Music streaming platforms (平台) such as Spotify and Apple Music have completely changed how people listen to music nowadays. By paying very affordable prices, people can access music very easily. However, while these platforms may provide benefits for some artists, up-and-coming artists are being left behind because they only focus on big names and creating profits.
Because of COVID-19, musicians have not been able to tour or perform live in many countries, which contributes to a large part of their income. In a YouTube interview, up-and-coming Texas artist Mobey mentioned that “The majority of my income comes from playing live shows. Usually that means around 50% — 70% of what we expect to make in a year”. With these factors, small artists are finding it increasingly difficult to make it in the industry due to the lack of investment (投资) into new talent.
Small artists on Spotify and Apple Music can expect to make little to nothing. An artist on Spotify can expect to earn an average of $0.003 per stream or around $3 per 1,000 streams for one of their songs. On Apple Music, artists can expect to make a little more with an average of $0.01 per stream, or around $10 with 1,000 streams. Even if they could hit around 1,000 streams, they have to pay music distribution (分发) platforms needed for their music to be shown on the streaming platforms such as DistroKid, whose cheapest plan is $20.
A new artist would find it very difficult to promote their music outside of their social media accounts which may not even have a large amount of followers. They probably cannot get large amounts of streams on their music since it is not being promoted due to the lack of exposure (宣传) they have on social media.
With the takeover of music streaming platforms, many artists are finding it increasingly difficult to make a sustainable (可持续的) living from their love for music. A simple way these platforms can enable new artists to keep making music is to increase their payouts per stream for their music. Hopefully the music streaming industry will make similar changes to improve the situation of their artists.
【小题1】What is the problem with music streaming platforms?A.They ignore small artists. | B.They are not user-friendly. |
C.They are very difficult to manage. | D.They limit the number of small artists’ songs. |
A.His lack of investment. | B.His total income in a year. |
C.The main source of his income. | D.The reason for his fewer live shows. |
A.How a music streaming platform works. |
B.Small artists’ hope for music streaming platforms. |
C.Small artists’ dislike for music streaming platforms. |
D.Why small artists earn little on music streaming platforms. |
A.Music streaming platforms: Do they really put profits first? |
B.Music streaming platforms: Are they a chance or challenge to artists? |
C.Music streaming platforms: Have they harmed the industry for artists? |
D.Music streaming platforms: Could they offer music lovers better services? |
In the roughly 250 years since the Industrial Revolution, the world’s population, like its wealth, has exploded. Before the end of this century, however, the number of people on the planet could shrink for the first time since the Black Death. The root cause is not an increase in deaths, but a drop in births. Across much of the world the fertility rate, the average number of births per woman, is collapsing. Although the trend may be familiar, its extent and its consequences are not. Even as artificial intelligence (AI) leads to optimism in some quarters, the baby bust (婴儿荒) hangs over the future of the world economy.
Whatever some environmentalists say, a shrinking population creates problems. The world is not close to full and the economic difficulties resulting from fewer young people are many. The obvious one is that it is getting harder to support the world’s pensioners. Retired folk draw on the output of the working-aged, either through the state, which requests taxes on workers to pay public pensions, or by cashing in savings to buy goods and services or because relatives provide care unpaid. But whereas the rich world currently has around three people between 20 and 64 years old for everyone over 65, by 2050 it will have less than two. The implications are higher taxes, later retirements, lower real returns for savers and, possibly, government budget crises.
Low proportion of workers to pensioners are only one problem resulting from collapsing fertility. Younger people have more of what psychologists call “fluid intelligence”, the ability to think creatively so as to solve problems in entirely new ways. This youthful energy adds to the accumulated knowledge of older workers. It also brings change. Patents filed by the youngest inventors are much more likely to cover breakthrough innovations. Older countries and their young people are less enterprising and less comfortable taking risks. Because the old benefit less than the young when economies grow, they have proved less keen on pro-growth policies, especially housebuilding. Creative destruction is likely to be rarer in ageing societies, restricting productivity growth in ways that compound into an enormous missed opportunity.
Eventually, therefore, the world will have to make do with fewer youngsters—and perhaps with a shrinking population. With that in mind, recent advances in AI could not have come at a better time. A productive AI economy might find it easy to support a greater number of retired people. Eventually AI may be able to generate ideas by itself, reducing the need for human intelligence. Combined with robotics, AI may also make caring for the elderly less labour-intensive. Such innovations will certainly be in high demand.
If technology does allow humanity to overcome the baby bust, it will fit the historical pattern. Unexpected productivity advances meant that demographic time-bombs (人口定时炸弹) failed to explode. Fewer babies mean less human genius. But that might be a problem human genius can fix.
【小题1】What can be learned from the first paragraph?A.The collapsing fertility rate is to blame for the shrinking population. |
B.Black Death marked the shrinking number of people for the first time. |
C.Industrial Revolution weakened the increase of the world’s population. |
D.The public are familiar with the extent and the influence of the baby bust. |
A.Close relatives have refused to take care of the old without being paid. |
B.The output of the working-aged which the old can draw on is shrinking. |
C.The old have cashed in savings to cover expenses of goods and services. |
D.The government has requested taxes on younger employees to pay pensions. |
A.Because older workers boast more accumulated knowledge. |
B.Because the old benefit less than the young in creative destruction. |
C.Because collapsing fertility results in low proportion of workers to pensioners. |
D.Because restricting productivity growth compounds into a missed opportunity. |
A.The Old Pensioners Make a Comeback | B.Artificial Intelligence Leads to a Bright Future |
C.The Measures to Overcome the Baby Bust | D.The Effect of the Baby Bust on Economy |
In the UK, there is one car for every 5 people. In the USA there is one for every 2.5 people. So Americans sometimes have one car for every member of the family.
The family, with whom Liz, a student from Britain, is staying, have got four cars: a Mercedes-Benz for father, who drives it to work, a Chevrolet for mother, who uses it for shopping and visiting her friends, and Alex and his sister both have Fords. All the four cars are less than two years old, but none of them are as large as Liz has imagined.
“Smaller Cars have been made for a long time now,” Alex explained.“Partly because large cars burn up too much gas, and partly because of competition from smaller foreign cars, mostly Japanese and German.”
“I’ve noticed,” Liz said, “that your sidewalks don’t go as far as the suburbs, and yet you’re not supposed to walk along the highway.”
“That’s because nobody walks to work here,” Alex explained. “We do as little walking downtown as possible. We can’t do without our cars. We can do almost everything by using cars.”
“Did your father give you and June your cars?”
“Sure! But he won’t have money for gas or repairs or license. That’s why we both have part-time jobs three times a week. June waits table. I’m a teaboy.”
“But June’s just 17. At home we can’t get a learner’s license till we’re 17.” “We get one at 16 here. So all we have to do is to take a road test and get a driver ‘s license the moment we’re 17.”
【小题1】June’s mother________.A.is a housewife | B.is a teacher | C.is visiting her friends | D.doesn’t know Liz |
A.are new and larger than Liz has bought |
B.were made in Japan and Germany |
C.aren’t old and they aren’t allowed to go to the suburbs |
D.were bought less than two years ago and smaller than Liz has imagined |
A.because they are poor |
B.because they want to buy cars |
C.to pay for gas and repairs and license |
D.to pay for education |
A.Nearly every American citizen has two cars. |
B.A family has more cars in the USA than in the UK on average. |
C.Both in the USA and the UK, people are allowed to get the license at the same age. |
D.There will be no sidewalks at all in the near future in the USA. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网