试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷39

On our first morning at the Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctica, the air was still. The captain made a brave choice: Our ship would hold close to the ice shelf so that the sonar system would peer beneath it while producing a detailed map of the seafloor. The scientists on board, along with the writers like me, were the first people in the history to visit this part of Thwaites. Our task was to bring back as much information as possible about the place where ocean and ice meet.

If Antarctica collapsed, it could threaten the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet, causing global sea levels to jump 10 feet or more. In terms of the fate of our coastal communities, this particular glacier is the biggest wild card, the largest known unknown. Will Miami even exist 100 years? Thwaites will decide.

Reading about the collapse of Antarctica’s glaciers, I feel I am being encouraged to jump to a conclusion: that no matter what we do now, what lies ahead is bound to be worse than what came before. This kind of thinking turns Antarctica into a passive symbol of the coming disaster. But what if we were to see Antarctica as a harbinger of change rather than doom(厄运)? This is why I came to Thwaiters. I wanted to find out: Antarctica has the power to rewrite all our maps.

This week a paper analyzed the data from that exploration. The authors suggested that sometime Thwaites retreated at two to three times the rate we see today. Put another way: At the coldest period of the planet, Thwaiters is stepping farther outside the script we imagined for it, likely challenging even our most detailed predictions of what is to come.

It took us nearly a month to arrive at the edge of Thwaiters. It is one of the most remote region on Earth. But despite the distance, what happens there is shaping us just as much as we are shaping it. If we can begin to recognize the agency of this faraway glacier, we will be one step closer to embracing the modesty that climate change demands.

【小题1】Why did the captain decide to approach the ice shelf?
A.To find out where ocean and ice meet.
B.To get scientists to do experiments on it.
C.To help the author write down the history moment.
D.To get information about the seafloor in details.
【小题2】What does the underlined phrase “the biggest wild card” in Paragraph 2 mean?
A.The biggest decisive factor.
B.The wildest thing to take control of.
C.The most difficult thing to predict.
D.The remotest place to reach.
【小题3】What’s the author’s attitude toward the predictions of Antarctica?
A.Doubtful.B.Approving.C.Tolerant.D.Indifferent.
【小题4】What does the author want to tell us in the text?
A.To escape the coastal cities in time.
B.To respect the power of Antarctica.
C.To prevent the collapse of Antarctica’s glaciers.
D.To be modest in predicting climate change.
22-23高二下·贵州贵阳·阶段练习
知识点:科普知识 说明文气候变化及影响 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Exercise has an undeniable link to the development of better bodies. A recent study conducted by University of Delaware researchers found that speech-language therapy (疗法) improves children’s vocabulary growth. The study, which was published in the journal Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, highlights one of the first studies on the impact of exercise on vocabulary learning in children.

Children ages 6 to 12 were taught new words before doing one of three things: swimming, CrossFit exercises, or coloring a sheet. In follow-up tests of vocabulary words, the children who swam were 13% more accurate.

It makes sense to the lead researcher, Maddy Pruitt, a former college swimmer who now attends CrossFit classes on a regular basis. "Motor movement aids in the encoding (编码) of new words, "she explained, adding that exercise has been shown to increase levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (脑源性神经营养素), a protein Pruitt refers to as the “Miracle-Gro for the brain”.

So, why did swimming make a difference but CrossFit didn’t? Pruitt attributes it to the amount of energy required by the brain during each exercise. Swimming is an activity that children can do without much thought or instruction. While the CrossFit exercises were new to them, it was more automatic. The children had to learn the moves, which took mental energy.

“We were very excited about this study because it is applicable to clinicians, caregivers, and educators who can put it into practice,” Pruitt said. “It’s not anything out of the ordinary. However, it has the potential to significantly improve the outcomes.”

【小题1】What does the research focus on?
A.The effect of exercise on word learning in children.
B.The impact of exercise on body development in children.
C.The children’s growth through speech-language therapy.
D.The denial link between exercises and body development.
【小题2】Which of the following can best replace the underlined word “attributes” in: paragraph 4?
A.Adds.B.Introduces.
C.Owes.D.Contributes.
【小题3】Who are suitable to try out the study according to Pruitt?
A.Politicians.B.Engineers.
C.Reporters.D.Teachers.
【小题4】What would be a suitable title for the text?
A.Researchers study speeeh-language therapy
B.Exercise helps children develop vocabulary
C.A new way significantly improves the vocabulary
D.Motor movement aids in the invention of new words

Data show that almost all children see a decline in their happiness when they make the step up to Key Stage Three, with self-reported happiness taking a significant hit. Information from more than 11,000 people showed the impact was universal and that children from all backgrounds, ethnicities and locations feel worse aged 14 than they do aged 11, with the change in school thought to be the driving reason.

