试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷285

There's lads of research that shows that spending time in nature is good for your health and well-being. But not everyone lives near a park. And not everyone can easily get outdoors. So, what happens when you bring nature into your home via TV? A new study finds that a virtual nature experience can have some of the same effects.

The researchers wanted to see if the same positive impacts of being out in nature would translate to experiencing nature virtually, study co-author Alex Smalley, PhD student and researcher on the Virtual Nature project in the U. K, tells Treehugger. “We were particularly interested in relieving boredom because it's a negative state commonly experienced by older people in care homes,” he says.

For the study, researchers brought 96 adults into a lab and caused boredom by having them watch a four-minute video of a man discussing his work at an office supply company. In a monotone(单一的) voice, the man described a conversation with a client, eating lunch at his desk, and how they determine the prices of products. Then, the study participants experienced scenes of an underwater coral reef scene from the BBC's “Blue Planet                           11” series. They either watched it on TV, watched with a virtual reality headset using 360-degree video, or watched with a virtual reality headset using computer- generated interactive pictures.

Researchers found that all three methods minimized negative feelings like sadness and significantly lowered boredom. “I think we were most surprised that just watching nature on TV led to positive changes a Cross each of our measures, suggesting that even short, five minute bursts of watching natural history programming can have an effect on well-being.” Smalley says.

Originally; the impetus behind the study was to research benefits for people who were stuck indoors, such as those in nursing homes or people recovering from illness. But there are entirely new positive results in today's world due to COVID-19, “We never imagined a pandemic would mean the results might apply to such a wide part of the global population,” Smalley says. “We'd always recommend trying to get out into nature wherever possible but for those who can't, our findings suggest that digital experiences of nature could provide a short-term fix.”

【小题1】What does Paragraph 2 mainly focus on?
A.The analysis of the research results.B.The purpose of the research.
C.The positive effects of being out in nature.D.The negative state older people experience.
【小题2】According to the passage, what does Smalley think of the research results?
A.Some of them still remain to be further confirmed.
B.They fall short of researchers' initial expectations.
C.Some of them ate pot practical in times of COVID-19.
D.They are unexpectedly helpful to a wide range of people.
【小题3】What does the underlined word “impetus” in Paragraph 5 probably mean?
A.Profit.B.Theory.C.Motivation.D.Application.
【小题4】Which of the following is the best title for the text?
A.The Future of Virtual Nature in Nursing Homes
B.Suitable Methods of Enjoying Virtual Nature for sick People
C.Being Out in Nature Benefits Both Health and Well-being
D.Watching Nature on TV Boosts Mood and Eases Boredom
2021·浙江宁波·模拟预测
知识点:科普知识 说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Researchers say that newborn babies react differently to native and foreign vowel(元音) sounds.It suggests that language learning begins before their birth.But how much learning of speech sounds is unknown.

Scientists have known that about 10 weeks before birth,a fetus can hear sounds outside its world.But Christine Moon,a psychologist,found that unborn babies may also start to learn languages.So Christine Moon and her coworkers tested the newborn babies' responses (反应) to different vowel sounds,which are the loudest in human speech.

It might seem difficult for scientists to learn anything about newborn babies,because of their poor language ability.But for their experiment,Christine Moon and her coworkers found a good method—they used special pacifiers(安抚奶嘴)connected with computers.The researchers studied 80 healthy newborn babies.Half of those babies lived in the United States,the other half in Sweden.Each baby had a pair of soft headphones next to his or her ears.When a baby sucked (吮吸) on the pacifier,the computer would send sounds through the headphones.

Christine Moon's team recorded each baby's responses.American babies were more likely to continue sucking on their pacifiers when they heard Swedish vowel sounds than when they heard English vowel sounds.Swedish babies were more likely to continue sucking on their pacifiers when American vowels were played.The babies' responses show that they stopped to pay more attention to vowel sounds like those from their parents' language.

Christine Moon also suggests that new parents should be careful about trying to give language lessons to unborn babies.Playing extra sound might actually disturb them.They hear plenty already.

【小题1】The underlined word “fetus” probably means________.
A.a famous psychologistB.a developing baby
C.a former researcherD.an unborn baby
【小题2】Why did Christine Moon use vowel sounds in her study?
A.Because they are important parts of a language.
B.Because they are the loudest in human speech.
C.Because the pronunciation rules of all vowel sounds are the same.
D.Because vowel sounds are used more often than the other sounds.
【小题3】What conclusion can be drawn from Christine Moon's study?
A.English is more meaningful than Swedish.
B.Babies can understand outside sounds before their birth.
C.American babies are cleverer than Swedish babies.
D.Newborn babies pay more attention to their native language.
【小题4】What would be the best title for the passage?
A.Vowel sounds in human speech
B.Teaching languages before birth
C.Learning languages before birth
D.Differences between Americans and Swedish

For many years, studies have shown that birth order affects personality, but new research confirms that whether you’re an older, middle or younger child bears an impact on career path too. Led by psychologist Emma Kenny, the researchers found significant evidence to support the theory that birth order has a clear and marked effect on career paths.

