度) data, to estimate how hot an average day felt to outdoor workers in regions which either lost or maintained tree cover between 2003 and 2018. “The study focuses on what you would think of as a ‘feels-like’ temperature. It takes into account how well you can cool yourself by sweating, which is affected by humidity, as well as the temperature,” says Parsons.
The researchers then turned to population surveys to estimate the number of outdoor workers in these areas. This revealed that some 2.5 million outdoor workers in Asia lost at least half an hour of safe work per day, between 2003 and 2018, due to increased temperatures in deforested regions. Nearly 200,000 outdoor workers in the Americas and some 31,000 people in Africa lost this amount of safe work time each day. Regions that maintained forest cover generally stayed cool, and less work time was lost.
It is important to remember that, due to the scale (规模) of the study, the team didn’t measure actual worker hours on the ground across the entire tropics, says Parsons. This means the assessment of lost worker hours is based on theoretical considerations rather than direct observations of behaviour.
【小题1】Why does Parsons make a comparison at the beginning?A.To explain the causes of global warming. | B.To state the challenges of tropical regions. |
C.To show the consequence of deforestation. | D.To emphasize the high rate of deforestation. |
A.Poor. | B.Unsafe. | C.Destructive. | D.Inaccessible. |
A.It hit places in Asia the hardest. | B.It was more common in tropical areas. |
C.It affected daily lives severely. | D.It decreased safe outdoor working hours. |
A.It is just proven true in theory. | B.It ignores regional variations. |
C.It lacks systematic assessment. | D.It is based on a random sample. |
Venice is suffering the worst flooding the city has experienced in 50 years. The city is “on its knees” and Venetian Mayor Luigi Brugnaro tweeted as water submerged (淹没) much of the famous historical city.
While floods are a normal part of life in Venice, they have never happened with such frequency before. Experts say that climate change is likely to blame.
Flooding is just one of the many impacts from climate change that is being experienced with more frequency and globally threatens many vulnerable (脆弱的) areas and regions. There is a threat that is not often considered.
Changes in the ocean will have a profound impact on many of these sites.
Experts say that the solutions to saving these sites will be varied, but many will be very expensive.
A.Different ways can be used to save these sites. |
B.Climate change will impact these sites in different ways. |
C.It is the damage from climate change to the world’s heritage. |
D.But putting in place protective measures has proven difficult. |
E.Warming water threatens to kill much of the coral in the Great Barrier Reef. |
F.Many heritage sites on land are facing the great threat posed by global warming. |
G.Therefore, they suggest that countries should work together to protect heritage sites. |
Torrential rains have hit China In July, with 617.1mm of water reportedly falling form Saturday to Tuesday in Zhengzhou, for which more than 100,000 people have been evacuated. The scenes of devastation(破坏)in Zhengzhou added to a list of disasters this year that have raised the fear of climate change.
As the effects of climate change become more disastrous, well-known research institutions and government agencies are focusing new money and attention on an idea: artificially cooling the planet, in the hopes of buying humanity more time to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
That strategy, called solar geoengineering, involves reflecting more of the sun's energy back into space to abruptly reduce global temperatures. The idea has been considered as a dangerous and fancied solution, one that would encourage people to keep burning fossil fuels while on the other hand exposing the planet to unexpected threatening side effects, producing more destructive hurricanes, wildfires, floods and other disasters.
But as global warming continues, producing more destructive hurricanes, wildfires, floods and other disasters. some experts say that concerns about geoengineering should be outweighed by the imperative to better understand it, in case the consequence of climate change become so terrible that the world can't wait for better solutions.
One way to cool the earth is by injecting aerosols(气溶胶)into the upper layer of the atmosphere, where those particles(粒子)reflect sunlight away from the earth. That process works, according to MacMartin, a researcher at Cornell University.
“We know with 100% certainty that we can cool the planet,” he said. What's still unclear, he added, is what happens next. Temperature, MacMartin said, is an indicator for a lot of climate effects. “What does it do to the strength of hurricanes?” he asked, “What does it do to agriculture production? What does it do to the risk of forest fires?”
Another institution funded by the National Science Foundation will analyze simulations of aerosol injection, testing the effects on Weather extremes around the world. One goal of the research is to look for a sweet spot: the amount of artificial cooling that can reduce extreme weather events without causing broader changes in regional rainfall patterns or similar impacts.
【小题1】What is the major function of the first paragraph?A.To offer basic knowledge of the topic. | B.To summarize the main idea of the passage. |
C.To lead to the theme of the whole passage. | D.To show Zhengzhou suffered heavy losses in the rainstorm. |
A.To prevent natural disasters. | B.To win more time to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
C.To imitate volcanic eruptions. | D.To encourage more people to burn fossil fuels. |
A.More volcanoes will throw out. | B.More solar energy will go into space. |
C.More disasters will endanger the future of the world. | D.People will keep burning fossil fuels to keep warm. |
A.He thinks more research remains to be done. |
B.He is optimistic about the effect of cooling the earth. |
C.He is concerned about the reduction in agriculture production. |
D.He disapproves of the practice of solar geoengineering. |
Food made from atmospheric carbon could feed the world while helping to fight climate change, according to Solar Foods, a Finnish company founded in 2017.“We can collect CO2 anywhere,” said its CEO Pasi Vainika, whose company has developed a protein powder made using CO2. “That’s a strategic shift where raw materials are in the air. ” The protein powder, called Solein, can be turned into meat and dairy substitutes or added tofoods and shakes.
Solar Foods uses special units to pull CO2 from the atmosphere. To turn it into protein,microbes (微 物),similar to those in the production of wine and yogurt, will be fed on it to grow and reproduce. During the process, water is split into hydrogen and oxygen. Along with a growth medium containing necessary minerals, the three gases are pumped in to feed the microbes. Harvested and dried, that remaining mixture becomes Solein—a yellow powder made up of single-cell protein, with a nutrient composition similar to wheat flour.
Solar Foods claims that Solein removes most of the emissions associated with modern agriculture, which is responsible for almost one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions. “One kilogram of Solein sends out 0.2 kilogram of CO2e(二 氧化碳当量).In comparison.beef herds produce around 100 kilograms and chicken 10 kilograms,” said Vainikka. “ We can rermove the climate impact of modern food systems on the planet, which today account for about 30 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.” He further stressed that while the company’s factories also require some land used for industrial farming, only about one-tenth of the land is needed compared to photosynthesis (光合作用). “We could free up agricultural land to grow back forests,” he added, “and those remove carbon permanently from the atmosphere.”
Probably optimists are now contenting themselves with the pleasant scene of masses of trees absorbing CO2: on the planet. However, while that may sound great, Vainikka put it right, “It can happen only if we produce enough Solein from CO, to replace meat and dairy at a large scale.”And that still remains a long way to go.
【小题1】What can we say about Solein?A.It is in the air. | B.It can be changed into meat. |
C.It can take in CO2. | D.It is good for the environment. |
A.Wine and water. | B.Water and minerals. |
C.Mierobes and yogurt. | D.Wine and microbes. |
A.Its present situation. | B.Its possible benefits. |
C.Its production process. | D.Its potential drawbacks. |
A.Air Protein Produced, CO, Reduced |
B.Collecting Air, Removing CO2 |
C.Climate Changing, Danger Coming |
D.Protect Earth, Save Ourselves |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网