Teaching is widely recognized to be a stressful occupation, characterized by numerous and varied challenges: administrative burdens, long hours, classroom management difficulties, to name but a few.
But if it’s clear that teacher stress is widespread, it’s not always clear how teacher stress should be defined. Traditionally, educational policy research has focused on working conditions (i.e., school administration) as the main driver of occupational health. That is, teacher stress tends to be viewed as a result of working in a stressful environment, often characterized as lacking sufficient funding or effective leadership.
Chris Kyriacou and others have argued that teacher stress is better understood as resulting from a mismatch between the pressures and demands made on educators and their ability to cope with those demands. Workforce conditions alone are not sufficient to explain why some teachers are highly stressed. Rather, what matters most is how each teacher sees the demands they face in relation to the resources they have available to meet those demands.
A.These demands take a toll, resulting in job dissatisfaction, workplace fatigue, burnout, and reduced occupational commitment. |
B.Just as beauty is said to be in the eye of the beholder, stress depends on the teacher’s unique view of their classroom. |
C.For example, this holds true for 25% of teachers in Great Britain and Italy; 20-22% in Malaysia and Germany; and 25-26% in Australia and the U.S. |
D.However, if only 20-25% of teachers report high levels of stress, then that would suggest that the working environment itself is only part of the issue. |
E.Teachers are isolated from colleagues for much of the day, spending less than 5% of their work time collaborating with peers. |
F.Clearly, then, there must be more to the story. |