The AI research arm of Alibaba created a machine learning model that received a higher score on the Stanford Question Answering Dataset than humans. The database consists of more than 100,000 questions to test reading comprehension.
In early January this year the Alibaba AI software machine scored 82.44 on the test while humans scored 82.304. Besides, computers and AI have already defeated humans, for example in games such as chess. However, it seemed that language skills were superior in humans as machines find languages hard to master.
A large number of call center employees, often in developing countries, may be out of work soon if the AI robots are cheaper and as effective as human labor. Soon when you phone a company for information the conversation will go like this: “ We are sorry but all our robots are busy right now. We value your call. Please stay on the line until a robot is free to serve you. There are just 12 callers ahead of you.” A robot will serve you some popular tunes while you wait.
Si Luo, who is a chief scientist of natural language processing at Alibaba’s AI research group noted that questions such as “What causes rain?” can now be answered with a high degree of accuracy by robots. Si Luo said, “ We believe the foundational technology can be gradually applied to a lot of applications such as customer service, museum tutorials, and online responses to inquiries from patients, freeing human efforts in a new way.”
Si Luo’s team is working closely with Ali Xiaomi, a mobile customer service chatbot. Ali Xiaomi can be customized to be used on Alibaba’s platforms such as Taobao and Tmall. The new AI robots could answer consumers’ questions as they did the Stanford questions. The robots would look for the answers from prepared information. However, there are limits to what the system will be able to do. If questions do not have clear-cut answers, or the questions asked are too unclear or ungrammatical, the robot may not be able to deal with them.
【小题1】What can we learn about the Alibaba AI software machine?A.It has been tested in some areas. | B.It has become popular since January. |
C.It has offered a special learning style. | D.It has made people interested in reading. |
A.They should have better language skills. |
B.They may replace humans in some fields. |
C.They need to be customized to serve customers. |
D.They will be widely used in developing countries. |
A.Doubtful. | B.Worried. | C.Curious. | D.Confident. |
A.It needs to improve in some ways. | B.It is connected with another system. |
C.It is a platform to show good service. | D.It can answer any questions accordingly. |
A world in which extinct creatures could be brought back to life came a step closer yesterday. Australian scientists have managed to extract a gene from a preserved sample of a Tasmanian tiger and make it active. The breakthrough has left them dreaming that one day they will be able to recreate the animal, which died out more than 70 years ago. And if it can be done with the Tasmanian tiger, it may also be possible to resurrect(复活) creatures that have been extinct for far longer.
“There used to be a time when extinction meant forever, but no more,” said Professor Mike Archer. “We are now able to seriously challenge whether those animals that have gone have gone for ever. What has been achieved is a very important step in bringing back those animals that are extinct. And while I think that technically it is still pretty difficult at the moment, we can now see the possibilities. I’m personally convinced that the Tasmanian tiger will be brought back to life in my lifetime.”
The breakthrough came after nine years of experiments by scientists at the University of Melbourne, who extracted a gene from one of several tigers preserved in alcohol in a Melbourne museum. They removed the equivalent gene from a mouse embryo (胚胎), implanted the tiger gene and then watched as the mouse continued to grow normally, suggesting the tiger gene had been activated.
Team leader Dr. Andrew Pask said it was the first time DNA from an extinct species had been used to” induce (引起) a functional response in another living organism”.
However, the animal’s entire gene structure would have to be revived in the same way to even begin the possibility of bringing the Tasmanian tiger back from the dead. Mick Mooney, a wildlife officer of the Tasmanian Government, was worried that such developments could encourage people’s indifference to the protection of endangered species.
“If people think that we can bring animals back to life after they’ve gone, they will start saying that there is nothing to worry about because we can fix it up later.”
【小题1】What does the underlined word “breakthrough” in the first paragraph refer to?A.A tiger gene has been extracted successfully and activated. |
B.Scientists have recreated new animals. |
C.Scientists have resurrected endangered animal. |
D.It has turned out that some creatures would not go extinct. |
A.transplant the genes of tigers into other animals |
B.find out what factors lead to the animals’ extinction |
C.find a new way to extract animals’ DNA |
D.bring extinct animals back to life |
A.scientists now have no technological difficulty reconnecting extinct animals |
B.it’ll be a century or so before a Tasmanian tiger walks on the earth again |
C.reconnecting extinct animals is impossible |
D.humans have come closer in reconnecting extinct animals |
A.he thought it unnecessary to worry about endangered animals |
B.he is concerned that bringing extinct animals back to life may have a negative effect |
C.his opinion is in contrast with that of the Tasmanian Government |
D.he thought people should be encouraged to protect endangered animals |
When you are sick, you may dream: if only I had been given an injection against diseases before my birth. It is not a dream now.
On Nov. 26, He Jiankui from Guangdong announced the birth of healthy twin girls, Lulu and Nana, earlier in the month. They came into being via external fertilization with gene editing technology that protected them from HIV infection.
The reaction to his announcement was explosive. China’s Ministry of Science and Technology has cooperated with other departments to investigate He’s project. In a signed open letter released on Nov. 27, 140 Chinese researchers in HIV/AIDS from China and abroad condemned the research. They questioned the need for He’s project. The letter said that there are many treatments that prevent babies born to HIV-positive parents from being infected. In fact, there are many drugs for this.
Until now, there has only been gene editing research on faulty embryos(胚胎). The research only went ahead when it was clear that children would have terrible diseases. But even this research is controversial.
The idea that research could find ways to switch off genes that cause cancer may be exciting, but it is also troubling. There are worries about babies that are designed to be superior, with better looks and above average skills. People are also concerned that gene editing changes the human genome(基因组), which means that changes will be handed onto future generations and spread through the population. Such research also raises ethical(道德的)questions. If the technology becomes available, who will be able to use it? Will it be only the wealthy? And if people live much longer lives, will there be an effect on the size of the world population?
Those questions are difficult to answer. But one thing is certain: If the cures have the potential to affect not just those who are treated, but the human population as a whole, it’s important to ensure that scientific advances aren’t getting too far ahead of our understanding of how to use them.
【小题1】Why does the writer talk about “dream” in paragraph 1?A.To stress the importance of dreams. | B.To show how to achieve one’s dream. |
C.To introduce gene editing technology. | D.To prove that injections can cure disease. |
A.Critical. | B.Supportive. | C.Cautious. | D.Unclear. |
A.It is the only way HIV-positive parents bear healthy babies. |
B.It has already been applied in more than one field. |
C.It is highly appreciated because it can cure terrible diseases. |
D.It can bring benefits to humans as well as troubles. |
A.Treatments for new-born babies. | B.Worries about the future generation. |
C.Development of science and technology. | D.A hot issue about gene editing research. |
As the world struggles to deal with the climate crisis, some companies are working to remove polluting carbon dioxide from the air.
Scientists say large amounts of CO2 must be removed from the CO2 atmosphere and stored.
That means humans need to come up with ways of removing carbon from the air and storing it. This is called Direct Air Capture(DAC). The science of removing carbon from the air is challenging, and it’s still pretty new.
A company called Heirloom has just opened the first DAC plant in the United States. The company heats up the limestone to separate out the CO2, which is concrete. The process is extremely expensive.
A.Plants and trees do this naturally. |
B.That’s a huge and challenging goal. |
C.Not everyone is excited about carbon removal. |
D.Graphyte is another US company working on DAC. |
E.The new plant can remove 1,000 tons of CO2 a year. |
F.Most DAC processes require a large amount of energy. |
G.As a matter of fact, CO2 is just a small part of the gases that make up air. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网