试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷136

Some 15 years ago, in the beautiful Canadian province of Prince Edward Island, an organic (有机的) farmer separate his cows among two fields, one of which was near the beach. Overtime, Joe Dorgan noticed that his cows by the ocean were in better shape than other cows. They were producing more milk, had fewer diseases and were highly reproductive. They seemed to be all-around happier animals.

The only difference he could see between the two kinds was that the happier ones could reach the beach and were eating seaweed. So Dorgan carried seaweed across the road for his land-locked cows to see if it would make a difference. Before long, those cows were catching up with their seaside ones. He then sold his farm to start a new company, North Atlantic Organics, selling organic sea plant products to local farmers.

He knew he was on to something big. But he had no idea that what he had noticed about his cows’ new diet was about to give the world a potentially significant weapon in the fight against climate change.

One of the scientists, Rob Kinley, was researching ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (排放) in animals by changing their diet.

On average, one cow can give off the same amount of greenhouse (温室) gas as one car. About 15 percent of global greenhouse gases are made up of methane from animals when digesting (消化) the food. With Dorgan’ s seaweed mix in hand, Kinley started measuring emissions from the cows. What he discovered was an 18 percent reduction in methane emissions compared with non-seaweed-eating cows.

It was a moment of light, and a global search for an even more efficient (高效的) seaweed began. The potential for the seaweed to reduce the world’ s greenhouse gas output is great, and the hope is that cows will be feeding on Future Feed — the commercial product developed by CSIRO, Meat and Livestock Australia, and James Cook University — by the end of 2022.

【小题1】Why is the story of Joe Dorgan and his cows mentioned?
A.To raise a doubt.B.To lead to the topic.
C.To praise a farmer.D.To respond to the problem.
【小题2】What does the underlined word “methane” refer to in Paragraph 5?
A.A dangerous food harmful to the animals.
B.A dangerous food harmful to the humans.
C.A kind of chemical harmful to the food.
D.A kind of chemical harmful to the environment.
【小题3】What’ s the most important finding of Rob Kinley’ s research?
A.One cow can be as bad as one car for the environment.
B.Animals give off more greenhouse gases than expected.
C.Seaweed-eating cows are friendlier to the environment.
D.Non-seaweed-eating cows give off 18% lower greenhouse gas.
【小题4】What’ s the best title for the text?
A.A Potentially Significant Weapon in the Fight against Climate Change
B.An Unusually Smart Farmer in the Fight against Global Greenhouse Gas
C.The Specially Efficient Seaweed in the Fight for More Milk from the Cows
D.The World-changing Research in the Fight for More Commercial Future Feed
22-23高一上·江苏无锡·期末
知识点:环境保护说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

An Italian firm has invented what seems to be the perfect tool for stopping plastic waste from reaching the ocean through a river.

They had to check a lot of boxes. The device had to allow boats to pass without effort, while being able to run 24/7 with no impact on the river ecosystem. The result is River Cleaning, a 100% low-cost and low-impact solution.

Anchored (固定) to the bed at the bottom of the river, River Cleaning is made up of a series of floating devices, positioned diagonally (对角线地) on the course of the river; thus positioned, they can collect incoming plastic waste and transport it to the river bank for storage. Passing boats need only go straight through them at a low speed, after which their anchor lines will pull them back into place.

The River Cleaning system collects energy directly from the river current. It does not produce any type of waste. It is designed to have zero impact on the ecosystem. It only does good!

They can be adjusted to collect different kinds of waste, such as tiny particles (微粒), larger items like plastic bottles, and even oil, and some studies have shown River Cleaning can collect 85% of all waste passing by them.

Most people know of the scope of plastic pollution in the ocean, but it’s not as common to know that much of this waste comes from rivers — 80%, at least. Most of that 80% comes from just 100 of the world’s largest waterways. Running through big cities like Kuala Lumpur and Bangkok, the rivers funnel (使流经狭窄空间) waste into global ocean currents that lead plastic to clump together (聚集) in areas of the high seas.

River Cleaning became the first product of its kind to demonstrate that the system preserves the river environment while respecting the well-being of native species.

【小题1】What does the underlined part “check a lot of boxes” probably mean?
A.Ask for suggestions.B.Promote the products.
C.Come up with new ideas.D.Meet many requirements.
【小题2】What is paragraph 3 mainly about?
A.How River Cleaning works.
B.How River Cleaning was created.
C.Where River Cleaning is positioned.
D.What influence River Cleaning has on boats.
【小题3】What can we infer about River Cleaning?
A.It is powered by the natural flow of the river.
B.It may produce a small amount of waste.
C.It is unable to pick up tiny particles.
D.It may block the water passage.
【小题4】What do the statistics in paragraph 6 show?
A.Plastic pollution has a direct effect on port cities.
B.Inland waterways present huge challenges for cities.
C.The majority of plastic gets to the ocean through rivers.
D.Most people are unaware of plastic pollution in the ocean.

