Families will be rewarded for the first time for putting out less rubbish under new plans to significantly promote recycling, especially of valuable materials like glass.
The new plan for collecting waste in England will scrap fines (罚款) for putting plastic in the wrong recycling bin. Instead, families will be offered rewards for recycling more rubbish measured by a microchip (芯片) in the rubbish bin. Caroline Spelman, an Environment Secretary, said, “It is better to use a plan that offers people rewards, rather than punishing them. We want to help those people who want to do the right thing by reducing waste and recycling at home. This means making sure communities are getting the collection services they want and not punishing hard-working families who make mistakes by putting bins out on the wrong day or leaving the waste in the wrong recycling bin.”
Though the punishment for putting waste in the wrong recycling bin has been given up, plans to try and remove the unpopular twice-a-week bin collections have largely failed despite the efforts of Eric Pickles, a Communities Secretary. Although Mrs. Spelman made it clear that communities will be supported in efforts to increase the times of collections, and the Conservative Party will not force local authorities to return to weekly collections. Most communities expect the introduction of weekly rubbish collections, as this will solve some of the problems about environment.
“We will continue to help local communities develop local solutions to collecting and dealing with family waste and will work with communities to meet families’ reasonable expectations for weekly collections, particularly of smelly waste.” said Mrs. Spelman.
【小题1】What will families be rewarded for in future?A.Producing less rubbish. | B.Putting bins out on the right day. |
C.Throwing rubbish into the bin. | D.Leaving rubbish in the wrong recycling bin. |
A.reduce | B.remove | C.increase | D.pay |
A.The Conservative Party refuses the weekly collection. |
B.Both Rewards and punishment should be carried out. |
C.Local solutions to collecting family waste will be stopped. |
D.People will not be punished for putting rubbish wrongly. |
A.Travel. | B.Literature. | C.Environment. | D.Medicine. |
Say No to Non-electric Cars
Most modern cities have taken action to reduce traffic jams and improve air quality. But if they want to become more livable, they should think about more ambitious goals.
Amsterdam has set a good example. As from 2030, driving a gas vehicle there will not be allowed. The Dutch capital wants its citizens to become healthier and happier.
The advantages of such plans are clear.
Saying no to non-electric cars or even all cars is hard.
A.But will everyone support such plans? |
B.The government should advocate the use of electric cars. |
C.Traffic jams waste huge amounts of fuel and time each year. |
D.Electric cars not only are energy-saving but produce little noise. |
E.But let’s think seriously about our well-being and that of our planet. |
F.People who drive electric car maybe given discount son parking fees. |
G.One way to do is to encourage them to switch to electric cars or give up driving altogether. |
UK supermarkets are producing more plastic waste despite promises to cut down, new re-search suggests, as sales of bags for life increase to 1.5 billion.
Retailers (零售商)were responsible for more than 900,000 tons of plastic waste in 2018, according to a report from the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) released Thursday. Seven of the 10 largest supermarket chains reported a higher plastic packaging tonnage in 2019 compared to last year, although exact figures for this year have not been released.
Compared to 2018, this year the number of sold eco-friendly bags for life rose by about 25%, the report stated. Campaigners said the rise showed that the bags are now being used by many as a replacement for single-use carrier bags.
Campaigners recommend that supermarkets increase the price of bags for life to 70 pence ($0.9). They point to the 90% reduction in bags for life sales in Ireland, where prices are set at 70 cents ($0.77). However, in an ideal world bags for life would be removed completely, enforced by a government ban, said campaigners.
“It's shocking to see that despite unprecedented (空前的)awareness of the pollution crisis, the amount of single-use plastic used by the UK's biggest supermarkets has actually increased in the past year,” said Juliet Phillips, EIA ocean campaigner. He added, “Our survey shows that grocery retailers need to tighten up targets to drive real reductions in single use packaging and items. We need to address our throwaway culture at it's root through systems change, not materials change. Substituting one single-use material for another is not the solution.”
The report reveals that plastic use among suppliers is also to blame, and supermarkets have failed to make them reduce plastic packaging. Tesco has led the way in this area, threatening to delist (退市)products for suppliers who fail to cut excessive plastic. Campaigners are urging other supermarkets to do the same.
Plastic waste is a global issue and various countries have taken action to reduce its impact.
【小题1】What does the new research in the UK find?A.What results in more plastic waste. | B.Why customers use more bags for life. |
C.How many plastic bags have been used now. | D.How UK supermarkets cut down plastic waste. |
A.It decreased slightly. | B.It became more serious. |
C.It got controlled well. | D.It was out of control. |
A.Banning the use of bags for life. |
B.Charging more for producing plastic bags. |
C.Taking practical steps to reduce plastic waste. |
D.Changing the materials to make plastic bags. |
A.It required suppliers to cut down plastic packaging. |
B.It found out a replacement for single-use carrier bags. |
C.It called on consumers to use fewer plastic bags. |
D.It forced supermarkets to fight against plastic pollution. |
Antarctic Tourism: Should We Just Say No?
More people are visiting Antarctic, the frozen continent than ever before.
The distance most visitors travel to reach Antarctica makes carbon emissions a serious problem.
There is clear agreement that something needs to change, but no agreement on what those changes should be.
A.The number of visitors hit 100,000 for the first time this tourist season, a 40% jump over the previous record. |
B.The Antarctic is at risk not just because of the breakability of its environment, but due to the lack of a single governing body. |
C.Should landings be made at a larger number of sites for instance, or should we aim to keep the human footprint as small as possible? |
D.If what you really want is to connect with snow and ice and you’re in the northern half, can you catch a train to the nearest snow region instead? |
E.The average per-person carbon emissions for an Antarctic tourist are 3.76 tonnes – about the total sum that an individual typically generates in an entire year. |
F.There is so little regulation now that almost anything that will protect the areas by an official legal source rather than self-regulated would be really positive. |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网