试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用2 组卷114

Many animals depend upon sound to find food or communicate with one another. These species understandably suffer when loud motorways cut through their habitats. Scientists have long documented the ecological damage caused by noise pollution. It has always been assumed, however, that noise is a problem unique to animals. But a new study by Ali Akbar Ghotbi-Ravandi, a botanist in Tehran, has revealed that plants fell victim to it too.

Working with a team of colleagues, Dr Ghotbi-Ravandi grew two species in his lab that are commonly found in urban environments. The plants were grown from seed and allowed to mature for two months in the same space before they were divided into two groups. One group was exposed to 73 decibels of traffic noise recorded from a busy motorway in Tehran for 16 hours a day. The other group was left to grow in silence. After 15 days had passed, samples were taken from the youngest fully expanded leaves on every plant in the experiment and studied.

Analysis of their leaves revealed that the chemicals which are indicators of stress in plants were found at much higher levels in the species exposed to the traffic noise. The team also found that certain chemicals normally associated with healthy growth in plants were present at significantly reduced levels in the plants exposed to the noise. Even the weight of the freshly-cut leaves differed — leaves from plants exposed to noise consistently weighed less than those from plants grown in silence.

Dr Ghotbi-Ravandi’s findings make it clear that, though plants lack ears, the vibrations (震动) generated by the noise of traffic still bothers them enough to cause strong stress responses that are not much different to those that would be found in plants exposed to extreme conditions.

The next question is whether all noise pollution affects all species in the same way. The natural world is by no means silent. Whether some plant species have evolved to adapt to the noisy environment, which might one day be collected and transplanted in urban areas, is a mystery worth exploring.

【小题1】What does the author stress in paragraph 1?
A.The influence of noise on plants.B.Effects motorways have on animals.
C.The importance of sound for animals.D.Problems plants have surviving in nature.
【小题2】How did Dr Ghotbi-Ravandi conduct the experiment?
A.By choosing two rare plant species.B.By collecting samples from old leaves.
C.By making plants grow along motorways.D.By studying plants grown in different conditions.
【小题3】What can we know from Dr Ghotbi-Ravandi’s experiment?
A.Plants exposed to noise were less stressful.
B.Changes of chemicals in leaves were unclear.
C.Leaves of plants grown in silence weighed more.
D.Plants grew more slowly when grown in silence.
【小题4】What might researchers do in the future?
A.To improve the adapting ability of plants.B.To develop new species with high survival rate.
C.To set more restrictions on urban traffic noise.D.To find plants suitable for noisy urban areas.
22-23高二下·山东青岛·期中
知识点:说明文植物 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

The next time someone asks you to stop sharing your fun facts about rare coins, or teases you about your love for Norse mythology(北欧神话), tell them you’re working on your brain health.

According to a new study that examined memory in expert birdwatchers, having expert knowledge in a subject helps us memorize new information.

This is because, while forgetting often happens when similar memories interfere(干扰) with each other, expert knowledge provides a mental organizational structure that helps us keep new items that we want to learn distinct from each other.

“Unlike memory functions that tend to decrease with age, expert knowledge often continues to accumulate as we get older. This makes it an area of strength in older adults that we may be able to control and use to mitigate age-related memory decline and improve quality of life for this group,” says Dr. Erik Wing, a postdoctoral fellow at Baycrest’s Rotman Research Institute.

To study the effects of expert knowledge on memory, Dr. Wing and his team took in local bird experts from community organizations such as the Toronto Ornithological Club and Toronto Field Naturalists.

To identify how knowledge changes mental organization, participants were shown sets of bird images and asked to arrange them visually on the screen according to perceived similarity.

Most experts tended to group birds based on specific features, such as the structure of the beak(喙) or the shape of the tail, even for bird species that they had never seen before. In contrast, some of the experts based their grouping on more superficial(粗浅的) features like color.

Next, the researchers tested participants’ memory. The researchers found that those who grouped birds based on specific features performed better in the memory task than those who grouped birds based on color.

While we can’t all be birdwatching experts, we are all experts in something—whether it’s sports, the Lord of the Rings trilogy or our own family and social network. In other words, we may all be able to benefit from the memory boost that expert knowledge can provide, regardless of our age.