It’s a sweet moment, as a chimp reaches up to kiss his mother’s face. The touching photo was taken by the famous conservationist and activist Jane Goodall in 1993 in Gombe National Park in northwest Tanzania where she has studied chimpanzees for more than six decades.

The image is part of Vital Impacts consisting of a group of 100 photographers. The women-led non-profit was founded by award-winning photographer Ami Vitale and visual journalist Eileen Mignoni. They are selling fine arts images, most of which focus on wildlife and nature, with earnings benefiting conservation organizations including Jane Goodall Institute’s Roots and Shoots program.

“Our purpose is to use photography to create awareness and understanding; to help us see that the survival of the planet is closely connected with our own survival. As photographers, we have a huge opportunity to inform and influence change, but pressing the shutter (快门) is just the start,” Vitale said.

“For an image to have significance, it needs to reach people. To this end, we are working to get the photographs of Vital Impacts photographers and our students into high-profile media and exhibitions around the world.”

The organization gives special attention to photographers who are committed to the planet. Funds will be used to support global conservation and environmental initiatives and the group will offer two $20,000 environmental storytelling awards.

Vital Impacts has raised more than $1.5 million from the sale of fine art prints since the organization was set up in late 2021. Some of its profits were donated to the organization Direct Relief, which shipped more than 1,400 tons of medical supplies value d at $545 million to support 351 healthcare equipment in disaster zones. Other profits were able to provide fuel and vehicle assistance to support wildlife corridors (廊道), a monitoring program, and the restoration of the Snake River in the Pacific Northwest.

【小题1】How did the author begin the text?
A.By sharing an image.B.By introducing Jane Goodall’s hobby.
C.By recalling sweet memories.D.By describing chimps’ unusual behavior.
【小题2】What is the aim of Vital Impacts?
A.To help non-profits in the world.B.To call on people to donate.
C.To sell images to benefit conservation.D.To pick out excellent photographers.
【小题3】Which photographers are most likely to join Vital Impacts?
A.Those who love nature.
B.Those who are award winners.
C.Those who mainly take photos of animals.
D.Those who are devoted to the environment.
【小题4】What does the last paragraph mainly tell us about Vital Impacts?
A.Its funds.B.Its sponsor.C.Its contributions.D.Its future plan.

“We are here because of charcoal (木炭),” announced Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu Hassan at a conference in Dar es Salaam, as she unveiled ambitious new plans to boost clean energy use within the country by up to 90% over ten years.

According to new data, the total emissions(排放) from household food consumption account for the equivalent of 1.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide each year. A household’s carbon footprint related to food consumption is largely driven by its cookstoves and fuels used for cooking. Along with Tanzania, one-third of the global population relies on biomass—wood, charcoal, or animal dung(粪便) for household cooking.

Burning charcoal and these other “dirty” cooking fuels indoors generates black powder, and household air pollution that is responsible for premature deaths and illnesses. In addition, women and children may spend up to 20 hours per week in collecting firewood and four hours per day cooking over traditional stoves—opportunity costs that may come at the expense of school attendance or work and hobby interests. The costs will only increase as forest degradation forces women and children farther afield to find firewood to cook and warm their homes.

These significant health and climate impacts of household cooking help explain the motivation for countries like Tanzania to come up with aggressive plans to stop using dirty cookstoves and fuels.

There are a wide variety of technological solutions and concerted donor campaigns to facilitate the switch to cleaner cooking, but the reality is that total investments in the clean cooking sector are still far short of the estimated $ 10 billion per year.

Barriers can and should be removed through thoughtful, context-specific policies. Leaders and policymakers in Sharm EI Sheikh should follow Tanzania’s example and commit to effective policies that will develop innovative and locally appropriate technologies and fuels, and secure long -term funding to ensure universal clean cooking access by 2030.

【小题1】What does Tanzania’s President’s words mean in paragraph 1?
A.Charcoal is what we need right now.
B.Our survival lies in the use of charcoal.
C.Charcoal problem is the focus of attention.
D.It is charcoal that helps us people keep fit.
【小题2】What is not the consequence of cooking with biomass according to the text?
A.Indoor air pollution.B.Gender- based violence.
C.Kids’ absence from school.D.Forest degradation.
【小题3】What is the barrier to clean cooking?
A.Lack of donor campaigns.B.High fuel costs.
C.Inefficient government.D.Funding shortfalls.
【小题4】What can we learn about the policies in the last paragraph?
A.They should be aimed at poor countries.
B.They will lead to a reduction in fuel use.
C.They should be carefully considered.
D.They call for continuous observation.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网