Skeptics are strange a lot. Some of them refuse to admit the serious threat of the human activities to the environment and they are tired of people who disagree with them. Those people, say skeptics, spread nothing but bad news about the environment. The “eco-guilt” brought on by the discouraging news about our planet gives rise to the popularity of skeptics as people search for more comforting worldviews.
Perhaps that explains why a new book by Bjorn Lomborg received so much publicity. That book, The Skeptical Environmentalist, declares that it measures the “real state of the world” as fine. Of course, another explanation is the deep pockets of some big businesses with special interests. Indeed, Mr. Lomborg’s views are similar to those of some industry–funded organizations, which start huge activities through the media to confuse the public about issues like global warming.
So it was strange to see Mr. Lomborg’s book go largely unchallenged in the media though his beliefs were contrary to most scientific opinions. One national newspaper in Canada ran a number of articles and reviews full of words of praise, even with the conclusion that “After Lomborg, the environmental movement will begin to die down.”
Such one–sided views should have immediately been challenged. But only a different review appeared in Nature, a respected science magazine with specific readership. The review remarked that Mr. Lomborg’s “preference for unexamined materials is incredible”.
A critical eye is valuable, and the media should present information in such a way that could allow people to make informed decisions. Unfortunately, that is often inaccessible as blocked by the desire to be shocking or to defend some special interests. People might become half-blind before a world partially exhibited by the media. That’s a shame, because matters concerning the health of the planet are far too important to be treated lightly.
【小题1】Which of the following can be a reason for the popularity of Lomborg’s book?A.The book challenges views about the fine state of the world. |
B.The author convinces people to speak comforting worldviews. |
C.Industry-funded media present confusing information. |
D.Some big businesses intend to protect their own interests. |
A.voice a different opinion |
B.find fault with Lomborg’s book |
C.point out the value of scientific views |
D.challenge the authority of the media |
A.wrong | B.reliable | C.wise | D.careless |
A.To warn the public of the danger of half-blindness with reviews. |
B.To show the importance of presenting overall information by the media. |
C.To blame the media’s lack of responsibility in information. |
D.To encourage the skeptics to have a critical eye. |
Ways to Fight Microplastics at Home
Our consumption of microplastics is shocking-from 39,000 to 52,000 particles each year per person.
Choose natural fabrics (织物). Many of the fabrics we use every day are made from plastic. In 2016, 65 million tons of plastic went into making fabrics around the world. Tiny bits of plastic fall off these fabrics during production, wearing, washing, and disposal.
Clean up your clothes. It may be tough to remove all microplastic fibers from your clothing. Plus, a single load of washed and dried clothing can release a million microplastic particles into the water supply. Still, all hope is not lost. You can remove microplastics by fixing a filter (过滤器) in your washing machine and air-drying your clothes.
Stop microwaving plastic containers.
A.Stay away from single-use plastics. |
B.Much of that plastic goes into waterways. |
C.It's not clear how they affect the human body. |
D.Avoid drinking from disposable plastic bottles. |
E.Buy your tea loose and use an old-fashion tea cup . |
F.There are plenty of other ways to “green" your laundry routine. |
G.The warmer a plastic container is, the more plastic it is likely to drop. |
Fifty millilitres of perfume rests inside a piece of an elegantly engineered glassware. This delicate bottle, in turn, sits within an equally elegant cardboard box. This box is wrapped (包装)in a thin layer of transparent plastic film and sealed with a holographic sticker. "Would you like it gift-wrapped?” ,asks the eager salesperson. Now another layer of glossy paper, complexity and ribbons is added. Finally, the whole thing is dropped into a cardboard gift bag, bearing the shop's branding.
Surely, it's the gift that counts. It turns out, however, that we appear to appreciate gifts more if they have been gift-wrapped. Studies found gift-wrapped presents were, on average, always rated more highly than non-wrapped ones. This preference was true even when gift-wrapping was pretty basic, that is, no bows or ribbons. One explanation is that, on some level, what we appreciate is the extra effort that it takes to package and gift-wrap items so delicately.
The downside of our love of beautiful packaging and seemly gift-wrapping, however, is that it has an impact on the environment. According to The Guardian, the United Kingdom alone consumes 8,000 tons of wrapping paper a year. Using the most conservative estimates, it takes approximately 12 trees to produce one ton of paper: that's about 96,000 trees in gift-wrap each year for the UK alone.
Perhaps during festive periods, we could launch highly visible campaigns urging the disposal of gift-wrap and product packaging within easily accessible recycling bins. Similarly, shops that offer gift-wrapping could be strongly encouraged to use only recycled paper. Beyond consumer and retailer efforts, producers also need to rethink their packaging - less is best. I would like to see all perfume bottles manufactured so as to be refillable, as they once were and still are in the more traditional Arabian perfume shops.
【小题1】How does the writer begin the passage?A.By making a comparison. | B.By describing a scene. |
C.By presenting a reason. | D.By raising a question. |
A.The boom of non-wrapped gifts. |
B.Fierce competitions between shops. |
C.The disappearance of simple packaging. |
D.Unnecessary consumption of resources. |
A.Reserved. | B.Favorable. | C.Ambiguous. | D.Opposed. |
A.Sending Fewer Gifts Is Better | B.Gift-wrapping Is Here to Stay |
C.It Makes No Sense to Wrap Gifts | D.Gift-wrapping Culture Needs to Change |
Air travel is growing around the globe, and so is its contribution to climate change. The climate cost of flying has drawn more public attention in recent years, even leading to“ flight shame” in some places, especially for local or avoidable flights.
And while a decline in air travel would help with climate change,flight shame can also be added by other ways that make air travel more environmentally friendly. That includes switching to cleaner,renewable fuel , but as a new study indicates , there's also another, less obvious option: flying at lower altitudes.
In a new study, researchers used computers to predict how adjusting aircraft altitudes might reduce the number of contrails(尾迹),which we see as white lines across the sky containing black carbon particles (颗粒),thus reducing their warming effect. The study found that aircraft would only need to adjust their altitudes by about 2 ,000 feet, and since some flights have a larger climate effect than others , only a small part of flights would need to make any adjustments.
Of course flying at a lower altitude might increase flying time and it also means burning significantly more fuel, and thus giving off more CO₂, but the benefits of controlling contrails are worth it.
In addition to changing altitudes,better engine technology could also help control contrails, the researchers add, since black carbon particles are produced by incomplete fuel combustion ( 燃烧). With more efficient engines, aircraft could reportedly reduce their contrail by as much as 70%。Combined with slight altitude adjustment for a small part of flights, this could help reduce overall contrail problems by 90%,the study suggests.
This is promising, but more research i still needed, and it may be a while before improvements like these take effect at a significant scale. So, while it's good to know air travel can have a smaller effect on the climate, for now the best way to achieve that is often by simply staying on the ground whenever possible.
【小题1】What might be the effect of“flight shame" ?A.People will avoid traveling by plane. |
B.Airline companies will limit service targets. |
C.The cost of air travelling will become higher. |
D.People will feel shamed if they haven't taken a plane. |
A.Planes can travel faster. | B.Planes can save more fuel. |
C.Planes may give off less CO2. | D.Planes may have less warming effect. |
A.A way to change altitudes. | B.The future of engine technology. |
C.An approach to reducing contrails. | D.The concept of incomplete combustion. |
A.Energy. | B.Climate. |
C.Finance. | D.Safety. . |
组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网