试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷78

Insects are disappearing. The world has 25 per cent fewer terrestrial insects now than in 1990. This includes those we rely on to pollinate our crops and clean our rivers. If we don’t solve this problem very soon, some species will disappear.

There are many causes for the insect decline, but insecticides (杀虫剂) are a major part of the problem. Those used today are longer lasting and up to 10,000 times more toxic than some that were banned in the 1970s. Adding to the problem is that these pesticides are now applied to crops prophylactically (预防地) and used whether pests are present or not.

Overall, the amount of pesticide applied to the land is decreasing, but this is a grossly misleading statistic. A recent paper found that, between 2005 and 2015, there was a 40 per cent reduction in the amount of pesticide applied to crops measured by weight. But because modern insecticides are so much more toxic, the global toxicity of treated land to pollinating insects has more than doubled in the same period.

Governments and regulating agencies are aware of the problem, and some parts of the world have moved to ban the use of certain insecticides outdoors in an attempt to help bees survive. But the pesticides used instead are just as toxic.

One often-touted approach is to use pesticide-free pest control methods. These varied techniques are gathered under the name of integrated pest management (IPM) and have been around for decades. They offer effective crop protection and include methods such as crop rotation and the use of natural predators. But their adoption has been incredibly slow, because spraying pesticides is viewed as an easier option. As a result, IPM methods are unfortunately seldom used today

Neither changing insecticides nor shifting to IPM is a quick fix. We argue instead that we need a subtle shift in focus, away from killing pests and towards protecting crops.

By using the minimal dose we need to protect crops, we could reduce the amount of insecticide to a fraction of what is used today. Farmers would benefit from these changes. They would spend less money on pesticides and improve crop production by keeping health pollinator insects about. Reducing insecticide doses won’t solve the insect decline problem but it is a move that could win us time to make food production more sustainable and reconcile (使和谐) farmlands and the natural ecosystems we crucially depend on. And that will allow insects to recover.

【小题1】According to the passage, which of the statements is NOT true about the insect decline?
A.Currently-used pesticides are much more toxic than before.
B.Pesticides have played a key role in reducing the number of insects.
C.The amount of pesticides used is much more than before.
D.The toxicity in pesticides lasts longer than before.
【小题2】Which of the following can replace the underlined word in paragraph 5?
A.Broadly-publicized.B.Recently-created.
C.Frequently-criticized.D.Generally-proved.
【小题3】What is the best way to treat the insect decline?
A.To protect crops rather than killing out insects.
B.To raise large-scale natural predators of insects.
C.To search and develop new pesticides.
D.To shift to the IPM pesticide-controlling method.
【小题4】What is the best title for this passage?
A.Insects control — there is still a long way to go
B.Insects decline! Take measures right now
C.New findings in the field of insects control
D.Shift in pesticide use could help insects recover
22-23高三上·上海·开学考试
知识点:科普知识 环境保护说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

There is an English saying:“【小题1】” Until recently, few people took the saying seriously. Now, however, doctors have begun to look into laughter and the effects it has on the human body.  【小题2】

Tests were carried out to study the effects of laughter on the body. People watched funny films while doctors checked their hearts, blood pressure, breathing and muscles. It was found that laughter has similar effects to physical exercise.  【小题3】  If laughter exercises the body, it must be beneficial.

Other tests have shown that laughter appears to be able to reduce the effect of pain on the body. In one experiment doctors produced pain in groups of students who listened to different radio programs. The group that tolerated(忍耐) the pain for the longest time was the group which listened to a funny program.【小题4】

【小题5】 They have found that even if their patients do not really feel like laughing, making them smile is enough to produce beneficial effects similar to those caused by laughter.

A.Laughter is the best medicine.
B.The reason why laughter can reduce pain seems to be that it helps to produce a kind of chemicals in the brain which diminish both  stress and pain.
C.Although laughter helps cure the disease, doctors still can not put  this theory into clinic practice.
D.Laughter can prolong one's life.
E.As a result of these discoveries, some doctors in the United States now hold laughter clinics in which they help to improve their  patients' condition by encouraging them to laugh.
F.They have found that laughter really can improve people's health.
G.It increases blood pressure, the heart beating and breathing;it also works several groups of muscles in the face, the stomach and even the feet.

