You watch a sad film and get caught up in your emotions. You cry your eyes out at the dramatic plot —you feel sad for the characters if they suffer, or happy for them when they are successful. It is only when the movie is over that you realize that what you were watching is not real.
But why couldn’t you accept that when you were so absorbed in the movie? It was reported in Science Daily this week that scientists at Case Western Reserve University, US, discovered that people simply cannot think emotionally and logically at the same time.
It has long been known that something different goes on in our brain when we use logic, rather than responding to something emotionally. Thinking logically is a step-by-step process, in which people make decisions through reasoning and find answers rationally. When we think emotionally or empathize (有同感) we look at things from someone else’s point of view and try to feel their pain.
Now scientists have found that thinking logically and emotionally are like the two ends of a seesaw (跷跷板)— when we’re busy empathizing, the part of the brain used for cold-hard analysis is suppressed (抑制). And it’s also true the other way round.
To come to this conclusion, scientists gathered 45 people — men and women — to take brain scans as they solved different kinds of puzzles. Some of the puzzles were tough and involved math and physics and others were social problems that required participants to put themselves in other people’s shoes.
Scientists found that when participants were doing a math problem, the region in their brain that is associated with logical thinking lit up, and when asked to make emotional decisions, the region for emotional thinking lit up. But the most interesting part is that when asked to solve problems that required both logical and emotional responses, the participants always used one of the regions at a time while the other one went dark.
“Empathetic and analytic thinking are... mutually (相互之间地) exclusive (排斥的)in the brain,” said Anthony Jack, leader of the study. “You don’t have to favor one, but cycle efficiently between them, and employ the right network at the right time.”
However, people sometimes ended up using the wrong one. This explains why some people are good at solving complex math problems but have poor social skills. And why even the smartest people get taken in by fake but touching stories.
【小题1】Why does the author mention watching movies at the beginning of the article?A.To show that we are easily moved by things that are not real. |
B.To show that sometimes we only use emotional thinking. |
C.To prove that emotional thinking is powerful. |
D.To introduce the research based on this kind of experiences. |
A.logical thinking works differently from emotional thinking |
B.logical thinking and emotional thinking take turns to function independently |
C.logical thinking is much more efficient than emotional thinking |
D.logical thinking and emotional thinking could work together |
A.people have to frequently switch between different types of thinking |
B.adopting the wrong thinking mode could have bad results |
C.people could only either have excellent logical thinking or emotional thinking |
D.people who think logically could easily be controlled |
How to get better pictures of wildlife
Go on nature observation
Animals make rewarding subjects for photography but are uncooperative models.
Become a part of the landscape
Rural animals are very likely to be frightened if approached by a person, spoiling not only the chance for a great photograph, but also the likelihood of them returning to the same spot again.
Choosing one species to focus on is a great way to push yourself. Pick a species that is accessible in your local patch, even if it is not the most attractive of creatures. Remember, you’re looking to create great images, not bad images of great animals. Getting to know that species well will improve your fieldcraft skills, and telling its story will naturally suggest different images to try.
Don’t be a fairweather photographer
Shooting in the middle of the day while the light is bright is pleasant, but rarely produces the best images. Try getting up early, when there are fewer people around and the wildlife is bolder.
A.Focus on one species |
B.Explore different creatures |
C.Getting out after dark also brings you rewards |
D.Even the wet weather shouldn’t keep you indoors |
E.To create great images, it pays to learn their habits |
F.Be careful of wild animals since they can be terribly dangerous |
G.It’s better to choose a secret location and wait for the wildlife to come to you |
They say procrastination (拖延) is the thief of time—actually deadlines are. New research from the University of Otago has found that if you want someone to help you out with something, it is best not to set a deadline at all. But if you do set a deadline, make it short.
Professor Stephen Knowles and his co-authors tested the effect of deadline length on task completion for their research published in Economic Inquiry. Participants were invited to complete an online survey concerning a charity donation. They were given either one week, one month, or no deadline to respond. Professor Knowles says although the topic of the survey was about charity, the results apply to any situation where someone asks another person for help.
The study found responses to the survey were lowest for the one-month deadline and highest when no deadline was specified. No deadline and the one-week deadline led to many early responses, while a long deadline appeared to give people permission to procrastinate, and then forget. Professor Knowles wasn’t surprised to find that specifying a shorter deadline increased the chances of receiving a response compared to a longer deadline. However, he did find it interesting that they received the most responses when no deadline was specified.
“We interpret this as evidence that specifying a longer deadline, as opposed to a short deadline or no deadline at all, removes the urgency to act,” he says. “People therefore put off undertaking the task, and since they are inattentive, postponing it results in lower response rates.”
He says it is possible that not specifying a deadline might still have led participants to assume that there is an unspoken deadline. Professor Knowles hopes his research can help reduce the amount of procrastinating people do. “Many people procrastinate. They have the best intentions of helping someone out, but just do not get around to doing it.”
【小题1】Why did Professor Knowles do the research?A.To study more about procrastination. | B.To test the effects of deadlines. |
C.To prove the existence of procrastination. | D.To advocate charity donation. |
A.A crowd-funding appeal with no deadline. | B.A one-week post-disaster donation. |
C.A one-month application for assistance. | D.A charity donation due on a given date. |
A.They are unwilling to act. | B.They dislike the deadline. |
C.They lack a sense of urgency. | D.They are too busy to remember. |
A.Its concern. | B.Its limitation. | C.Its background. | D.Its significance. |
After the destructive winter, the chances are that your lawn will be looking as messy as a lockdown hairstyle.
At the time, weeds will have undoubtedly moved into your beloved lawn.
Moss will also most likely be growing in the damp areas of your garden. So grab a lawn rake (耙子) and pull the rake hard across any moss-infected areas. It’s a job you should have done back in October really.
For your first cut of the year, make sure you raise the cutting head on your lawn mower to its highest setting. Cutting your grass too close at this stage will weaken its roots and may lead to weedy problems later the year.
A.Remove any unwanted stuff. |
B.Spring is the time to take action. |
C.Now comes the job of thickening the lawn. |
D.So your first lawn job should be to get rid of them. |
E.But there will be no harm giving your lawn a once-over in spring. |
F.Birds love moss which can help themselves to free soft furnishings. |
G.It’s always good not to completely cut your lawn every time you mow. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网