【小题1】Why does having expert knowledge enable us to memorize new information better?
A.It reminds people to share hobbies.
B.It records the influence of fun facts.
C.It helps reduce confusion between new items.
D.It prevents the change of a mental structure.
【小题2】What does the underlined word “mitigate” mean in Paragraph 4?
A.Confirm.B.Delay.C.Preserve.D.Follow.
【小题3】What did Dr. Wing and his team do in their research?
A.They conducted interviews with local bird experts.
B.They carefully grouped birds based on different features.
C.They made an experiment in the Toronto Ornithological Club.
D.They compared participants’ performances in the memory task.
【小题4】What’s the author’s attitude towards the possibility of getting memory boost?
A.Positive.B.Doubtful.C.Unclear.D.Cautious.

A pretty face is never forgotten. Do you believe so? But maybe it is untrue! Psychologists believe beautiful people are less likely to be recognized. A new study suggests that attractiveness can actually prevent the recognition of faces, unless a pretty face has particularly distinctive (与众不同的) features, such as Angelina Jolie’s.

German psychologists think the recognition of pretty faces is distorted (扭曲) by emotions. Researchers Holger Wiese, Carolin Altmann and Stefan Schweinberger at the University of Jena, Germany, discovered in a study that photos of unattractive people were more easily remembered than pretty ones when they showed them to a group of people.

For the study, which was published in science magazine Neuropsychologia, the psychologists showed photos of faces to test subjects. Half of the faces were considered to be more attractive and the other half as less attractive, but all of them were being thought of as similarly distinctive looking. The test subjects were shown the faces for just a few seconds to memorize them and were shown them again during the test so that they could decide if they recognized them or not.

The researchers were surprised by the result. “Until now we assumed that it was generally easier to memorize faces which are being considered as attractive, just because we prefer looking at beautiful faces,” Dr. Wiese said. But the study showed that such a connection cannot be easily proven. He assumes that remembering pretty faces is distorted by emotional influences, which increase the sense of recognition at a later time. The researchers’ idea is backed up by evidence from EEG-recordings (脑电图记录) they used during their experiment which show the brains’ electric activity.

The study also revealed that in the case of attractive faces, considerably more false positive results were detected. In other words, people thought they recognized a face without having seen it before. “We obviously tend to believe that we recognize a face just because we find it attractive.” Dr. Wiese said.

【小题1】Where is the text probably taken from?
A.An official document.B.A travel magazine.
C.A science report.D.A history book.
【小题2】What do we know about the photos from Paragraph 3?
A.They were all of pretty faces.
B.They were not distinctive at all.
C.They were selected at random.
D.They were showed twice to the test subjects.
【小题3】What can be inferred from the new study?
A.Beautiful people are particularly distinctive.
B.People are unwilling to recognize ugly faces.
C.Attractiveness prevents the recognition of faces.
D.Attractive faces are always easy to be recognized.
【小题4】Which word can show the author’s attitude towards the findings of the research?
A.Doubtful.B.Objective.C.Favorable.D.Disapproving.
Robots make me nervous—especially the ones which seem to think for themselves. I was embarrassed to admit this till I heard that Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, felt the same way.
Gates said in an interview with the social networking and news website Reddit: “I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence. First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent.That should be positive if we manage well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern.”
Well, maybe I don’t have to worry about my computer and kitchen equipment yet. After I use them I can always pull the plug. But in the future, machines might find a way to prevent us from switching them off. There’s a terrible thought!
Maybe the problem with computers too clever for us is not that they are evil like some we’ve seen in sci-fi movies. What could put us in danger is that they might be too efficient. That’s what philosopher Nick Bostrom from Oxford University believes. He says that machines are indifferent (漠然) to humans and in pursuit of their own goals,the destruction of people might be just additional damage. Bostrom gives us an example: A machine which might have as its only goal to produce as many paperclips as possible might look at human bodies as extra material for paperclips and go after you. Because it is, well, a machine, it would not take pity on you.
It’s a good thing that American writer Isaac Asimov thought about how far robots can go and left us his three rules of robotics. They state that a robot may not hurt a human being or allow the human being to come to harm.
I’m glad my machines at home are “dumb”. All my cleaner wants to take over is the carpet in my living room. Let’s hope they don’t create an appliance which wants to take over the world!
【小题1】The author quoted Bill Gates’ words in Paragraph 2 in order to make the text ________.
A.better-knownB.more persuasive
C.better-organizedD.more interesting
【小题2】An intelligent paperclip machine would harm us because ________.
A.it is much cleverer than us
B.it would take over the world
C.it would see us just as material
D.it has the strong feeling of destroying us
【小题3】How does the author feel about Isaac Asimov’s rules of robotics?
A.OptimisticB.SympathyC.DisappointedD.Regretful
【小题4】What does the text mainly focus on?
A.The benefits of future robots.
B.The new applications of robots.
C.The concern for super intelligence.
D.The popularity of robots in the future.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网