试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 较难0.4 引用1 组卷234

Last fall my class and I went through an exercise to help the students understand how the world might address the climate crisis. Several things surprised the students. One was that nuclear power doesn’t help.

But many people think nuclear energy is going to be the climate solution. President Obama included federal loan guarantees for nuclear power in his energy plan, in the hopes of jump-starting construction and gain Republican support. (It did neither.) If I post something even faintly skeptical about nuclear power on Twitter, its advocates come out in force, accusing me of being a conservative, or worse.

What is it about nuclear energy that makes its advocates so determined in the face of what should be discouraging facts? After all, unlike futuristic, untried technologies, we have plenty of facts about this one, and most of them are discouraging. The first American civilian nuclear power plant broke ground in Pennsylvania in 1954, around the same time that physicist John von Neumann predicted that, within a few decades, nuclear power would be so efficient as to make energy “free—just like the unmetered air.” That didn’t happen. Today nuclear power remains the most expensive form of electricity generation in the U.S. -typically costing twice as much as a fossil-fuel-based plant.

Why then do so many people keep coming back to it? I think it’s the same reason people turn to geoengineering(气候工程) and nuclear fusion(聚变) (which has been “just around the corner” since 1943): the promise of technological progress. For the past century or more, humans have been accustomed to technological breakthroughs that made life easier, more comfortable and more entertaining. But climate change throws future advancement into doubt. It breaks the promise of progress. No matter what we do, we are going to be paying for the costs of our historical and current use of fossil fuels.

So we turn to technofideism- the faith that technology will save us. Perhaps it will. But perhaps it won’t, and our long-standing patterns of behavior will have to change along with our technology. And that’s a hard pill to swallow.

【小题1】What is paragraph two mainly about?
A.Nuclear energy has lots of advocates.
B.The supporters of nuclear energy are unwise.
C.President Obama failed to conduct his energy plan.
D.Doubtful remarks about nuclear power will attract criticism.
【小题2】What is the purpose of mentioning the first American civilian nuclear power plant ?
A.To show it was a groundbreaking project.
B.To compare nuclear power and fossil-fuel energy.
C.To prove nuclear power didn’t live up to people’s expectations.
D.To indicate we need futuristic, untried technologies rather than nuclear.
【小题3】Why do people turn to technofideism?
A.Because it can cut down the current use of fossil fuels.
B.Because we tend to trust technological breakthroughs.
C.Because people are skeptical about the promise of technology.
D.Because geoengineering and nuclear fusion have set a good example.
【小题4】Which one is the writer’s attitude to nuclear energy?
A.Optimistic.B.Hesitant.C.Aggressive.D.Negative.
22-23高三上·四川成都·期中
知识点:科学技术 环境保护说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Now, chemists have discovered new potential in abundant building blocks: Through a series of reactions, scientists have shown that conventional bricks can be transformed into energy storage devices powerful enough to turn on LED lights. “What we have demonstrated in our paper is sufficient enough for you to light up emergency lighting that's in a hallway or sensors that could be put inside the walls of a house, "said Julio M. D’ Arcy, an assistant professor of chemistry at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, and one of the study's authors. "The next step is trying to store more energy, so that you can power bigger devices--like maybe a laptop--directly from the walls of the house. ”

“Bricks have been prized by architects for their capacity to store heat, but using them to hold electricity has never been tried before, "D'Arcy said. To allow the bricks to store electricity, the researchers pumped a series of gases inside the brick. "The gases react with the brick's chemical components, coating them with a web of plastic nanofiber (纳米纤维)known as a PEDOT, which is a good conductor of electricity, "he said. Though PEDOT can store large amounts of energy, this supercapacitor (超级电容器)cannot hold onto that charge or deliver sustained energy over long periods of time like batteries can. “A battery will give you energy density that will allow you to drive 300 miles, but a supercapacitor will allow you to accelerate very quickly at a red light,” D’ Arcy said.

Still, scientists see potential in the bricks as a possible green energy solution. Right now, these "smart bricks" cannot compete with the energy storage potential of the lithium-ion (锂离子)batteries used in many solar power systems. However, there is hope that this new technology could be developed to provide a new storage method using readily available materials.

“The performance is a long way short of custom-made supercapacitors, but the principle is proven and there is significant room for improving the storage characteristics by optimizing the structure and chemistry of the bricks,” said Dan Brett, a professor of electrochemical engineering at University College London, who was not involved in the study.

【小题1】What will the scientists do about the bricks next according to M. D'Arcy?
A.Put the bricks into commercial use.
B.Refer their paper to academic journals.
C.Expand the bricks' ability of storing power.
D.Develop new smart laptop with powered bricks.
【小题2】What can we know about PEDOT?
A.It allows bricks to take up less space.
B.It can protect bricks with a powered coat.
C.It helps bricks store and conduct electricity.
D.It can make the powered vehicles travel farther.
【小题3】What does Professor Brett think of the smart bricks?
A.They need much more development.
B.They are more environmentally-friendly.
C.They will be released into the market soon.
D.They can be made according to consumers' requirements.
【小题4】Which of the following can replace the underlined word "optimizing" in the last paragraph?
A.Making the most of.B.Trying out for.
C.Breaking up with.D.Breaking away from.