When you were at school, were you ever told to stop daydreaming and concentrate? It was easy for your mind to wander if you weren’t interested in what you were learning or if you had better things to think about. 【小题1】 But understanding how to do it, and knowing what is distracting you, can help.

Scientists have looked at what makes us delay and found a number of ways to help us stay in the zone. 【小题2】 Research by Science Focus magazine found silence is best for concentration, or a gentle background music is great! It also found turning off notifications on your phone, or switching it off altogether, removes a major distraction and helps us focus on the task at hand.

【小题3】 Psychologists and neuroscientists are increasingly interested in our ability to settle down and have looked at what we can change inside our head to make us concentrate. An article for BBC Future by Caroline Williams says that “Attention Researcher Nilli Lavie of University College London has found that making a task more visually demanding takes up more processing power and leaves the brain nothing left to process distractions.” So, keeping your mind busy might be the answer.

【小题4】 These include making a list or timetable of the tasks you have to do, finding a workspace where you’re not attracted by other things, or chewing some gum! It’s possible the movement in your mouth occupies parts of the brain that might otherwise get distracted.

But according to Science Focus magazine, distraction isn’t all bad. “If we were always so focused that we never got distracted, we’d miss potential changes, such as threats, in our environment. 【小题5】

A.Distraction is vital for survival.
B.Staying focused can avoid dangers.
C.Performing visual tasks makes us concentrate.
D.One of the most obvious things is removing noise.
E.Staying focused can still be a challenge in adult life.
F.There are more practical tips to keeping your mind focused.
G.Another possible cure for a short attention duration is brain training.

Having friends is obviously good for countless reasons. And showing the world that you have lots of friends, for example on social media, seems like a winning strategy. If that is the truth, your goal is to expand your social network. Once people see how popular you are, they'll want to join that popular circle, perhaps in the hope that some of your popularity will rub off on them.

Nevertheless, can a person even have too many friends at the same time? It’s always been a misconception that if you have more friends, people will be more likely to want to be friends you.

In fact, a new study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology shows that having too many friends may work against you. In a series of experiments. the authors prove that people usually prefer to befriend those who have fewer friends than they do, rather than those with more friends. The authors call this phenomenon the “friend-number paradox(悖论)”, which is also the title of their new paper.

Social ties are obviously important. Having more of these connections suggests greater social value, and more potential possibilities. So it seems reasonable to assume that people will focus their social energies on befriending people who have lots of friends already.

But the problem is that these social ties are only valuable if there’s reciprocity(互惠) involved. Friendship goes hand in hand with certain responsibilities and expectations. And people with lots of friends may not be able to fulfill those responsibilities—especially those with too many friends.   

In other words, “friendship quality” matters as much, if not more, than only the number of friends you have. Having lots of friends means your precious social resources become dilute (稀释了的), making you less able to be a good friend. And other people take that into account consciously(有意识地)or unconsciously when deciding whether to befriend you. They don’t want to spend their valuable social resources on someone who is unlikely to pay it back.

【小题1】What do the underlined words “rub off on” in paragraph l mean?
A.Look forward to.B.Take control of.
C.Hold on to.D.Have an effect on.
【小题2】What does the “friend-number paradox” show?
A.The secrets to becoming popular.
B.The ways of winning more friends.
C.The advantages of having many friends.
D.The problems with having many friends.
【小题3】What does the author think of people with lots of friends?
A.They may fail to perform their duties.
B.They don’t know about reciprocity.
C.They are more likely to be good friends.
D.They have more precious social resources.
【小题4】What would be the best title for the text?
A.How Do People Choose Their Friends?
B.More Friends Are Not Necessarily Better
C.Why Do People Like Having More Friends?
D.People With More Friends Are More Popular

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网