Why do some men settle down to form families with the mothers of their children, and others don’t? Biology plays a role. Work published by Lee Gettler of the University of Notre Dame, in Indiana, clarifies how testosterone, the principal male hormone (荷尔蒙), operates.
Previous studies suggest that high levels of testosterone are bad for family life. Fathers with lower testosterone levels provide more child care while high-testosterone males are less likely to stick around. Dr. Gettler has shown something further. This is that a man’s adult testosterone level seems correlated with whether his father was present during his teenage years.
His data come from a survey begun in the Philippines in 1983. This monitored the health and nutrition of 966 men enrolled as babies. It also collected extensive information on whether the fathers of these men were around and providing parental care in the households. It further documented whether participants got married, had children and whether they participated in child care. Crucially, it also measured their testosterone levels at the ages of 21, 26 and 30.
Overall, Dr. Gettler and his colleagues found that on becoming fathers, men had lower testosterone levels if their own fathers had been involved in their care during their teenage years. It has two possible explanations. One is that it is directly genetic (基因的). The other is that teenage experience actually modulates (调节) testosterone levels. This explanation, which Dr. Gettler favors, could lead to high-testosterone men abandoning their sons, who thus become high-testosterone in their turn.
He also found some of those in the survey whose fathers were absent during their adolescence, and who ended up with high levels of the hormone, did become caring fathers. Why this pattern should exist is an unanswered question. But a zoologist looking at these data might take it as an example of developmental plasticity (可塑性), in which the same genes produce different, but appropriate, outcomes in different circumstances.
Dr. Gettler’s discovery throws a useful light on the problem of fatherless families,and how to try to end it.
【小题1】What is Gettler’s study mainly about?A.Family life. | B.Fathers’ roles. |
C.Adult testosterone. | D.Child care. |
A.It was conducted among babies. |
B.The finding is far from satisfactory. |
C.The data used were relatively reliable. |
D.It monitored the nutrition of participants. |
A.To suggest a follow-up study. |
B.To contradict Gettler’s ideas. |
C.To point out the study limitations. |
D.To give a possible explanation. |
A.Like Father, Like Son? |
B.Caring Father, Happy Son? |
C.Good Father, Good Son |
D.Love Me, Love My Son |
Is there a magic cutoff period when children become responsible for their own actions? Is there a wonderful moment when parents can become spectators in the lives of their children and shrug, “It’s their life,” and feel nothing?
When I was in my twenties, I stood in a hospital passage waiting for doctors to put a few stitches (缝线) in my son’s head. I asked, “When do you stop worry?” The nurse said, “When they get out of the accident stage.” My mother just smiled faintly and said nothing.
When I was in my thirties, I sat on a little chair in a classroom and heard how one of my children talked continually and disrupted the class. As if to read my mind, a teacher said. “Don’t worry, they all go through this stage and then you can sit back, relax and enjoy them.” My mother just smiled faintly and said nothing.
When I was in my forties, I spent a lifetime waiting for the phone to ring, the cars to come home, the front door to open. A friend said, “They’re trying to find themselves. Don’t worry, in a few years, you can stop worrying. They’ll adults.” My mother just smiled faintly and said nothing.
By the time I was 50, I was sick and tired of being weak. I was still worrying over my children, but there was a new wrinkle, there was nothing I could do about it. My mother just smiled faintly and said nothing.
I continued to suffer from their failures, and be absorbed in their disappointments. My friends said that when my kids got married, I could stop worrying and lead my own life. I wanted to believe that, but I was haunted by my mother’s warm smile and her occasional “You look pale. Are you all right? Call me the minute you get home. Are you depressed about something?” Can it be that parents are sentenced to a lifetime of worry?
One of my children telephoned me last month, saying, “Where were you? I’ve been calling for three days, and no one answered. I was worried.”
I smiled a warm smile.
【小题1】The author intends to tell us in the passage that ________.A.parents long for a period when they no longer worry about their children |
B.there is no time when parents have no worry about their children |
C.it’s parents’ duty to worry about their children |
D.parents don’t have to worry their children |
A.the hard times she experienced in her life |
B.the different stages of her children |
C.she had been worrying about her children in her life |
D.the support she received from her mother |
A.Finally the mother didn’t have to worry about her children. |
B.The mother was pleased that her child began to worry about her, too. |
C.At last the mother could live her own life without worry. |
D.The mother felt satisfied that she had succeeded in turning her children into adults. |
Have you ever splashed out (花大笔钱) on a present for someone you love, spending far more than you would on yourself?
Splashing out on close relatives may be related to evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary psychology claims that, given the level of familiarity, relatives will usually be given more.
Our emotional intelligence (or EQ) may also play a role in determining the extent to which we splash out. Those with higher EQ spent more money on gifts for others, especially people they were close to.
Yet if we splash out on friends or relatives, that may be nothing compared to what we spend on our kids. Again, this may be partly down to evolution — a desire by the old generation to help descendants(后代). Research suggests that the lower your income, the bigger part of it you spend on children, compared to more wealthy families.
A.If so, you’re not alone |
B.Besides, presents are given to cheer people up |
C.And they experienced greater happiness doing so |
D.Then a better prediction of emotions is made possible |
E.That’s because children’s needs are seen as somewhat fixed |
F.And the reason lies in our unconscious drive to spread our genes |
G.Of course, it’s not just down to evolution or EQ that we give presents |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网