Scientists from Tufts University have developed tiny groups of human cells that can move on their own-and in a lab experiment, these so-called “anthrobots” inspired sheets of human neurons to repair themselves when damaged. The researchers hope the collections of cells could one day be used to treat diseases or aid with healing in humans.

The study comes on the heels of earlier work from one of its authors, who produced tiny robots by stitching together frog embryo cells. These robots, known as “xenobots”, could assemble themselves, move across surfaces and travel through liquid.

Since they're not made from human cells, xenobots can't be used to treat humans, writes Matthew Hutson, a freelance science writer. But the anthrobots in the new study could theoretically. Each anthrobot started with a single cell from an adult human lung. It then grew into a multicellular biobot after being cultured (培养) for two weeks.

These lung cells are covered in cilia. But at this point in the research, the cilia were growing inside the clumps of cells. So, for the next week, the researchers grew the cells in a solution (溶液) that caused the cilia to face outward instead, enabling these structures to move the anthrobots, which could move in tight loops, travel in straight lines or wiggle in place. Their speed varied as well.

The researchers also tested how these robots might heal wounds. They mimicked (模拟) a wound by scratching a layer of neurons in a dish. Then, they introduced anthrobots to the site of the scratch, and within days, the neurons regrew, bridging the gap created by the wound. The findings show new structures that might have uses in biomedical settings can be developed without gene editing and without having to design the structures manually, the study authors write.

“Unlike xenobots, anthrobots don't require tools to give them shape, and we can use adult cells-even cells from elderly patients-instead of embryonic cells,” says Gizem Gumuskaya, the paper's lead author. "We can produce these robots in large amounts in parallel, which is a good start for developing a therapeutic tool.”

【小题1】How are the advantages of the anthrobot highlighted in the text?
A.By showing comments from users.B.By explaining some terms.
C.By making comparisons.D.By listing the data of questionnaires.
【小题2】What is paragraph 4 mainly about?
A.The weaknesses of the anthrobot.B.The culture of the anthrobot.
C.The structure of the anthrobot.D.The application of the anthrobot.
【小题3】What is the feature of the anthrobot?
A.It can travel both on land and in water.B.It requires no genetic modification.
C.It can be applied in a controlled way.D.It can develop from any cells of humans.
【小题4】What can the study benefit?
A.Regenerative medicine.B.New materials.
C.Environmental protection.D.Individualized education.

The days of having to carry a phone charger everywhere could soon be over. Michigan researchers have revealed a major breakthrough in harvesting energy from human motion. They say it could lead to smartphones powered for a week by the motion of a swipe(重击).

Michigan State University’s low-cost device, known as a nanogenerator, has already been tested. Scientists successfully operated an LCD touch screen, a bank of 20 LED lights and a flexible keyboard, all with a simple touching or pressing motion and without the aid of a battery. The groundbreaking findings, published in the journal Nano Energy, suggest “We’re on the path toward wearable devices powered by human motion,” said Nelson Sepulveda, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering and lead researcher of the project.

“What I foresee, relatively soon, is the capability of not having to charge your cell phone for an entire week, for example, because that energy will be produced by your movement,” said Sepulveda, whose research is funded by the National Science Foundation.

Electrical energy is created when the device is compressed by human motion. The completed device is as thin as a sheet of paper. The device used to power the LED lights was palm-sized, while the device used to power the touch screen was as small as a finger. Advantages such as being lightweight, flexible and low-cost could make it a promising and alternative method in the field of Mechanical-energy harvesting.

The device also becomes more powerful when folded. Sepulveda said, “You can start with a large device, but when you fold it once, and again, and again, it’s much smaller and has more energy. Now it may be small enough to put in a specially made heel of your shoe so it creates power each time your heel strikes the ground.”

Sepulveda and his team are also developing technology that would transmit the power generated by the heel strike to, say, a wireless headset.

【小题1】Who is Nelson Sepulveda?
A.The major researcher in the project.B.A professor of engineering.
C.The fund supplier of the research.D.A journalist writing for Nano Energy.
【小题2】The underlined word device in the 2nd paragraph is closest in meaning to ________.
A.keyboardB.smartphoneC.screenD.machine
【小题3】From the passage we know that the nanogenerator ________.
A.becomes more powerful when kept flat
B.has already come into market in the USA
C.is lightweight and flexible though expensive
D.makes it possible to produce power by walking
【小题4】The purpose of the passage is to ________.
A.persuade people to buy the deviceB.bring in a new way to save energy
C.introduce a breakthrough in scienceD.honor Nelson Sepulveda for his contributions

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网