试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用2 组卷165

Travelling to watch their team play at the World Cup took a little longer than usual for two French fans. Mehdi Balamissa and Gabriel Martin decided the best way to travel from France to Qatar was on two wheels. The friends spent three months travelling 7,000 kilometers by bicycle to reach Qatar 2022 and watch their beloved France defend its title.

“It was a crazy idea, but we’re the kind of people that have big ideas and don’t want to have any regrets,” Balamissa said, as both spoke to CNN Sport a day after arriving in the country. “So, since we are both self-employed, we decided to block off three months of our time and come to Qatar.”

The pair started their mammoth (庞大的) journey at the Stade de France in Paris, home of the French national team, and finished at the stunning Lusail Stadium, the venue that would host the final at Qatar 2022. They would travel on average 115 kilometers per day, taking appropriate rest days when needed. They battled through the heat of the desert in Saudi Arabia as well as flooded woodland areas in Hungary as they made their winding way to Qatar, stopping off at campsites, lodges (乡间小舍) and hotels to sleep.

The idea came about after cycling from France to Italy to watch their country play in the UEFA Nations League last year and they wanted to test themselves with a much longer trip. They hoped their trip would promote the benefits of sustainable travel and said they planned to offer cycling workshops to children from disadvantaged backgrounds when they eventually arrived home.

The two cyclists encountered many problems along the way, including dozens of flat tires, but relied on their infectiously positive attitude to get them through. The pair laugh as they recall the time they had to travel 15 hours to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in order to find a bike repair shop before travelling 15 hours back to the exact point where they had stopped.

“We had many troubles, but we fixed them as we went,” Martin told CNN.

【小题1】Why did Balamissa and Martin go to Qatar?
A.To achieve their big ideas.B.To set them apart from the other fans.
C.To close off three months for no regrets.D.To watch their country defending its champion.
【小题2】What does Paragraph 3 mainly tell us about the two fans?
A.Their travelling plan.B.Their severe challenges.
C.The schedule about their journey。D.The scenery along their journey.
【小题3】What’s the purpose of the two fans’ cycling trip?
A.To explore the secrets and laws of nature.B.To raise people’s awareness of eco-tourism.
C.To benefit more from the cycling workshops.D.To be involved in the UEFA Nations League.
【小题4】What can we learn from Balamissa and Martin’s story?
A.Attitude is everything.B.Life lies in sports.
C.Life needs a slow pace.D.Man should be at one with nature.
2023·山西晋中·二模
知识点:新闻报道生活故事 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Nobody knows the value of a good doll better than Jandrisevits. “Dolls have a power we don’t completely understand,” she said. It’s a conclusion she came to while working as a social worker using dolls to help her young clients adapt to their changing medical situations. Many of the kids saw themselves in those dolls. But for the kids missing a limb or who had lost their hair, there were none they could relate to.

So, seven years ago, when a friend revealed that her child was stuck in self-doubt and self-distrust, Jandrisevits, now 49, knew what might help the youth through this potentially challenging period. “It’s hard to tell a kid, ‘You are perfect the way you are,’ and to build self-esteem (自尊) that way, but never offer them anything that looks like them,”she says.

Jandrisevits went about changing that. She crafted a doll by hand — using fabric, stitching, and markers — that resembled (像) her friend’s child and sent it off. After the friend posted a photo online of the happy child and doll, another woman asked Jandrisevits to make a doll that looked like her baby, who was missing a leg.

Word spread, and soon Jandrisevits was making dolls for children with scars, birthmarks, facial deformities(畸形), — in short, a doll that looked like them. She quit her job and started a nonprofit, A Doll Like Me.

Working out of her home in Milwaukee, from photos sent by parents or caregivers, it takes Jandrisevits roughly three days to craft only one doll. A GoFundMe page helps her cover costs and allows her to donate her services. She hasn’t charged for a doll since she began her nonprofit.

In all, she’s made more than 400 dolls. The waiting list is long, but Jandriscvits will never give up. As she explains on her GoFundMe page, “Every kid, regardless of gender, ethnicity, age, medical issue, or body type, should look into the sweet face of a doll and see their own.”

【小题1】What made Jandrisevits realize the value of dolls?
A.The influence of dolls on her.B.Her working experience.
C.The changing medical situations.D.Her relation to the unlucky kids.
【小题2】What does the underlined word ―that‖ refer to in paragraph 3?
A.Children’s concern about their looks.
B.The problems faced by the child of a friend.
C.The challenging period the youth are going through.
D.The fact that words alone fail to help build self-esteem.
【小题3】What can be inferred about Jandrisevits’ making dolls?
A.It targets children with mental problems.B.It is time-consuming but meaningful.
C.It is thought poorly of by people.D.It brings in a good fortune.
【小题4】Which of the following best describes Jandrisevits?
A.Creative and caring.B.Ambitious and devoted.
C.Considerate and sensitive.D.Knowledgeable and generous.

