试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷104

Barred owls(大林鸮猫头鹰) are a large species native to eastern North America, but they began moving west at the start of the 20th century. By 1973, large numbers of barred owls had arrived in the western state of Washington. Later they moved south into Oregon and California.

In parts of the Pacific Northwest, the owls are now believed to be causing a drop in the population of a smaller, less aggressive bird: the northern spotted owl. In many ways, the barred owl is the spotted owl's worst enemy. The barred owl has more babies per year and eats the same animals, like squirrels and wood rats. And their numbers are now larger in many parts of the spotted owl's traditional territory.

David Wiens is a biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, a federal agency that studies the Earth and its natural resources. He and other officials are doing something unusual to protect spotted owls: killing barred owls. It is a controversial, experimental program. More than 2,400 barred owls have already been shot.

Wiens is the son of a well-known bird expert and grew up with the fascination for birds. He has mixed feelings about the program. "It's a little distasteful, I think, to go out killing barred owls to save another owl species," he says. But he adds, “We knew that barred owls were out competing spotted owls and their numbers were growing too fast."

To catch barred owls, officials put digital bird callers on the ground. Then they step back and wait as several sounds from the devices fill the air. All of this happens in the dark of night. Barred owls dislike other birds in their territory, so they will fly down and chase other owls out. That is when Wiens and his team try to shoot them.

【小题1】What's the main problem with spotted owls?
A.They are being starved to death.B.They have more babies each year.
C.They are invaded by another bird.D.They are hunted by man.
【小题2】Why are barred owls being killed?
A.They are eating the spotted owls.B.They are killing each other to survive.
C.They are putting the spotted owls in danger.D.They are destroying large areas of forests.
【小题3】Why did the officials release the bird sounds?
A.To kill barred owls.B.To puzzle barred owls.
C.To protect barred owls.D.To frighten barred owls.
【小题4】What can be the best title for the text?
A.Killing One Animal to Save Another.B.Keeping the Balance of Nature.
C.Protecting Birds in Danger.D.Preventing Birds from Playing Fair.
20-21高一下·湖北孝感·期末
知识点:动物人与动植物说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Sharks and their relatives are some of the most threatened vertebrates (脊椎动物) on Earth. Coral reefs (珊瑚礁) provide homes for countless fish species that are vital for fisheries and are therefore an especially important ecosystem for humans — and one where the decline of shark populations seems to be especially sharp.

The study by Simpfendorfer with his team is the result of an act of worldwide cooperation called the Global FinPrint Project. The data analyzed include more than 20,000 hours of standardized underwater video taken at nearly 400 reefs in 67 countries around the world. It reveals declines of 60 to 73% of once-abundant coral reef shark species at reefs around the world. The global conservation status of sharks and rays (鳐鱼) is worse than a decade ago and is even more concerning for some groups of sharks.

However, the findings of Simpfendorfer with his team include signs of hope and a clear path forward. Their result s show that although shark populations in many reefs had declined, some health y reef shark populations remained. The reefs with healthier shark population s had some important similarities: they tended to be in the waters of high-income countries with stronger natural resource management laws and rules. Unfortunately, such countries were relatively rare, and lower-income countries tended to have fewer resources for eco-friendly management.

The most unexpected result of the study is that a decline or complete loss of shark species in one reef was not always associated with similar changes in nearby reefs. They found that one reef could be overfished so badly that a once-common reef shark species was totally gone, but another reef a short distance away could have healthy populations of that same species.

The problem is clear -animals that provide ecosystem services that are vital for human food security and livelihoods are disappearing at an alarming rate. The loss of sharks and the ecosystem services they provide represents an ecological disaster that can cause substantial harm to humans.

【小题1】What can we learn about the study from the second paragraph?
A.It was directed by the Global FinPrint Project.
B.It was to find out the reasons for ocean pollution.
C.It analyzed data about shark species in coral reefs.
D.Certain sharks were found endangered in the study.
【小题2】Why could healthy reef shark populations remain in some areas?
A.Citizens there had a strong environmental awareness.
B.Science and economics were improving fast in such areas.
C.The waters in these areas were suitable for sharks to live in.
D.They were well-developed areas with strict environmental laws.
【小题3】What can be inferred from the last two paragraphs?
A.Humans and animals coexist in ecosystem.
B.Overfishing is a contributing factor to the decline of sharks.
C.It’s uncertain whether humans cause the decrease of sharks.
D.Distances between reefs affect the number of shark species.
【小题4】What’s the text mainly about?
A.A sharp decline of reef sharks.B.Possible recovery of reef sharks.
C.Global cooperation of ocean protection.D.Amazing discovery of coral reefs.

