Stop all the clocks
Two hundred years ago, a device began to dominate the world of work. No, not the steam engine — the gadget was the clock. With the arrival of the factory, people were paid on the basis of how many hours they worked, rather than their material output.
The tyranny (专制的) of time was marked by a number of innovations. As few workers owned watches or clocks in the 19th century, people known as "knocker-uppers" would wander the streets knocking on doors and windows to wake workers at the right time.
The clock's authoritarian rule may at last be weakening.
On reflection, it is also not too shocking that home-workers feel they are more productive. After all, few people have the ability to concentrate solidly for eight hours at a stretch. There are points in the day where people are tempted to stare out of the window or go for a walk; these may be moments when they find inspiration or recharge themselves for the next task. When they do this in an office, they risk the boss's disapproval.
Of course, the new schedule carries dangers: people may lose all separation between work and home life, and succumb to stress. To inject some human contact, companies may embrace a hybrid model in which workers go into the office for part of the week. But overall office-workers' freedom from time's yoke is to be welcomed. The clock was a cruel master and many people will be happy to escape its dominion.
A.It is hardly surprising that workers prefer flexibility. |
B.But for many office workers, remote working is perfectly sensible. |
C.Flexible working existed well before the pandemic. |
D.Instead, at home, they can work when they are most motivated. |
E.Later, factories would use hooters and whistles to signal the start and end of shifts. |
F.Often, they paid a penalty (罚金) in terms of time wasted in traffic jams. |