In order to reach their conclusions, a team of statisticians analyzed a random sample of over 500 of the most successful individuals from 11 different career groups to identify statistically significant patterns.

One of the most clear findings was that middle children are 30 percent more likely to become company CEOs than their siblings. The researchers suggested that this could be because having to fight for attention results in middle children developing personality features such as competitiveness, flexibility and diplomacy, which then makes them suited to high-flying roles which require thoughtfulness and high levels of management. Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates are all middle children. In encouraging news for middle children across the world, the study also found that they’re 41 percent more likely to be Olympic athletes.

Interestingly, the researchers found that the majority of astronauts are first-born children-Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong are prime examples. Eldest children are also most likely to become scientists or engineers like Stephen Hawking and Tim Berners Lee.

Youngest children like Johann Sebastian Bach and Mozart were found to be 50 percent more likely to have careers in classical music, possibly for their “sensitive and idealistic personality traits”, the researchers suggest.

As for only children, the study suggests they’re more likely to become artists due to their “Perfectionist and mature personality traits.”

Category

Sibling Type

Percentage of occurrence in the sample

Exceeds the ratio expected from Av Families by

Politicians

Middle

28%

16%

Rock Stars

Eldest

48%

25%

Olympians

Middle

34%

41%

CEOs

Middle

31%

30%

Composers

Younger

52%

50%

Astronauts

Eldest

50%

29%

Explorers

Youngest

43%

12%

Scientists and Engineers

Elder

37%

7%

Authors

Middle

40%

66%

Artists

Only

18%

181%

Reality TV Stars

Elder

46%

32%

The average UK family has 2.44 children, but the researchers found that family size does play a part - scientists were found to come from much larger families than average.

【小题1】Which of the following is Emma Kenny’s latest finding?
A.Birth order may be connected to one’s career path.
B.The number of sibling decides the personality of each child.
C.Middle children are likely to have the brightest future.
D.Family size affects the development of each child.
【小题2】Why are middle children more likely to become company CEOs?
A.They are more likely to become perfectionists.
B.They are more loved and protected than their siblings.
C.They are more willing to make new friends.
D.They are more used to a competitive environment.
【小题3】According to the study, what seems to be the most promising profession for only children?
A.Scientists.B.Artists
C.Explorers.D.Athletes.

Insect numbers have quickly declined by half in some parts of the world due to climate change and intensive agriculture, a study has found. The combined influences of global heating and farming are driving a “substantial decline” of insects across the globe, according to UK researchers.

Lead researcher, Dr Charlie Outhwaite of University College of London, said losing insect populations could be harmful not only to the natural environment, but to human health and food security, particularly with losses of pollinators (传粉者). “Our findings highlight the urgency of actions to preserve natural habitats, slow the expansion of high-intensity agriculture, and cut emissions to reduce climate change,” she added.

The rapid decrease of populations of insects around the world has caused widespread concern. However, scientific data gives a mixed picture, with some types of insects showing extreme and sudden declines, while others are staying steady.

In the latest study published in Nature, the researchers pulled together data on the range and number of nearly 20,000 insect species, including bees, ants, butterflies and dragonflies, at about 6,000 different areas. In areas with high-intensity agriculture and on-going warming, insect numbers have quickly declined by 49%, compared with relatively untouched places that have so far avoided the most severe impacts of climate change.

“Careful management of agricultural areas, such as preserving natural habitats near farmland, may help to ensure that vital insects can still thrive (茁壮成长),” said Dr Tim Newbold, another study researcher. “We need to acknowledge how important insects are for the environment as a whole, and for human health and well-being, in order to address the threats we pose to them before many species are lost forever.

【小题1】Which of the following can cause the fall in insect numbers according to the text?
A.Global warming.B.Lack of food.
C.The change of seasons.D.Habitat management.
【小题2】What may Dr Charlie Outhwaite suggest?
A.Taking action to ensure food security.B.Protecting natural habitats of insects.
C.Stopping developing agriculture.D.Keeping insects at home.
【小题3】How did the researchers draw the conclusion in the latest study?
A.By carrying out surveys.B.By doing experiments.
C.By discussing questions.D.By analyzing data.
【小题4】What does the text mainly talk about?
A.The loss of farmland.B.The future of agriculture.
C.The decline of insect numbers.D.The harm of climate change.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网