Even plant can run a fever, especially when they're under attack by insects or disease. But unlike human, plants can have their temperature taken from 3,000 feet away straight up. A decade ago, adopting the infrared(红外线) scanning technology developed for military purposes and other satellites, physicist Stephen Paley came up with a quick way to take the temperature of crops to determine which ones are under stress. The goal was to let farmers precisely(精确的) target pesticide(杀虫剂) spraying rather than rain poison on a whole field, which always includes plants that don't have pest problems.

Even better, Paley's Remote Scanning Services Company could detect crop problems before they became visible to the eye. Fixed on a plane flown at 3,000 feet at night, an infrared scanner measured the heat sent out by crops. The data were transformed into a color﹣coded map showing where plants were running "fevers". Farmers could then spot﹣spray, using 50 to 70 percent less pesticide that they otherwise would.

The bad news is that Paley's company closed down in 1984, after only three years. Farmers resisted the new technology and long﹣term supporters were hard to find. But with the renewed concern about pesticides on produce and refinements(改进) in infrared scanning, Paley hopes to get back into operation. Agriculture experts have no doubt that the technology works. "This technique can be used on 75 percent of agricultural land in the United States," says George Oerther of Texas A& M, who recently retired from the Department of Agriculture, thinks remote infrared crop scanning could be adopted by the end of the decade. But only if Paley finds the financial support which he failed to obtain 10years ago.

【小题1】Plants will give out an increased amount of heat when they are   
A.facing an infrared scanner
B.sprayed with pesticides
C.exposed to extreme sun rays
D.in poor physical condition
【小题2】In order to apply pesticide spraying precisely, we can use infrared scanning to   
A.draw a color﹣coded map
B.evaluate the damage to the crops
C.locate the problem area
D.measure the size of the affected area
【小题3】The application of infrared scanning technology to agriculture met with some difficulties of   
A.the lack of official support
B.its high cost
C.the lack of financial support
D.its failure to help increase production
【小题4】Infrared scanning technology may be brought back into operation because of   
A.full support from agricultural experts
B.the forceful promotion by the Department of Agriculture
C.the desire of farmers to improve the quality of their produce
D.growing concern about the over use of pesticides on crops

Wildlife corridors are like safe highways for animals. These untouched areas let species move about freely to feed, breed, and migrate (迁徙) without disturbance from humans. The Vital Ground Foundation and Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative (Y2Y) bought 80 acres in northwestern Montana. The area was bought from a landowner committed to protecting open spaces over development. The area will be used to maintain wildlife habitats for species throughout the state’s northwestern corner and is particularly important for grizzly bears.

“In 2015, new science on grizzly bear connectivity identified this area as one of a few remaining connection points for grizzly bears in northwest Montana,” says Grossman, U.S. program manager for Y2Y. “Last year, the opportunity became available to work with the landowner in the area. With the rapid development of the real estate (房地产) market, we knew we needed to act quickly.”

“At the local area, this project conserves open spaces for wildlife movement,” Grossman says. She points out that grizzly bears are an umbrella species. This means that if they are doing well, most other wildlife in the ecosystem is also doing well. Bears can help us conserve habitats for a full range of plants and animals that make a functioning ecosystem that all of us need to survive. That is why this project focuses on the needs of bears.

It often becomes more difficult to preserve wildlife corridors like these. In Montana where this land has been purchased, property values have increased and land has been sold and developed quickly. Once development happens, it’s harder to conserve land and keep areas connected. “However, this change in the real estate market has led to some landowners reflecting on their values and vision for the community. In this way, it creates an opportunity for us to be able to work with people who want to see these areas remain high quality wildlife habitats, rural and undeveloped,” Grossman says.

【小题1】Why did the authorities buy the land in northwestern Montana?
A.To help develop the local economy.
B.To better preserve wildlife habitats.
C.To construct highways in rural areas.
D.To prevent endangered species migrating.
【小题2】What does the author intend to do in Paragraph 2?
A.To explain a natural phenomenon.
B.To provide some advice for readers.
C.To add some background information.
D.To introduce a new topic for discussion.
【小题3】Why does this project concentrate on protecting grizzly bears?
A.Their population has declined sharply.
B.They play a critical role in the ecosystem.
C.They affect living habits of other wildlife.
D.Human activities harm them seriously.
【小题4】What affects wildlife corridors according to Paragraph 4?
A.Land development.B.Community structure.
C.Damaged ecosystem.D.Geographic locations.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网