It’s reported that the American College Board has made several changes to the SAT test to help more poor students receive higher education. It offers a scoring criterion beyond its own SAT test, which measures only oral and math skills. The new tool is designed to help admissions officers find if applicants have risen above limitations in their social or economic circumstances by expressing a particular characteristic: resourcefulness(足智多谋).

The new criterion, called ECD, has been tried by 50 colleges over the past year and will be carried out by 150 institutions this fall. Relying on public data , it looks at 15 factors(因素) in neighborhoods and schools that might passively influence a candidate’s college readiness. These statistics include crime rates, education levels, joblessness, and the family members that receive food stamps. It applicants come from a highly disadvantaged background yet have proper but perhaps not high SAT scores , a college might then admit them.

Resourcefulness shows an ability to seek support outside one’s self. It requires a clear purpose in learning. The new tool “shines a light on students who have shown remarkable resourcefulness to overcome challenges and achieve more with less,” says David Coleman, the College Board’s president.

The ECD also has the advantage of not taking race into consideration in admissions, a practice being increasingly closed off by the Supreme Court and many states. At the same time, in stressing a key quality for academic success, it may help prevent discrimination in admissions.

The tool is not an absolute measure of resourcefulness. It misses other types of circumstances, such as personal or family problems. Colleges must weigh many factors in admissions. Still, it could lead to a greater focus on character in education beyond the traditional pursuit (追求) of knowledge and career skills. Graduates who have stood out despite their hardships are highly desired by today’s employers.

【小题1】Which people can benefit from the new criterion?
A.Students from poor families.B.Students doing well at maths.
C.Students having much money.D.Students with good spoken skills.
【小题2】What are the new criteria when judging a candidate?
A.The attitudes to schools.B.The remarks from colleges.
C.The difficulties a candidate will face.D.The institutions a candidate will study in.
【小题3】What is the advantage of ECD?
A.It can make applicants successful.B.It can improve the ability of races.
C.It can provide clear learning purposes.D.It can treat applicants equally.
【小题4】Which graduates do employers prefer?
A.Those with excellent qualities.
B.Those having experienced hardships.
C.Those making progress in difficult situations.
D.Those with the traditional pursuit of knowledge.

About a year and a half ago, Patrick Doherty found out he had a rare, but disastrous inherited disease—known as transthyretin amyloidosis—that had killed his father. A misshapen protein was building up in his body, destroying important tissues. Victims of this disease often die a difficult death.

So Doherty was thrilled when he found out that doctors were testing a new way to try to treat amyloidosis. The approach used a revolutionary gene-editing technique called CRISPR, which allows scientists to make very precise changes in DNA. On Saturday, researchers reported the first data indicating that the experimental treatment worked, causing levels of the destructive protein to decrease in Doherty’s body.

CRISPR has already been shown to help some patients. And doctors are trying to use it to treat cancer and to restore vision to people blinded by a rare genetic disorder. But those experiments involve taking cells out of the body, editing them in the lab, and putting them back in or injecting CRISPR directly into cells that need fixing.

The study Doherty volunteered for is the first in which doctors are simply putting the gene-editor directly into patients and letting it find its own way to the right gene in the right cells. In this case, it’s cells in the liver making the destructive protein.

“It really is exciting,” says Dr. Julian Gillmore, who is leading the study at the University College London, Royal Free Hospital. “This has the potential to completely revolutionize the outcome for these patients who have lived with this disease in their family for many generations.” The patients will have to be followed longer, and more patients will have to be treated, to make sure the treatment’s safe, and determine how much it’s helping. Gillmore stresses.

The promising results potentially open the door for using the same approach to treatment of many other, more common diseases for which taking cells out of the body or directly injecting CRISPR isn’t realistic, including heart disease and brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

【小题1】Why is Patrick Doherty mentioned in the text?
A.To prove a new treatment worked well.
B.To show how CRISPR was carried out.
C.To provide background information of CRISPR.
D.To introduce a disease requiring urgent attention.
【小题2】What is special about the study Doherty volunteered for?
A.It’s the first gene-editing experiment.
B.CRISPR was injected into the liver cells.
C.Doherty’s cells were taken out of his body.
D.Gene-editors were put directly into the patient.
【小题3】What does Dr. Julian Gillmore think of the results of the study?
A.It holds great promise.B.It’s far from satisfactory.
C.It won’t bring about any danger.D.It should be put into use immediately.
【小题4】What’s the last paragraph talking about?
A.Faults of CRISPR.B.Results of the study.
C.Prospects of the study.D.Applications of CRISPR.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网