Scientists asked children to rank on a scale of one to seven how satisfied they were with their schoolwork, appearance, school, family, friends and life as a whole. One was “completely happy” and seven was “completely unhappy”.

Statisticians crunched (压缩) the numbers down to a scale between -2 and 1, with the average happiness being a score of zero when a child was 11. However, by the time the child was 14, four in five teenagers had a score of below zero, indicating a widespread downturn in adolescent happiness. That decline is probably linked to the change to secondary school at age 11, according to the study’s authors.

Ioannis Katsantonis, a doctoral researcher at Cambridge’s Faculty of Education who led the study, said, “Even though this was a large, diverse group of adolescents, we saw a consistent fall in happiness.”

“One of the most striking aspects was the clear association with changes at school. It suggests we urgently need to do more to support students’ happiness at secondary schools across Britain.”

The study identified that a child’s friendships and school life were key in their level of happiness, with the move to a bigger school and the potential problems with making new friends having a damaging impact on how they felt.

However, the scientists report that children with higher self-esteem(自尊心) aged 11 lived through the storm of moving to secondary school better than those who had lower self-esteem.

This indicates that structured efforts to strengthen adolescents’ self-esteem, particularly during the first years of secondary school, could reduce the likely downturn in happiness and life satisfaction, the authors say.

【小题1】What causes the decline in children’s happiness?
A.Being classified as unhappy children.
B.Graduating from secondary school.
C.Entering secondary school at age 11.
D.Having a score of below zero.
【小题2】What should parents pay attention to when their children turn 11?
A.Their interpersonal relationship and school life.
B.Avoiding celebrating for them.
C.Their connection with their future universities.
D.Comparing them with others.
【小题3】Who will be less affected when attending secondary school?
A.Those who study differently from other students.
B.Those having confidence in their value or abilities.
C.Those moving to a bigger school in a stranger city.
D.Those who don’t care about their health condition.
【小题4】What is the most suitable title for the text?
A.The Ways to Build Students’ Self Confidence
B.More Happiness at 11 Improves Students’ Scores
C.The Reasons for Choosing a Best Secondary School
D.Secondary School Is Making Children Less Happy

Three scientists who studied how cells sense and adapt to oxygen levels have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. William G. Kaelin, Jr. of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University, Sir Peter J. Ratcliffe of Oxford University and the Francis Crick Institute, and Gregg L. Semenza of Johns Hopkins University were jointly awarded the prize.

“The meaningful discoveries by this year’s Nobel winners showed life’s most adaptive processes,” Randall Johnson, a member of the Nobel Assembly at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute said. “The three physicians found the molecular switch(分子开关)that regulates how our cells adapt when oxygen levels drop.”

“Cells and tissues are constantly experiencing changes in oxygen availability,” Johnson said. “As an embryo(胚胎) grows and develops, and as muscles work, the oxygen available changes as the tissues themselves change. Cells need a way to adjust to the amount of oxygen they have, while still doing their important jobs.”

The committee said that the discoveries are vital for physiology and could exploit new strategies to fight anemia, cancer and many other diseases.

Kaelin was born in New York and received an M. D. from Duke University. He did his specialist training in internal medicine and oncology at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, and at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

Ratcliffe was born in Lancashire, the United Kingdom, and studied medicine at Gonville and Caius College at Cambridge University and did his specialist training in nephrology at Oxford. He is the director of clinical research at the Francis Crick Institute in London and a member of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.

Semenza was born in New York. He obtained a B. A. in biology from Harvard and his M. D. from the University of Pennsylvania. He did his specialist training in pediatrics at Duke University. He is the director of the Vascular Research Program at the Johns Hopkins Institute for Cell Engineering.

【小题1】What can we know about the three scientists?
A.They studied different fields.
B.They shared one prize.
C.They researched heart disease.
D.They found the function of embryos.
【小题2】What did Johnson think of the discoveries?
A.Important.B.Meaningless.
C.Interesting.D.Disappointing.
【小题3】What does the underlined word “exploit” in paragraph 4 mean?
A.Develop.B.Handle.C.Stress.D.Follow.
【小题4】What do the last three paragraphs mainly talk about?
A.The three scientists’ achievements.
B.The influence of the discoveries.
C.The example set by the three scientists.
D.The introduction of the three scientists.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网