试题详情
阅读理解-阅读单选 适中0.65 引用1 组卷159

The ancient tale of the Country Mouse and the Town Mouse was only the first to emphasize rural folk's supposed simplicity when compared with more sophisticated urbanites. However, neuro-scientists announce that, in fact, it is city living that can dull the wits.

The new study led by Dr. Spiers at Nantes University describes how they used a dataset from 4 million people of a computer game, which tests navigating skills by asking players to memorise a map showing the location of checkpoints and then measuring how well players can find them, guided only by their mental map. Dr. Spiers and his colleagues examined the 4 million people from 38 countries, and found that the strongest indicator of a high score was a player's age—older people performed relatively poorly, which agrees with what researchers know about age-related cognitive decline. But the benefit of rural living was strong enough to offset some of that. Data showed that a 70-year-old who grew up in the countryside had the navigational abilities of an average 60-year-old across the dataset.

There is a huge gap between the navigation skills of rural and city people, and the researchers think they know why. Dr. Spiers says that the brain's navigational abilities probably weaken in the less challenging city environment because they are not being used as much. Although cities may appear more elaborate, they also feature more clues to help residents find their way, such as numbered streets. In the countryside, however, one field tends to look much the same as another, so there are fewer external landmarks to help guide the way.

Neuroscientists already know that living and working in more complex environments can influence the function and structure of the brain. Brain scans of London taxi drivers, who have gained an encyclopedic memory of the city5 s streets, show that they tend to have an enlarged hippocampus—a region of the brain acting as a neural GPS, sensing position and path on an internal map of the environment.

The harmful effect of city living on navigation is probably most serious in people under 16—18, Dr. Spiers says, because their still-developing brains respond and change the most according to external stimuli. And while people who live in cities with young children should not be alarmed, the study does raise some interesting ideas for urban planners: keep their city designs not so simple perhaps. And for everyone else, it might be an idea to turn off maps on the phone.

【小题1】The study led by Dr. Spiers shows that _______.
A.the seniors score higher at computer games
B.rural life benefits people's sense of direction
C.participants are better at finding ways in cities
D.the young remember checkpoints better in maps
【小题2】The underlined word "offset", in Para. 2 most probably means _______.
A.achieveB.confirm
C.reduceD.replace
【小题3】What is the purpose of the passage?
A.To introduce a new way of driver training.
B.To expose the drawbacks of living in the urban area.
C.To show the contrast between lives in the country and city.
D.To present environments' impact on one's ability to locate places.
【小题4】What is the best tide for the passage?
A.Lost in the City
B.Brain Weakened in Cities
C.Navigating to the Countryside
D.The Negative Effects of City Living
2020·北京海淀·二模
知识点:科普知识 说明文语意转化目的意图标题判断词义猜测 答案解析 【答案】很抱歉,登录后才可免费查看答案和解析!
类题推荐

Experts often tell students to center their efforts on a narrow field to get a job after school. But recent research into Nobel Prize winners suggests that wider interests are important.

One of the winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry was 68-year-old Danish scientist Meldal. When describing his career, Meldal said he started as an engineer but changed to chemistry because he wanted to understand the world.

In a discussion with the Nobel Prize organization, he talked about his co-winner, Carolyn Bertozzi of Stanford University. He said, “She has such broad knowledge of both chemistry and biology and she knows how to use her knowledge in a clever way.”

Meldal’s experience and the way he sees things may come as a surprise to students. They might believe they have to center their work and school lives in one field to be successful. But a study from professors shows that is not always the case. They said that a large number of Nobel Prize winners can be described as “polymaths”, people who have many different interests in both their work and personal lives. This permits scientists to look for creative ways to solve problems. In fact, one important part of science is not discovering answers, but recognizing problems that need to be solved.

The researchers say that Nobel winners are nine times more likely to have experience in working with wood, metal or in the arts than most scientists. They pointed to a 2012 report about students who study two majors in college. Double majors are often more creative and more interested in starting their own businesses. Other researchers have found that having an outside activity like playing chess, performing music or creating art can help predict future success in a job.

【小题1】What do experts often advise their students to do?
A.Devote their time and effort to their related field.
B.Develop a wide interest besides their majors.
C.Pay attention to hot topics in their research field.
D.Keep a good balance between their work and life.
【小题2】What is “polymath”?
A.A person ready to do research and learn art.
B.A person with creative ways to solve problems.
C.A person with college degrees in different majors,
D.A person with different interests in their work and personal lives.
【小题3】What can be said about double majors?
A.They like to create material things.
B.They can recognize problems fast.
C.They can work more creatively.
D.They’re successful businessmen.
【小题4】Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.Double Majors Are Business Bosses
B.Wide Interests Count for Nobel Prize Winners
C.Studying a Major Isn’t Enough to Win a Prize
D.Creative Thinkers Are Preferred for Getting Prizes

The “diet” in diet drinks may be a false promise for some soda lovers. A study published recently in JAMA Network Open adds to the evidence that drinks made with sucralose (蔗糖素) may stimulate the appetite, at least among some people.

