试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷23

A simple piece of clothesline hangs between some environmentally friendly Americans and their neighbors.

On one side stand those who see clothes dryers as a waste of energy and a major polluter of the environment. As a result, they are turning to clotheslines as part of the " what-I-can-do-environmentally".

On the other side are people who are against drying clothes outside, arguing that clotheslines are unpleasant to look at. They have persuaded Homeowners Associations (HOAs) to ban(禁止) outdoor clotheslines, because clothesline drying also tends to lower home value in the neighborhood. This had led to a Right-to-Dry Movement that is calling for laws to be passed to protect people's right to use clotheslines.

So far, only three states have laws to protect clotheslines. Right-to-Dry supporters argue that they should be removed.

Matt Reck, 37, is the kind of eco-conscious person who feeds his trees with bathwater and reuses water drops from his air conditioners to water plants. His family also uses a clothesline. But on July 9, 2007, the HOA in Wake Forest, North Carolina told him that a dissatisfied neighbor had telephoned them about his clothesline. The Recks paid no attention to the warning and still dried their clothes on a line in the yard. " Many people say they are environmentally friendly but they don't take matters in their own hands," says Reck. The local HOA has decided not to take any action, unless more neighbors come to them.

North Carolina lawmakers say that banning clotheslines is not the right thing to do. But HOAs and housing businesses believe that clothesline drying reminds people of poor neighborhoods. They worry that if buyers think their future neighbors can't even afford dryers, housing prices will fall.

Environmentalists say such worries are not necessary, and in view of global warming, that idea needs to change. As they say, "The clothesline is beautiful. " Hanging clothes outside should be encouraged. We all have to do at least something to slow down the process of global warming.

【小题1】One of the reasons why supporters of clothes dryers are trying to ban clothesline drying is that________.
A.clothes dryers are cheaper
B.clothesline drying reduces home value
C.clothes dryers are energy-saving
D.clothesline drying is not allowed in all of the US states
【小题2】Which of the following best describes Matt Reck?
A.He is a warm-hearted man.B.He is a cruel man.
C.He is an inexperienced gardener.D.He is a man of social responsibility.
【小题3】Who are in support of clothesline drying?
A.Housing businesses.B.Environmentalists.
C.Homeowners Associations.D.Reek's dissatisfied neighbors.
【小题4】What is mainly discussed in the text?
A.Clothesline drying: a way to save time and money.
B.Clothesline drying: a lost art to be used.
C.Opposite opinions on clothesline drying.
D.Different varieties of clotheslines.
21-22高一上·黑龙江双鸭山·期中
知识点:社会问题与社会现象议论文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Mental health is deteriorating(恶化)among young people globally.The incidence of depression and anxiety is increasing, and this not only lowers quality of life, but can have a lasting negative impact as an adolescent reaches adulthood.

Many experts are trying to get at the root causes of this decline, in order to find ways to prevent further deterioration and to provide more effective help when needed. Two “emerging determinants of interest” are (a) over use of screen-based technology, and (b) too little time spent in nature. Most research to date has considered these factors independently, but a group of scientists from University of Adelaide recently decided to look at them jointly, to see if the combination of high screen time (ST) and low “green time” (GT), could affect mental wellbeing.

The result is published on September 4, 2020, in the scientific journal PLOS One. In it, the researchers analyzed data from 186 studies that looked at children's interactions with screen-based technology and nature and their psychological outcomes, including mental health, cognitive(认知的) functioning, and academic achievement.

What they found was that, in general, excessive screen time results in poorer psychological health, whereas green time improves mental wellbeing. Ten years ago in the U.S., the average daily screen time for 8-to-18-year-olds was 7.5 hours. As the study states, “This greatly exceeds recreational ST guidelines of 2 hours or less per day,” and is made even more challenging by the fact that so many schools are using technology to teach classes.

While some screen time can be beneficial, such as promoting connections and enabling tasks to be done more efficiently, there are many ways in which it is harmful. Excessive screen time “replaces important protective behaviors for mental health such as physical activity, getting adequate sleep, in-person social interactions, and academic activities.”

And yet, when children do go outside, they become more physically active. Their day-night rhythm is regulated, thanks to the exposure to sunlight, thus “encouraging healthy sleep-wake cycles and improved sleep, which is key for psychological well-being.”

【小题1】The research of the University of Adelaide is different because________?
A.The researchers tried to find the root causes.
B.The researchers analyzed large amounts of data.
C.The researchers tried to find a solution.
D.They combined ST and GT.
【小题2】What are the findings of their research?
A.Mental health is worsening among young people globally.
B.School technology contributes to the most screen time.
C.ST and GT have opposite impact on mental health.
D.Guidelines of screen time shouldn’t be more than two hours.
【小题3】Why does over screen time affect mental health?
A.It replaces mentally healthy behaviors.
B.There is too much unhealthy information on the screen.
C.Teens can’t break away from screen addiction.
D.Teens can’t sleep well after screen time.
【小题4】What is implied in the passage?
A.Over screen time worsens teens’ health.
B.Teens need more green time, less screen time.
C.Teens should be banned from any screen time.
D.Screen-based technology shouldn’t be allowed in schools.

