试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷3
Dear Editor of Macquarie Dictionary,

My name is Wendy, a second generation Chinese-Australian migrant and a mother of two young children. I'm writing to express my disappointment in one of Macquare Dictionary's entries, namely the definition of the word “monolid”.

In both the paper version (7th edition) and online version of the Dictionary, Macquarie defines "monolid" as: An upper eyelid(眼睑) without fold perceived by some in Asia to give an appearance of laziness. his definition has disturbed me and many Asians living in Australia. Linguistically(从语言学角度), the term "monolid" is a prettyunbiaseddescription of a physical characteristic that involves no feelings, common to over 50% of people of East Asian origin. It's no different to other term describing a physical feature including "blonde" or "freckle".

Take a minute and consider this. Would it be appropriate if the definition of "blonde" became "having fair or light-coloured hair, thought by some in Western countries as possessing little or no intelligence"? Or would it be appropriate if the definition of "freckle" was "a small brownish spot in the skin or face, thought by some as creating an ugly appearance"?

In addition, it is also inappropriate that Macquarie Dictionary—a dictionary of choice by many Australian schools-defines a term in a way which may create negative racial connection for Australian children of East Asian origin. Both my kids are born with monolids, a constant reminder of their cultural background. It therefore breaks my heart to imagine a scene where they turn to the dictionary to find that their physical feature is associated with "laziness". What if they get teased by their school friends that they are born "lazy"? What if my sensitive older son starts hating himself and his race classification for being associated with something negative?

For the reasons above, urge Macquarie Dictionary to adjust the current definition of "monolid".Looking forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Wendy

【小题1】What does "unbiased" underlined in para graph 2 probably mean?
A.General.B.Precise.C.Subjective.D.Objective.
【小题2】What is the function of paragraph 3?
A.Calling for readers' attention.B.Supporting the author's position.
C.Raising the author's concern.D.Introducing two words in the dictionary.
【小题3】In what way is the author worried about her children?
A.They might get into bad habit and be lazy.B.They might choose to use the dictionary.
C.They might become victims of the definition.D.They might have monolids.
19-20高三·浙江·阶段练习
知识点:语言与文化 社会问题与社会现象说明文逻辑推理词义猜测 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐
Who taught you to speak English? Your parents, while you were a young child? Your teachers at school ? Perhaps even the BBC as a grown-up. Whoever it was, somehow you have developed an understanding of what is rapidly becoming a truly global language.
There are now about 376 million people who speak English as their first language and about the same number who have learnt it besides their mother tongue. It is said there are one billion people learning English now and about 80% of the information on the Internet is in English.
Is this a good thing, or a bad thing? Should we celebrate the fact that more and more of us can communicate, using a common language, across countries and cultures? Or should we worry about the dangers of “mono-culturalism", a world in which we all speak the same language, eat the same food and listen to the same music?
Does it matter if an increasing number of people speak the same language? On the contrary (相反),I would have thought——although I have never accepted the argument that if only we all understood each other better, there would be fewer wars. Ask the people of India (where many of them speak at least some English) and Pakistan (the same situation with India)…
If we all speak English, will we then all start eating McDonald's burgers? Surely not. If English becomes more dominant (占主导地位的), it will kill other languages? I doubt it. When I travel in Africa or Asia, I am always surprised by how many people can speak not only their own language but also one or more other related languages, as well as English and perhaps some French or German as well.
When we discussed this on Talking Point a couple of years ago, we received a wonderfully poetic email from a listener in Ireland. "The English language is a beautiful language. Maybe it's like a rose," he said. "But who would ever want their garden just full of roses?"
Well, I love roses, and I think they make a beautiful addition to any garden. But the way I see it, just by planting a few roses, you don't necessarily need to pull out everything else. If more and more people want to plant English roses, that's fine by me.
【小题1】By saying "Ask the people of India … and Pakistan" (in Paragraph 4), the author is trying to show that _____.
A.speaking the same language doesn't necessarily bring peace
B.wars can destroy the relationship between two countries
C.English doesn't kill other languages
D.English is widely used in the world
【小题2】What does "rose" in the last two paragraphs stand for?
A.The worldB.Family
C.LanguageD.The Earth
【小题3】The author would probably agree that _____.
A.it's very hard to plant many kinds of flowers in a garden
B.it's good for people from other countries to learn English
C.more and more people like to plant roses in their gardens
D.English is easier to learn than other languages
【小题4】This passage is mainly about _____.
A.why English has become a global language
B.how many people in the world speak English
C.how people in the world learn English as a foreign language
D.whether we need to worry about English being a world language

In the delightful presence of adorable little things, it isn’t uncommon to be conquered by a desire to shout “Kawaii”. In Western culture, we’ve come to think of kawaii as a synonym for cute. In Japan, where the kawaii aesthetic (审美) has been its own pop culture phenomenon for decades, the word is a bit more complex.

