Many children’s hospitals already have storytelling programmes that aim to cheer up patients. But new research suggests that storytelling also has physiological benefits. “Until now, the positive evidence for storytelling was based on ‘common sense’ that interacting with the child may distract, entertain and reduce psychological suffering,” said Dr Jorge Moll, of D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Brazil. “But there was a lack of a solid scientific basis.”
“During storytelling, something happens that we call ‘narrative transportation’. The child, through fantasy, can experience sensations and thoughts that transport him or her to another world, a place that is different from the hospital room, and is, therefore, far from the unpleasant conditions of hospitalization,” says Guilherme Brockington.
The team, based at IDOR and the Federal University of ABC, Brazil, studied 81 children between the ages of two and seven, all of whom were in the intensive care unit (ICU) at a hospital in São Paulo. A group of 41 children each had a session with a storyteller, lasting 25 to 30 minutes. A control group of 40 children each had the same amount of time with the same professionals, but they told riddles instead. Before and after the sessions, the team took saliva samples from each child and assessed their pain level. The saliva samples allowed the researchers to measure levels of the hormone cortisol, which is related to stress, and the hormone oxytocin, which plays a role in empathy.
Both groups of children benefited from the sessions: they all had less cortisol and more oxytocin in their saliva, suggesting they were less stressed, and they reported less pain and discomfort. However, the results were twice as strong for the storytelling group as the control group. At the end of the sessions, the children also took part in a word-association exercise including words like ‘hospital’, ‘nurse’ and ‘doctor’. The team said that children from the control group said “this is the bad woman who comes to give me an injection” in response to the pictures of a doctor or a nurse, while the storytelling group said “this is the woman who comes to cure me”.
“I consider this study to be one of the most important I have participated in, due to its potential direct impact on practices in the hospital environment, aiming at the relief of human suffering. We intend to support volunteering devoted to the noble activity of storytelling, now with more solid scientific evidence,” said Moll.
【小题1】According to the passage, “narrative transportation” indicates children _______.A.feel that they are placed into the world of a story |
B.fire up their imagination and expand their horizons |
C.have more empathy with the characters in the stories |
D.experience the unpleasant conditions of hospitalization |
A.the application of the research | B.the purpose of the research |
C.the limitation of the research | D.the process of the research |
A.By making comparisons. | B.By giving definitions. |
C.By presenting examples. | D.By analyzing cause and effect. |
A.A hospital is the place where I go when I’m very sick. |
B.A hospital is the place where I get an injection in my arm. |
C.A hospital is the place where I am taken care of to feel better. |
D.A hospital is the place where I’ll have to take some medicine. |
Compared to dogs, cats are often considered to be cold to their human owners. It is usual for them to be indifferent(无动于衷的)when humans call their names. Are we sure that they don't understand human voices at all?
A recent study published in the journal of Scientific Reports suggests that we've been fooled. Japanese scientists found that cats can recognize their names if their owners regularly use them. In the study, scientists recruited (招募) 78 domestic cats. They played recordings of voices of their owners saying five words: the first four words were random nouns that resembled their names while the final word was the cat's name. Then they observed the cats' responses, if there were any.
Most of cats moved their ears or heads when they heard their names, while they made no response to other words. That suggested, "cats were paying attention to you, what you say and what you do," John Bradshaw, an expert on human-animal interactions at the University of Bristol, UK, told The Times. "And cats were just as good as dogs at learning," she added.
In the study, when people called their names, cats often associated (联系) the words with rewards, such as food or play, or with"punishments" such as having a bath or going to the vet. This made cats sensitive(敏感的)to words. After the cats had been called several times, they could respond to the words. But the scientists added that while dogs have evolved(进化)to follow their owners' orders, cats have not. Although cats appear to be distant, they do have special relationships with their owners.
According to study co-author Atsuko Saito, cats have evolved not to show their emotions as a survival method. One example is illness, which they tend to hide because “in the wild, no one can rescue them" and predators(捕食性动物)are more likely to pay attention to them, ” Saito explained.
However, technology may help bridge the communication gap between cats and us. There are now mobile apps available to explain what their meows mean. So, the next time you hear "meow, meow", your cat may be telling you, "Hi, you haven't cleaned my litter box recently."