Often when I mention I have a Ph.D. in physics and astronomy, the response I get from people is “Oh, you must be so smart!” In general, people tend to associate science with “braininess”. It is usually the way society sees scientists versus non-scientists.

Science writer Kat Arney explored this issue in a column for the Royal Society of Chemistry. As she points out, this seemingly unbreakable association between braininess and science influences children’s views of their future. Those who do not see themselves as being among the cleverest in class will automatically discount the idea of a career in a scientific area, even if they find science interesting and do well in the subject.

This stereotype (刻板印象) affects young girls. School-aged girls slightly outperform boys in math and science. However, men take up a bigger amount of positions at science, from undergraduate science majors to administrative positions with the power to hire and promote. In other words, the message of braininess matching scientific skills is applied more heavily to men than to women.

The problem is far worse when the message is used to generalize about groups, especially race. When combined with the cultural belief that only the “brainy” are worthy of scientific training, it becomes a self-reinforcing (自我强化的) cycle. You will hear that African-American under-representation in science is because they are not “smart” enough. In fact, black-majority schools are often underfunded. They lack teachers, supplies and other necessities for STEM preparation. To make matters worse, their students are faced with daily challenges to their intelligence for those who do earn STEM degrees.

The truth is, none of us are born scientists. We often say, “children are natural scientists.” What we really mean is that they are naturally curious and willing to experiment in ways adults are generally trained out of. They have to be taught to channel that curiosity into productive pathways. And we have to do a lot better at not reinforcing the message that scientists are smarter than non-scientist and that only the geniuses can do science.

【小题1】What is a commonly held belief of scientists according to the author?
A.Children are true scientists.
B.Men are better scientists than women.
C.Scientists are smarter than non-scientists.
D.African-Americans are least likely to be scientists.
【小题2】How does the stereotype affect young girls?
A.School girls can’t perform well in science and maths.
B.Young girls are willing to choose a career in a scientific area.
C.Young girls take up a smaller number of positions at science.
D.School girls see themselves as not being among the cleverest in class.
【小题3】Apart from the stereotype, what may prevent African-Americans from pursuing science?
A.Their low intelligence.B.The self-reinforcing cycle.
C.The majority of black students in their schools.D.A lack of school resources for STEM teaching.
【小题4】What’s the author’s attitude towards the stereotype?
A.Positive.B.Negative.C.Neutral.D.Ambiguous.

It’s becoming increasingly vital for individuals to cultivate strong critical thinking skills. Critical thinking involves analyzing information and evidence in a clear, logical, and unbiased way. It’s the ability to ask relevant questions, evaluate information, and come to well-reasoned conclusions.

One of the key benefits of critical thinking is that it can help us make better decisions. By analyzing information carefully, we can avoid making hasty or impulsive decisions that we may later regret. Instead, we can make well-informed choices that are backed by evidence and logical reasoning.

Critical thinking is also essential for academic success. College and university courses require students to read and analyze texts, synthesize information from different sources, and present evidence-based arguments. Without the ability to think critically, students may struggle to excel in their coursework and may be unable to engage in meaningful debates and discussions.

Moreover, strong critical thinking skills are necessary for success in the workplace. Many employers look for individuals who can provide well-reasoned solutions to complex problems, think creatively, and make sound judgments. Critical thinking skills enable us to consider various options and outcomes and weigh the pros and cons of each before arriving at a decision.

Finally, critical thinking is crucial for participation in civic life and democracy. Informed citizens need to be able to evaluate information from different sources and decide which sources are reliable. They need to be able to question assumptions, separate fact from opinion, and make well-reasoned decisions when voting or participating in public debate.

Critical-thinking skills are essential for success in many areas of life. They enable us to make better decisions, excel academically and professionally, and participate effectively in civic life. Therefore, it’s important for individuals to cultivate and develop these skills throughout their lives.

【小题1】Why are strong critical thinking skills essential for academic success?
A.Because academic courses require students to memorize information from different sources.
B.Because academic courses require students to engage in debates and discussions.
C.Because academic courses require students to analyze and synthesize information from different sources and present evidence-based arguments.
D.Because academic courses require students to avoid learning from different sources.
【小题2】Why are critical thinking skills necessary for success in office?
A.Because employers need individuals who supply evidence and reasoning to arrive at conclusions.
B.Because employers look for individuals who can’t provide well-reasoned solutions to complex problems.
C.Because employers want individuals who can make right and impulsive decisions.
D.Because employers try to gain individuals who provide reasoned solutions to problems, think creatively, and so forth.
【小题3】Why is critical thinking crucial for participation in civic life and democracy?
A.Because it’s dispensable for informed citizens to evaluate information from different sources.
B.Because informed citizens need become capable of question-assumptions, separate fact from opinion, etc.
C.Because civic life and democracy do require individuals to be informed in advance.
D.Because informed citizens neglect evidence and proof when participating in public debate.
【小题4】What’s the best title for this passage?
A.The Importance of Exercise for Academic Success
B.The Power of Positive Thinking for Workplace Success
C.The Significance of Critical Thinking Skills
D.The Art of Persuasion in Civic Life

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网