Nittono, a kawaii researcher, says the Japanese word kawaii was originally an affective adjective that expressed one’s feelings toward an object. “In Japanese, we can say ‘feel kawaii,’” he adds. Visually, kawaii is tied to what researchers call baby schema—a large head, round face, and big eyes—but kawaii involves the other senses too. In a paper published in the journal Universal Access, researchers reported that people also label certain sounds as cute, and those sounds tend to be high pitched, like the chirp (鸣叫) of a baby bird.

Kawaii isn’t always what we would traditionally describe as cute, either. Ugly or strange- looking things can also bring about kawaii feelings, a concept referred to as kimo-kawaii, or “gross cute.”

Put simply, Nittono says, kawaii is the “cute emotion” you experience in the presence of something that elicits that emotion.

Kawaii doesn’t just make us feel good — it changes our behavior. Kawaii is what causes you to pinch (捏) a baby’s cheeks or snuggle (紧抱) a puppy. What’s more, kawaii not only makes you want to physically embrace the cute thing, but also enables a natural need to protect it. Kawaii also influences our feelings and behavior in other ways. It has a calming and healing effect, for instance. It also makes us soft — more easily influenced and open to requests. “I think kawaii, or cute feelings, reminds us of human connection that we sometimes forget,” says Nittono.

【小题1】What is the author’s main purpose in writing the text?
A.To explain the word kawaii.B.To praise the effect of kawaii.
C.To recommend a medical method.D.To argue about a culture phenomenon.
【小题2】What do we know about Kawaii?
A.It generally involves different senses.
B.It often conveys human’s negative feelings.
C.It is merely aroused by cute or familiar-looking things.
D.It is widely considered to originate from western cultures.
【小题3】What does the underlined word “elicits” mean in Paragraph 4?
A.Expresses.B.Inspires.
C.Contains.D.Hides.
【小题4】What’s the main idea of Paragraph 5?
A.Examples of cute feelings.B.Results of recent researches.
C.Definitions of new concepts.D.Influences of kawaii on people.

Each May since 1956 people from across Europe and around the world have gathered around their televisions with friends and family for an evening of international entertainment (娱乐): The Eurovision Song Contest. It may be a fun event but perhaps it’s not the shared celebration of European language that it could be. In the first ten years of Eurovision, the UK and Ireland were the only two countries to sing in English. Now English is what we expect. Is it that English has become the official language of music?

From high streets in Hungary to supermarkets in Sweden, from bus stops in Bulgaria to parks in Poland, people listen to English-language music everywhere. And people don’t just listen, they sing it too! From sporting events in Spain to nightclubs in Norway, from concerts in Croatia to fitness classes in France, people sing along to popular songs in their everyday lives, in English. But why?

For one evening each year Eurovision is the dinner party of Europe. A dinner party to which each guest brings something unique. Their clothing, tradition and food represent their culture and their language shows the character of a nation. Although there are 50 nations with 83 languages, for Eurovision, English is the only language. Does Eurovision really represent Europe?

English is an international language spoken by over 1 billion people worldwide. It is no surprise that so many musicians make music in English. Of course, music makes money and more listeners make more money. According to Ragnar Thorhallsson, a singer and guitarist, English is simpler and is easier to make rhymes (韵律). Could this be true?

Let’s remember that although English-language music is everywhere, music is not everything. As long as we continue to learn, to speak, to love, diversity (多样性) shall be valued. After all, what fun is a dinner party if the guests can’t communicate or express themselves in the way they choose?

【小题1】What do we know about Eurovision?
A.Singers sing English songs.
B.It helps protect European cultures.
C.It is the most popular contest in the world.
D.Singers mainly come from the UK and Ireland.
【小题2】What’s the main idea of Paragraph 2?
A.Music in daily life.B.The popularity of English music.
C.The official language of music.D.Music in different countries.
【小题3】What can we infer about Ragnar Thorhallsson’s opinion of English?
A.It is easy and beautiful.
B.It should be used in all music.
C.It is the best language in the world.
D.It helps musicians make money easily.
【小题4】What is mainly discussed in the text?
A.Why we should protect language diversity.
B.How language and music affect each other.
C.Whether English is the official language of music.
D.Why Eurovision is becoming more and more popular.

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网