试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用2 组卷158

When antibiotics(抗生素)first became available, farmers used them freely. Now scientists know that the overuse of antibiotics can cultivate drug-resistant bacteria that are dangerous to human health. Among debates over what kinds of restrictions should be put in place, figuring out how antibiotic-resistant bacteria evolve and make their way to humans remains an area of intense interest.

Jo Handelsman is tracing one such pathway that, as she puts it, travels from "farm to table."Handelsman, a microbiologist who is now associate director for science at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, looked into dairy cows, which are often treated with antibiotics and produce manure(排泄物)that farmers use on their crops. In addition to nutrients, that fertilizer may harbor antibiotic-resistant bacteria—a problem because the bacteria can come into contact with plants that are finally shipped to supermarkets and sometimes eaten raw.

To find out how those antibiotic-resistant bacteria come to exist, Handelsman and her colleagues at Yale University added manure from a nearby Connecticut farm to raised beds of soil in 2013. In this case, the manure specifically came from cows that were not treated with antibiotics. The researchers unexpectedly found that there were more soil bacteria carrying antibiotic-resistant genes when they were grown with the manure than when they were grown with synthetic nitrogen-based fertilizer—even though the cows were drug-free.

Previous research has found that manure from pigs treated with antibiotics contains resistant bacteria, but the cow-pie results suggest there are more factors promoting resistance besides antibiotic use. Something about manure itself may encourage naturally resistant bacteria to increase.

The findings should not, however, give the impression that resistance is everywhere, notes Lance Price, a microbiologist at George Washington University(who was not involved in the study). "We can control this. There's very clear evidence that when we turn off the antibiotic tap, we bring down drug-resistant bacteria," says Lance.

Next on the farm-to-table schedule, Handelsman will test whether radishes grown in soil treated with cow manure are capable of taking up resistant genes from bacteria through their vascular system(循环系统). "They have veins(血管)just like us," she says. "We don't have any evidence yet that they're taking up the bacteria, but it's a really interesting possibility."

【小题1】What does Jo Handelsman's research focus on?
A.How antibiotics makes its way onto our table.
B.What restrictions should be put to antibiotics use.
C.How antibiotics-resistant bacteria reach human beings.
D.What damage the overuse of antibiotics does to humans.
【小题2】What did Jo's research find?
A.Drug-free cows produced manure with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
B.Synthetic nitrogen-based fertilizer did more good to the environment.
C.Soil bacteria carrying antibiotic-resistant genes were increasing with time.
D.Manure from pigs treated with antibiotics contained fewer resistant bacteria.
【小题3】Lance Price is quoted in the passage in order to ________.
A.provide more evidence that drug-resistance bacteria are dangerous
B.suggest another possible explanation to the antibiotics problems
C.emphasize the importance of feeding cows with no antibiotics
D.show that the research findings may not be that worrisome
【小题4】Which of the following statements is Jo most likely to agree with?
A.It is very likely that widespread resistance to antibiotics is not inevitable.
B.Plants grown in soil fertilized with cow manure may contain drug-resistant genes.
C.There is possibility that radishes take up resistant genes wherever they are planted.
D.The vascular system plays a key role in guarding radishes against bacteria.
2021·上海·三模
知识点:科普知识 说明文 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Video conferencing has been around for more than 20 years. Until the COVID-19 pandemic, though, you would find that many people needing to attend a meeting remotely would be calling from a real conference room full of their teammates. Today, we’re routinely holding video conferences that are 100% virtual. And this is creating a problem that technology can’t fix.

The problem is us, specifically the fact that we haven’t evolved socially to the point where we can bear much separation. So much of our well-being and work productivity is decided on how close we are physically. The removal of that for any period of time can be severely damaging. One surprising victim of social distancing is laughter.

Normally people laugh about 18 times per day. And 97% of that time we’re laughing with others — we are 30 times more likely to laugh with others than to laugh alone. Think about it: how often when you and your friends laugh at something that is actually funny? Research shows that 80% of what people laugh at is really not that funny.

So why do people laugh? They laugh in order to laugh with others. Just as everyone starts yawning when just one person yawns, most people can’t help but laugh when those around them do. This is why TV comedy shows often use prerecorded laugh tracks.

Laughing in response to other people’s laughing is not just a behavioral phenomenon. When we laugh, our body produces two key chemicals: endorphin which helps relieve pain and sets off feelings of pleasure, and dopamine which can improve learning, motivation and attention. In fact, studies show that people can stand 15% more pain simply by laughing for a few minutes beforehand. Laughter is also associated with higher motivation and productivity at work.

In today’s home-alone, virtual-team world, this is exactly what you as a team leader should be doing: for your team members to stay healthy and productive, you need to get them to laugh more and stress less.

【小题1】What is the problem mentioned in the first two paragraphs?
A.A distant relationship. B.Unexpected social evolution.
C.Decreased laughter. D.Removed social distance.
【小题2】What can be inferred from the article?
A.Laughing alone is normal. B.Laughing is for fun.
C.Laughing starts with yawning. D.Laughing comes more in groups.
【小题3】What is Paragraph 5 mainly about?
A.The motivation behind laughter. B.The chemicals regarding laughter.
C.The mechanism of laughter. D.The significance of laughter.
【小题4】What would the author most probably discuss next?
A.How to boost laughter. B.How to better a team.
C.How to reduce stress. D.How to increase productivity.