“We found that females and people with obesity (肥胖) had greater brain reward activity after consuming the artificial sweetener,” says study author Katie Page. “What was most surprising was the impact of body weight and biological sex. They were very important factors in the way that the brain responded to the artificial sweetener.”

Both groups also had a reduction in the hormone that inhibits (抑制) appetite, and they ate more food after they consumed drinks with sucralose, compared with after regular sugar-sweetened drinks. In contrast, the study found males and people of healthy weight did not have an increase in either brain reward activity or hunger response, suggesting they’re not affected in the same way.

Page and her team measured the response to diet soda in three ways. They used brain images of the 74 study participants to document the activation of parts of the brain linked to appetite. They used blood samples to measure blood sugar and hormones that can drive hunger. And they also tracked how much participants ate at a buffet table at the end of each study session.

“These results are consistent with patterns that we’ve actually seen in my lab in animal studies,” says Susan Swithers, a behavioral scientist at Purdue University.

“You are supposed to get sugar after something tastes sweet. Your body has been accustomed to that,” explains Swithers. But diet soda may lead to a disconnect. The sugar never arrives, and “that could decrease the body’s efficiency in metabolizing (新陈代谢) sugar the next time.”

【小题1】What did Page find might affect the brain’s response to diet soda?
A.The artificial sweetener.B.The drinker’s sex and weight.
C.The reduction in hormones.D.The amount of sweet drinks.
【小题2】What can we learn from paragraph four?
A.The methods of the study.B.The impacts of diet soda.
C.The causes of overeating.D.The responses of participants.
【小题3】What is Swithers’ attitude toward Page’s study?
A.Unclear.B.Approving.C.Doubtful.D.Unsatisfied.
【小题4】Where can you find this text?
A.A story collection.B.A travel journal.
C.A consumer guide.D.A health magazine.

Violent winter weather sweeping across large parts of the central and southern US has brought record-breaking cold temperatures, leaving the electricity cut off and at least 21 deaths.

The worst power outages were in Texas, where more than 4 million homes and businesses remained without power on Tuesday in subfreezing temperatures. Elsewhere more than 250,000 people also lost power across parts of Appalachia, and 4 million people lost power in Mexico.

The blackouts forced Harris county to scramble(争夺)to get more than 8,000 doses of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine into people's arms, after the county public health facility lost power and its back-up generator also failed. The conditions also delayed vaccine shipments. State officials said Texas, due to receive more than 400,000 doses this week, did not expect deliveries until at least Wednesday.

Associating climate change, normally connected with burning heat, with an unusual winter storm that has destroyed a wide part of Texas, most people find it seem so abnormal. But scientists say there is evidence that the rapid heating of the Arctic can help push cold air from the north pole much further south, possibly to the US-Mexico border.

This phenomenon has shown itself to a dramatic degree over the past month, with a splitting of the polar vortex(涡旋)helping cause huge flurries of snow in Europe as well as record cold temperatures in parts of the US used to milder winters.

There is no agreement among scientists over the interaction between Arctic heat and cold weather further south, which is called as a topic of “an active area of research”. Global heating is causing warmer winters, and record cold temperatures are now being clearly outpaced by record hot temperatures, but the complex interaction of climatic conditions still requires further investigation, to the great surprise of some among others, including some famous scientists.

【小题1】What record has been broken recently in the US?
A.The power outage.B.The cold weather.
C.Coronavirus vaccine.D.Deaths in the blackouts.
【小题2】Why did vaccines become of vital importance in Harris county?
A.Vaccine shipments were disturbed by its state government.
B.More back-up generators should be set up to provide power.
C.Harris county had an argument with the Texas government.
D.The local health facility failed to work properly without power.
【小题3】What do the public think about the weather phenomenon in the central and southern US?
A.Unreasonable.B.Undoubted.
C.Discouraging.D.Predictable.
【小题4】What interaction of climates is focused on by scientists?
A.Milder winters and violent summers.B.Arctic cold and Antarctic heat.
C.Global heating and violent cold weather.D.Cold and heat in active areas

组卷网是一个信息分享及获取的平台,不能确保所有知识产权权属清晰,如您发现相关试题侵犯您的合法权益,请联系组卷网