Rising Seas Will Erase More Cities by 2050, New Research Shows
Rising seas could affect three times more people by 2050 than previously thought, according to new research, threatening to all but erase some of the world's great coastal cities.
The authors of a paper published on Tuesday developed a more accurate way of calculating land elevation based on satellite readings, and found that the previous numbers were far too optimistic. The new research shows that some 150 million people are now living on the land that will be below the high-tide line by mid-century. In Thailand, more than 10 percent of citizens now live on the land that is likely to be covered with water by 2050, compared with just 1 percent according to the earlier technique. The political and commercial capital, Bangkok, is particularly dangerous.
In other places, the migration caused by rising seas could cause or worsen regional conflicts. Basra, the second largest city in Iraq, could be mostly underwater by 2050. If that happens, the effects could be felt well beyond Iraq's borders, according to John Castellaw, a retired Marine Corps general.
“Further loss of land owing to rising waters there threatens to drive further social and political instability in the region, which could lead to armed conflicts again and increase the likelihood of terrorism,” said Castellaw, who is now on the advisory board of the Center for Climate and Security, a research and advocacy group in Washington. “So, this is far more than an environmental problem,” he said. “It's a humanitarian, security and possibly military problem too.”
【小题1】How many people will be threatened by 2050 according to the research?A.About 15 million. | B.About 50 million. |
C.About 150 million. | D.About 450 million. |
A.The migration caused rising seas. |
B.Basra could be entirely underwater by 2050. |
C.Rising seas could erase all the world's great coastal cities. |
D.Further loss of land owing to rising waters could cause armed conflicts. |
A.To advise people to move house. | B.To tell new research. |
C.To warn the danger of conflicts. | D.To appeal for environmental protection. |
A.A science magazine. | B.A geography textbook. |
C.Science fiction. | D.A medical journal. |
Search and rescue teams are often accompanied by man’s best friend. A dog’s superior sense of smell can be critical to finding survivors buried under fallen buildings. But now a new animal is being trained to assist search and rescue teams after an earthquake hits, and it’s the rat.
These rescue rats are being trained by Dr. Donna Kean, a researcher from Glasgow, Scotland who has been working with rats for years. Kean explained why she and her colleagues at the nonprofit APOPO train rats instead of dogs. “The rats have a comparable sense of smell and they’re just as trainable as dogs.” she said. “Their size is useful because they will be able to move through different environments that dogs just wouldn’t be able to.”
At the moment. the rats are wearing homemade backpacks that contain microphones, video equipment and location trackers and then scientists are sending these rats into mock debris(模拟的废墟). Rats would be able to get into small spaces to get to victims buried in the ruins. “We have not been in a real situation yet, we have got a mock debris site. When we track the backpack, we will be able to hear from where the rat is inside the debris.” Kean said. “We have the potential to speak to victims through the rat.”
Researchers train them on a basic series of behavior. Training starts off in a really basic environment: a small and empty room. Then they gradually expand and increase the complexity in order to make it like real life. They can start adding in debris and making the training area look more like an actual collapsed building site.
The training just started. and researchers still have to run training trials outside the research environment. They are working with a search and rescue group called GEA, who are based in Turkey, a country with frequent earthquakes and hoping that by next year they’ll be able to take the rats to Turkey for trials.
【小题1】What advantage do rats have over dogs in the rescue work?A.They are easier to train. |
B.They have a better sense of smell. |
C.They are more flexible with a smaller size. |
D.They adapt to new environments more quickly. |
A.To guide rats to find survivors. | B.To protect rats from being injured. |
C.To provide some food for trapped people. | D.To help rescuers communicate with victims. |
A.The process of training the rats. | B.The difficulty of conducting experiments. |
C.The rats’ behaviour in real collapsed sites. | D.The importance of the research environment. |
A.Use rats for rescue work on a large scale. | B.Send rats to Turkey for field experiments. |
C.Conduct further study on disaster prevention. | D.Develop the tracking technology to assist GEA. |
Going to the zoo is an all-time favorite activity for children and families. However, there are some who argue against keeping wild animals in zoos for a number of reasons. In order to make a decision, we must consider the arguments for and against keeping wild animals in zoos.
Another thing we need to take into consideration is the cost of maintaining a zoo. A lot of funds are needed to run a zoo. Money is needed to stock the zoo with all kinds of animals. Staff must be hired and trained to take care of each species of animal.
In conclusion, while zoos do have some advantages in the areas of education and conservation, it is cruel and selfish to keep animals in an unnatural prison.
A.This is a very big difference. |
B.The animals need food and medical care. |
C.If you want to see animals, I advise you to go on a safari (猎游). |
D.The money and effort are better used for conservation programs. |
E.On the other hand, keeping animals in zoos is similar to a prison sentence. |
F.One benefit of zoos is that they are useful for educating people about animals. |
G.Many animals are mistreated because their caregivers lack the knowledge of caring for them. |
The door of a small cage opens up and a bird flies into a large enclosure (围场). The bird lands on a tree and moves its red head to the side, as if it is surprised. “That’s what it feels like to be free,” said Juan Camilo Panqueba, who works at a wildlife center in the Colombian city of Bogota, far from the Caribbean coast, where the bird usually lives.
Birdsong contests have taken place all over the Caribbean for hundreds of years. Although catching any wildlife is not permitted by the law, wildlife trafficking (非法交易) still happens a lot in Colombia, as the officials were too busy fighting with the drug trade, nongovernment fighters and other dangerous groups. Until recently, they did not enforce (强制实施) the law. Now, as dangerous groups have fallen and with the drug trade mostly destroyed, officials are taking another look.
Three weeks ago, Colombian officials saved birds from a group. The group was mostly people who had recently moved to Bogota from the Caribbean and Venezuela. Officials accuse (控告) the group of setting up a songbird competition on social media. In a closed Facebook group, crowds cheered and recorded the loudness and the number of calls from each bird. The owner of the winning bird received$100, and people who correctly predicted the winner could also win money. Environmental officials say the birds were badly hurt, because they were kept in the small cages and forced to listen to loud music all day long to make sure they can sing. In the wild, the birds sing to protect themselves or find a mate. “For them, it was like cruel harm,” noted Juan Camilo Panqueba, who works at Bogota’s wildlife center. There, he and others care for birds and more than 1, 000 animals.
Colombians have grown to understand the importance of wildlife, and officials are working to end animal trafficking.
【小题1】Colombia has lots of wildlife trafficking because ________.A.there was no law to protect wildlife |
B.people from other countries kept coming |
C.Colombians are people that like birds very much |
D.the government didn’t have enough time to carry out the law strictly |
A.It’s a new form of entertainment. |
B.The birds were badly treated during the contest. |
C.Finding their mates was what birds sang for. |
D.All the owners of the birds can win a prize. |
A.There will be less and less harm to wildlife. |
B.Government officials will keep the wild animals. |
C.Birdsong contests will be more and more popular. |
D.Many wild animals will die out because of the trafficking. |
A.The bird training methods are important. |
B.There are many kinds of wildlife in Colombia. |
C.Colombia has introduced laws to stop the harm to wildlife. |
D.Birdsong contests did a lot of harm to birds and Colombia is trying to stop it. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网