【小题1】What did the recent study find about cats?A.Cats learn more slowly than dogs. | B.Cats are cleverer than dogs. |
C.Cats can recognize their names. | D.Cats are willing to follow orders. |
A.They connect words with punishments. |
B.They are not sensitive to the human voice. |
C.They want to protect themselves from harm. |
D.They don't pay much attention to their surroundings. |
A.were similar to | B.were different from |
C.were limited to | D.were away from |
A.It is difficult to understand cats' meows. |
B.Interaction with your cats is very important. |
C.Cats do have good relationships with their owners. |
D.We may know cats better with the help of technology. |
Neanderthals were close relatives of modern day humans. The first Neanderthal remains were found in 1856 in the Neander Valley in Germany, which is where the name comes from. Neanderthals died out about 40,000 years ago, so there’s a lot that we still don’t know about them.
Until recently, many scientists believed that Neanderthals weren’t very smart. But recent discoveries have suggested that Neandelhals developed skills far more advanced than people used to believe.
For example, Neanderthals knew how to make a kind of glue from a birch tree. The method for making this glue isn’t simple.
Now, scientists report that they’ve found a tiny piece of string(线)on a stone tool made by Neanderthals about 50,000 years ago. Before this, the oldest piece of string was made by humans about 19,000 years ago.
On the side of the tool, researchers found a bit of string about 0.55 millimeters long. Almost all things made from plants during the time of the Neanderthals have broken down and disappeared, so it’s very special to find this bit of string.
The scientists don’t know if the string was attached to the tool or if the two were pressed together over time. But that doesn’t interest them as much as the fact that Neanderthals knew how to make string.
Making string is a complicated process. Bruce Hardy, the lead scientist on the project, says that knowing how to make string was important technology for humans. “We wouldn’t really be here today, where we are in the world, without twisted fibers (捻制的纤维品),” he said. So learning that Neanderthals also knew how to make string is an important discovery.
The scientists aren’t sure what the string was used for, but they say that string like the bit that was found could be used to make bags, mats, nets, cloth, baskets, traps, or other things.
【小题1】The first paragraph of the text is used to ____A.offer background information about the topic |
B.provide some advice for the readers |
C.explain the causes of the problem |
D.express the main idea of the |
A.10,000 years ago | B.19,000 years ago |
C.40,000 years ago | D.50,000 years ago |
A.What Neanderthals used the string for. |
B.How Neanderthals learned to make string. |
C.Why the string appeared on the stone tool. |
D.That Neanderthals knew how to make string. |
A.Health | B.Science |
C.Education | D.Entertainment |
A water-proof drone (无人机) is used by Australian scientists to collect the highly-treasured nasal mucus (鼻部黏液) of migrating whales which is rich in fresh DNA viruses and bacteria. It flies over the blowholes of humpback whales as they go on their annual journey along Australia’s east coast.
Vanessa Pirotta, a biologist at Macquarie University, says that nasal mucus indicates the health of the whale “It’s the juicy biological mixture you see as a whale surfaces from the water to take a breath,” she said. “You often see that mist and hear the sharp breaths as a whale breathes because after all, they are mammals like us and have two nostrils (鼻孔). As they take a breath a lot of lung bacteria come out from their lungs, which we can collect to provide a picture of whale health.”
Australian researchers have attached a petri dish (培养皿) that is used in scientific tests to a drone which flies through the whale’s nasal mist.
Vanessa Pirotta says, “As a whale surfaces to take a breath — you can actually see it on good weather days — the drone lowers, the petri dish is then opened and the drone is flown through the thickest part of the whale snot (鼻涕), collecting the sample in the petri dish. Now once this happens the lid is shut and the drone is flown back to the research ship and we collect the sample to later process it in the laboratory.”
The research could help to solve one of the mysteries of another wonderful creature of the deep-the Southern right whale. Its numbers have recovered on Australia’s west coast since hunting was illegalized but its population on the eastern seaboard remains stubbornly low.
In the past, studies into whale health had to rely on examining whales that were either killed or grounded on a beach. Now drones allow scientists to collect samples from free-swimming whales to gather information without harming them.
【小题1】Why do the scientists collect the whales nasal mucus?A.To study their DNA. | B.To check their health. |
C.To record their habits. | D.To cure their diseases |
A.Creative and popular. | B.Cheap but dangerous. |
C.Reliable but expensive. | D.Safe and convenient. |
A.It enters the nostrils of the Whale. |
B.It flies over the whale and through the mist. |
C.It gets as close to the whale as possible. |
D.It takes samples automatically with a petri dish. |
A.They are on the edge of dying out. |
B.Their number is expected to rise sharply. |
C.They are still being hunted on the east coast. |
D.Reasons for their low population is likely to be found. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网