The Earth’s ozone (臭氧) layer is on its way to recovering, thanks to decades of work to get rid of ozone-damaging chemicals, a panel of international experts backed by the United Nations has found.

The ozone layer serves an important function for living things on Earth. This shield in the stratosphere (平流层) protects humans and the environment from harmful levels of the sun’s radiation.

The international community was alarmed after experts discovered a hole in the ozone layer in May 1985. Scientists had previously discovered that chemicals, used in manufacturing certain sprays and used as refrigerants (制冷剂), could destroy ozone. Two years after the discovery of the dreadful state of the ozone layer, international bodies adopted a global agreement called the Montreal Protocol. This established the phaseout (逐步淘汰) of almost 100 man-made chemicals that were tied to the destruction of the all-important ozone.

In the latest report on the progress of the Montreal Protocol, the UN-backed panel confirmed that nearly 99% of banned ozone-eating substances have been phased out. If current policies stay in place, the ozone layer is expected to recover to 1980 values by 2040, the United Nations announced. In some places, it may take longer. Experts said that 1980-level recovery over Antarctica is expected by around 2066 and by 2045 over the Arctic.

The destruction of the ozone layer is not a major cause of climate change. But research is showing that these efforts to save the ozone layer are proving beneficial in the fight against climate change. “Ozone action is a pioneer for climate action,” said World Meteorological Organization Secretary-General Petteri Taalas. “Our success in phasing out ozone-eating chemicals shows us that what can and must be done-as a matter of urgency-to shift away from fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gases and so limit temperature increase.”

【小题1】Why did the international community start to protect the ozone layer?
A.Because the Montreal Protocol was signed.
B.Because chemicals could destroy the ozone layer.
C.Because a hole in the ozone layer was discovered.
D.Because the stratosphere is harmful to human health.
【小题2】Which of the following can NOT help protect the ozone layer?
A.Using less hair-setting spray.
B.Increasing refrigerant production.
C.Minimizing the use of cold air-conditioner.
D.Phasing out ozone-consuming substances.
【小题3】What’s the main idea of Paragraph 4?
A.The Montreal Protocol is taking effect.
B.The ozone layer will fully recover by 2040.
C.The Montreal Protocol needs to be improved.
D.The ozone layer protection has a long way to go.
【小题4】What can be inferred from Petteri Taalas’ words?
A.Climate protection has led to the ozone protection.
B.The destruction of ozone layer didn’t cause climate change.
C.It’s an urgency to reduce the use of ozone-eating chemicals.
D.Ozone protection guides our future efforts in climate action.

Charles Darwin, famous for his theory of evolution(进化)by natural selection, was a well-known biologist.

The Cambridge University Library in the UK contains a huge collection of Darwin’s documents that includes a pair of small notebooks known as the Tree of Life notebooks. They went missing over two decades ago, but a nameless person returned them to the library recently—wrapped in plastic and placed inside a pink gift bag. The notebooks reappeared with a simple printed message—“Librarian. Happy Easter. X.”

The notebooks got their nickname from Darwin’s 1837 hand-drawn sketch(草图)of his Tree of Life concept, which shows a branching tree as a metaphor for his ideas around evolution. The sketch is both simple and significant. ”They may be tiny, just the size of postcards, but the notebooks’ impact on the history of science, and their importance to our world-class collections here, cannot be ignored,“ says librarian Jessica Gardner.

The notebooks suffered a lot after they were removed from a secure room in 2000 so they could be photographed. The photography project was completed, but a routine check in early 2001 found the notebooks weren’t where they were supposed to be.

At first, the librarians thought the notebooks had simply been misplaced, but a series of searches over the years turned up nothing. A new search in 2020 included a deep dive into the boxes in the Darwin collection. ”However, this failed to locate the notebooks, leading to the conclusion that they had likely been stolen," the library says. In 2020, the library issued a public appeal for the return of the notebooks, which seems to have paid off.

To celebrate the notebooks’ return, the library displayed them in July in a free exhibition called Darwin in Conversation. We may never know where the notebooks spent their time away, but they should be back for good.

【小题1】How were the notebooks named according to the text?
A.They were named after the library.
B.They were named after Charles Darwin.
C.They were named according to their content.
D.They were named according to the time they were written,
【小题2】What does Jessica Gardner think of the notebooks?
A.They will promote the development of science greatly.
B.They are an important part of the library’s collection.
C.They are the feature of Darwin’s theory.
D.They have great economic value.
【小题3】When did the library find the notebooks disappeared?
A.In 2000,B.In 2001.
C.In 2020.D.In 2022.
【小题4】Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.The Collections of the Cambridge University Library
B.Great Biologist. Charles Darwin
C.Secret in Darwin’s Notebooks
D.The Lost Notebooks Returned

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网